Clinical Trials Logo

Personality Disorders clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Personality Disorders.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01924715 Completed - Depression Clinical Trials

Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of ISTDP: A Quasi Experimental Study

CEISTDP
Start date: January 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Objective: To evaluate whether or not cases treated with Intensive Short-term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP) facilitate healthcare cost reduction, whether any observed reduction is greater than that of a control group and whether any such gains would be maintained in follow up. Design: A quasi-experimental design was employed in which pre and post healthcare cost and usage data were extracted for all ISTDP treated cases from 1999 to 2008 and compared to parallel measures of a control group of cases referred but never treated.

NCT ID: NCT01912391 Completed - Clinical trials for Borderline Personality Disorder

Clinical Research Study to Evaluate Selegiline in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

Start date: October 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Selegiline is superior to placebo in improving psychological and physical functioning in patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.

NCT ID: NCT01904227 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Borderline Personality Disorder

Intensified, Inpatient Adaptation of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

REDBT
Start date: February 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

An randomized clinical trial to investigate whether among adult borderline patients (18 - 40 year), intensified inpatient short term (12 weeks) inpatient Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is more effective in declining the proportion of patients that show suicidal/self-harming behavior in the first 3 months of treatment, compared to standard outpatient DBT, and whether this difference between the groups is sustained at 6 and 12 months.

NCT ID: NCT01900886 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Hepatitis C, Chronic

Epidemiological Study to Evaluate Personality Disorders in Prison Populations in Treatment for Hepatitis C

Perseo
Start date: December 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Primary objective: Evaluate the prevalence of personality disorders in patients starting treatment for hepatitis C in the prison and determine their influence on the evolution of the disease.

NCT ID: NCT01896024 Completed - Clinical trials for Borderline Personality Disorder

Effects of Motive-Oriented Therapeutic Relationship in the Early-Phase Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

MOTR
Start date: June 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The present research aims at examining the effectiveness of a specific set of therapist relational interventions and attitudes, called the Motive-Oriented Therapeutic Relationship (MOTR), based on Plan Analysis (Caspar, 2007) in the early-phase treatment of patients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. The investigators intend to include N = 80 outpatients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder, consulting at the Outpatient Personality Disorder Program of the Karl Jaspers Clinical Unit, in collaboration with the Institute of Psychotherapy, at the Department of Psychiatry-CHUV, University of Lausanne and in collaboration with the University of Berne, Switzerland. Patients are assigned by chance to two treatment conditions 1) Control condition (General Psychiatric Management; Gunderson & Links, 2008) and 2) MOTR-condition. The investigators hypothesize better results in the MOTR-condition, as compared to the control condition in terms of symptom reduction pre-post. The conduct of the study represents a significant contribution to the understanding and enhancement of relationship aspects in the treatment of patients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder which may be of potential benefit for these patients.

NCT ID: NCT01876524 Completed - Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

tRNS in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Reduces Craving Over Dual Pathology Patients

tRND&SUDs
Start date: July 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to study the efficacy and security of noninvasive brain stimulation as a new approach for patients with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) plus other psychiatric conditions like ADHD, Schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, etc.

NCT ID: NCT01720953 Terminated - Clinical trials for Borderline Personality Disorder

Neuropsychiatric Mechanisms of Change in Mentalization Based Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder (MENTAB)

MENTAB
Start date: October 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Purpose: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex psychiatric disease of uncertain aetiology and pathogenesis. A key mechanism of disease susceptibility and treatment response could be epigenetic changes in DNA methylation patterns. However, no study has yet demonstrated that psychotherapy can exert its therapeutic effect through epigenetic mechanisms. The main aim of this study is to analyze the promoter methylation pattern of genes considered to be related to the development and psychopathology of BPD, in particular the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glucocorticoid receptor genes, and the effects of mentalization based treatment (MBT) on changes. Associations to changes in BDNF serum levels and salivary cortisol levels, as well as key components of BPD aetiology and core treatment targets in MBT, will also be investigated. Should epigenetic mechanisms have importance for BPD pathology and effects of treatment, there is potential use of DNA methylation patterns as valid biomarker measures of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response. Hypothesis: The formation and maintenance of symptoms in BPD is mediated through neuropsychiatric mechanisms that can be affected through psychological treatment. Specifically, aberrant epigenetic regulation of neuropsychiatric genes related to behavioural control and affect regulation, as well as BDNF and cortisol levels, is ameliorated by therapeutic processes. Method: Fifty female patients diagnosed with BPD will undergo a year of intensive MBT that is designed to target domains of BPD pathology. The patients will be assessed at baseline and every 6 months over the treatment period. Matched healthy control subjects will be assessed at 6 month intervals to compare changes in DNA methylation, BDNF serum levels, salivary cortisol levels, and neuropsychological test performance. To link components of the neuropsychiatric mechanisms underlying the onset of illness, course, and response to treatment, patients will undergo assessment of clinical symptoms, comorbidity patterns and psychosocial impairment. Patients and control subjects will at baseline undergo assessment for childhood trauma, self-harm, suicidal behavior, early maladaptive schemas, and personality traits, and within the 1-year study period also undergo continuous assessment for changes in symptoms of dissociation, depression, and personality dysfunction.

