VQI DELTA Paclitaxel Device Safety Analysis

Peripheral Vascular Disease Clinical Trial

— VQI-PTX  

Official title:

Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) - Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis (DELTA) Paclitaxel Device Safety Analysis - Phase I Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04110288
• Other study ID #: 20193123
• Secondary ID: U01FD004963
• Status: Completed
• Start date: January 1, 2017
• Est. completion date: April 1, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: October 2020
• Source: Lahey Clinic
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The VQI-DELTA Paclitaxel Device Safety Analysis seeks to assess the comparative safety of paclitaxel coated balloons and stents in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) through analysis of the VQI Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) registry module using the DELTA system.

Description:

The VQI-DELTA Paclitaxel Device Safety Analysis seeks to assess the comparative safety of paclitaxel coated balloons and stents in the treatment of PAD through analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) registry module using the DELTA system. The objective of the VQI - DELTA Paclitaxel Phase I Study is to evaluate the relative safety of Paclitaxel used as an antiproliferative agent in the treatment of symptomatic PAD. The study will analyze Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) and Paclitaxel Drug Eluting Stents (DES), both together and as unique exposures using propensity score matched survival analysis. If a mortality signal is detected, factors associated with late mortality will be further explored. Phase I is the retrospective component of the planned study, evaluating the 2-year survival of patients treated with a paclitaxel containing/eluting device to matched patients treated with non-paclitaxel devices for symptomatic PAD. All proposed analyses will be performed using DELTA v3.x, which has the capability to prospectively monitor clinical data repositories for safety signals, and is designed to support risk-adjusted prospective safety surveillance analyses of complex clinical datasets. Three principle analyses are planned: 1. Paclitaxel DCB (including the Bard Lutonix, Medtronic In.Pact and Philips Spectranetics Stellarex DCB's) as compared with propensity matched patients treated with plain balloons. 2. Paclitaxel delivering DES (including the Cook Zilver PTX and Boston Scientific Eluvia DES) as compared with propensity matched cases using bare metal stents (BMS). 3. Patients treated with either Paclitaxel DCB or Paclitaxel DES compared with propensity matched controls (with DCB patients matched to patients treated with plain balloons, and DES patients matched to patients treated with BMS).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 219483
• Est. completion date: April 1, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: August 30, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All patients who underwent endovascular interventional treatment of the femoral or popliteal arteries for symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

• In an effort to focus this safety evaluation on those patients being treated in accordance with accepted 'best practice' endovascular intervention strategies and 'on-label' use of devices, patients will be excluded from either exposure cases or controls if they received a balloon expandable stent or a balloon expandable stent graft in the treatment of femoral or popliteal disease. Balloon expandable stents were excluded because these stents have historically shown inferior patency and current best practice favors placement of self-expanding nitinol stents which were engineered for the femoral popliteal segment and tested in multiple trials for this indication 12-14. Additionally, patients will be excluded (as either potential cases or controls) if their index procedure was performed for acute limb ischemia due to the different etiologies (embolism, in-situ thrombosis) as compared with chronic conditions as they have different treatment paradigms and higher major amputation and mortality rates. In addition, patients with prior angioplasty or stenting of the superficial femoral artery (SFA)-popliteal segment will be excluded in order to avoid the possibility of improperly assigning paclitaxel exposure to the control group.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Peripheral Arterial Disease
• Peripheral Vascular Disease
• Peripheral Vascular Diseases
• Vascular Diseases

Intervention

Drug:
• Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease

Device:
• Non-drug coated Device Treatment

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Lahey Clinic, Inc.	Burlington	Massachusetts

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Lahey Clinic	Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (17)

Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61. doi: 10.1002/pst.433. — View Citation

Baril DT, Ghosh K, Rosen AB. Trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute lower extremity ischemia in the United States Medicare population. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):669-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.244. Epub 2014 Apr 24. — View Citation

Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug 1;158(3):280-7. — View Citation

Chowdhury MM, McLain AD, Twine CP. Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 24;(6):CD006767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006767.pub3. Review. — View Citation

Dick P, Wallner H, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Mlekusch W, Lammer J, Koppensteiner R, Minar E, Schillinger M. Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec 1;74(7):1090-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22128. — View Citation

Earnshaw JJ, Whitman B, Foy C. National Audit of Thrombolysis for Acute Leg Ischemia (NATALI): clinical factors associated with early outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2004 May;39(5):1018-25. — View Citation

Eliason JL, Wainess RM, Proctor MC, Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Upchurch GR Jr, Stanley JC, Henke PK. A national and single institutional experience in the contemporary treatment of acute lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg. 2003 Sep;238(3):382-9; discussion 389-90. — View Citation

Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, Fleisher LA, Fowkes FGR, Hamburg NM, Kinlay S, Lookstein R, Misra S, Mureebe L, Olin JW, Patel RAG, Regensteiner JG, Schanzer A, Shishehbor MH, Stewart KJ, Treat-Jacobson D, Walsh ME. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 21;69(11):1465-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 13. Review. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 21;69(11):1520. — View Citation

Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Hands L, Silver LE, Rothwell PM; Oxford Vascular Study. Population-Based Study of Incidence, Risk Factors, Outcome, and Prognosis of Ischemic Peripheral Arterial Events: Implications for Prevention. Circulation. 2015 Nov 10;132(19):1805-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016424. Epub 2015 Sep 8. Erratum in: Circulation. 2015 Nov 10;132(19):e234. — View Citation

Hsieh FY, Lavori PW, Cohen HJ, Feussner JR. An overview of variance inflation factors for sample-size calculation. Eval Health Prof. 2003 Sep;26(3):239-57. Review. — View Citation

Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Kitrou P, Krokidis M, Karnabatidis D. Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245. — View Citation

Kumar A, Matheny ME, Ho KK, Yeh RW, Piemonte TC, Waldman H, Shah PB, Cope R, Normand SL, Donnelly S, Robbins S, Resnic FS. The data extraction and longitudinal trend analysis network study of distributed automated postmarket cardiovascular device safety surveillance. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):38-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001123. Epub 2014 Dec 9. — View Citation

Oakes D, Feng C. Combining stratified and unstratified log-rank tests in paired survival data. Stat Med. 2010 Jul 20;29(16):1735-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.3921. — View Citation

Resnic FS, Gross TP, Marinac-Dabic D, Loyo-Berrios N, Donnelly S, Normand SL, Matheny ME. Automated surveillance to detect postprocedure safety signals of approved cardiovascular devices. JAMA. 2010 Nov 10;304(18):2019-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1633. — View Citation

Resnic FS, Majithia A, Marinac-Dabic D, Robbins S, Ssemaganda H, Hewitt K, Ponirakis A, Loyo-Berrios N, Moussa I, Drozda J, Normand SL, Matheny ME. Registry-Based Prospective, Active Surveillance of Medical-Device Safety. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376(6):526-535. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516333. Epub 2017 Jan 25. — View Citation

Schillinger M, Minar E. Past, present and future of femoropopliteal stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Feb;16 Suppl 1:I147-52. doi: 10.1583/1545-1550-16.16.I-147. Review. — View Citation

Vidi VD, Matheny ME, Resnic FS. Post-marketing device safety surveillance. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):307-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Feb 28. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Falsification - Freedom from Resuming Smoking	Not resuming smoking post procedure	2 year post intervention
Primary	Survival from Death	Freedom from death of any cause	2 years post intervention
Secondary	Intervention Success	Freedom from death (any cause), re-treatment or major amputation	2 year post intervention
Secondary	Successful Ambulation	Successfully ambulating, ambulating with assistance or with prosthesis	1 year post intervention