NCT ID: NCT01719731 Completed - Clinical trials for Borderline Personality Disorder

Psychoeducation of Borderline Patients

Start date: July 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Recent research suggests that BPD is a common, serious but treatable disorder with a better than previously recognized prognosis. Despite these findings, many patients with BPD are not given the borderline diagnosis by the mental health professionals treating them. It is also true that many newly diagnosed borderline patients are not provided with up-to-date information on the disorder even though psychoeducation has been found to be a useful form of treatment for other serious psychiatric illnesses. The investigators have conducted a preliminary randomized trial of psychoeducation for BPD that found that those provided with immediate psychoeducation had a significantly greater reduction in two core symptoms of BPD--general impulsivity and stormy relationships--than those with delayed psychoeducation. However, both instruction and assessment of change over time were conducted in person by paraprofessionals. The importance of the current study is that it will allow the investigators to develop and test the efficacy of an internet-based program of psychoeducation for BPD that will be both cost efficient and easy to disseminate widely, particularly to underserved populations.

NCT ID: NCT01683136 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Borderline Personality Disorder

Evaluation of the HBDL Coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Device - Feasibility Study for the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

Start date: September 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is an open study.approximately 20 patients diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (in case patient is under drug treatment, treatment should be stable within the prior 4 weeks before study entry).Starting from the third day, subjects would undergo rTMS (repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) for five days a week, for four weeks, and will be clinically evaluated in order to monitor for improvement. The investigators anticipate a significant reduction in symptoms severity at the end of the treatment compared to study entry.

NCT ID: NCT01653548 Completed - Depression Clinical Trials

Evaluating a Novel Method of Generalizing Emotion Regulation

EMOGEN
Start date: August 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the present project is to develop and evaluate a novel and brief method of generalizing habituation (i.e., calming down after being upset) from an original learning context in the laboratory to other contexts inside and outside the laboratory. Specifically, the primary aim of this project is to evaluate whether novel habituation reminders (HRs) introduced following personally-relevant emotional stressors reduce acute negative emotions and psychological distress outside of an original learning context. Using a team of basic and applied scientists, over 4 years the investigators expect to screen 420 adult outpatients to enroll 250 study participants who have extreme difficulties with emotion regulation. These 250 participants will be randomly assigned to one of eight experimental groups, with the experimental design leading them through 1 or 2 of 3 project experiments. Actual enrollment: 372 adult outpatients signed consent and enrolled into the study. 222 participants were eligible and began the study. Out of the 222, 210 completed the study (as opposed to the desired 250). Experiment 1 will evaluate whether novel auditory HRs following personally-relevant emotional stressors differentially reduce psychological distress and negative emotions (via self-report and psychophysiology), compared to no HRs, within the same and different lab contexts after a 1 week delay. Experiment 2 will evaluate whether HRs differentially reduce negative emotions, psychological distress, difficulties with emotion regulation, and psychiatric symptoms, compared to sham sounds outside the laboratory across a 1 week period, using 8x daily assessments of distress and emotions and automated HRs/shams when acute negative emotions are present. An automated server and cellular phone system will be used to assess distress and emotional states and to deliver HRs/shams. Experiment 3 will examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effect size estimates when participants self-initiate the use of HRs in their daily lives across a 2 week period when acute negative emotions are present. The specific randomization rules across the 8 groups are explained in detail in the full protocol . Risks in this study may arise from 1) the assessment interviews and questionnaires, and 2) discussing and hearing self-reported distressing events. Initial analyses will focus on the success of randomization to groups. The investigators will examine group differences on possible covariates (e.g., demographic variables) and those that are different across conditions will be used as covariates. Preliminary analyses will examine distributional properties of primary outcome measures and correlations among outcome measures and possible covariates. The investigators will set alpha at .05 for all analyses of primary hypotheses. To examine the influence of psychiatric symptoms (compared to the HR) on primary outcomes, the investigators will examine the relationship between baseline clinically relevant psychiatric variables (e.g., symptom severity) and changes in SUDS, emotional arousal, and clinical outcomes over time and if appropriate include these variables in primary analyses. Full data analytic plans are described in the full protocol.