Periodontal Diseases Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Technologies (Novamin, Refix and Refix-k) in Reducing Dental Hypersensitivity in Periodontal Patients
NCT number | NCT04422184 |
Other study ID # | DHPP60 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 4 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | July 29, 2019 |
Est. completion date | May 3, 2023 |
Verified date | May 2023 |
Source | University of Sao Paulo |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The present project will compare the effect of DH reduction using three different dentifrices (Sensodyne Repair and Protect - NOVAMIN technology; Dentalclean Daily Regenerator - REFIX technology; Dentalclean Daily Regenerator - REFIX technology + potassium citrate) in periodontal patients. The evaluation will be in 6 moments: T1 and T2- immediately before and after scaling and root planing (SRP) procedures; T3-after polishing sensitive areas with rubbers cups and the dentifrice determined for each group of patients and T4, 5, 6- After 2, 4 and 8 weeks of SRP. Profissional assessments and patient perception data will be performed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 33 |
Est. completion date | May 3, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | May 3, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - patients diagnosed with periodontitis - 18 to 70 years old - systemically healthy - without any allergy to the dentifrices components - patients who needed scaling and root planing procedures - patients who had at least 2 teeth with DH (incisors, canines or premolars). Exclusion Criteria: - pregnancy - patients in orthodontic treatment - patients with oral tumors, caries, fractured teeth, suspected endodontic involvement or excessive mobility; - patients who used medication that could mask the painful sensation or who had used desensitizing agents in the last 3 months. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Bauru School of Denstistry | Bauru | SP |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Sao Paulo |
Brazil,
Patil SA, Naik BD, Suma R. Evaluation of three different agents for in-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):38-42. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.156796. — View Citation
West NX, Seong J, Davies M. Management of dentine hypersensitivity: efficacy of professionally and self-administered agents. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S256-302. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12336. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Professional evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity | Air blast sensitivity evaluated by an experienced dentist (Schiff scale) Score 0 = Tooth/Subject does not show sensitivity in response to air stimulation; 1 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3 = Tooth/Subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. | T1- immediately before scaling and root planing procedures (SRP) | |
Primary | Professional evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity | Air blast sensitivity evaluated by an experienced dentist (Schiff scale) Score 0 = Tooth/Subject does not show sensitivity in response to air stimulation; 1 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3 = Tooth/Subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. | T2 - immediately after scaling and root planing procedures (SRP) | |
Primary | Professional evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity | Air blast sensitivity evaluated by an experienced dentist (Schiff scale) Score 0 = Tooth/Subject does not show sensitivity in response to air stimulation; 1 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3 = Tooth/Subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. | T3 - immediately after polishing sensitive areas with rubber cups and the dentifrice determined for each group of patients. | |
Primary | Professional evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity | Air blast sensitivity evaluated by an experienced dentist (Schiff scale) Score 0 = Tooth/Subject does not show sensitivity in response to air stimulation; 1 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3 = Tooth/Subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. | T4 - 2 weeks after SRP. | |
Primary | Professional evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity | Air blast sensitivity evaluated by an experienced dentist (Schiff scale) Score 0 = Tooth/Subject does not show sensitivity in response to air stimulation; 1 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3 = Tooth/Subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. | T5 - 4 weeks after SRP. | |
Primary | Professional evaluation of Dentin Hypersensitivity | Air blast sensitivity evaluated by an experienced dentist (Schiff scale) Score 0 = Tooth/Subject does not show sensitivity in response to air stimulation; 1 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2 = Tooth/Subject responds to air stimulus, and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3 = Tooth/Subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. | T6 - 8 weeks after SRP. | |
Secondary | Patient's perception of DH | Patient's perception of DH was also evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), being 0 without any painful sensation and 100 the most painful scenario. | T1- immediately before scaling and root planing procedures (SRP) | |
Secondary | Patient's perception of DH | Patient's perception of DH was also evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), being 0 without any painful sensation and 100 the most painful scenario. | T2 - immediately after scaling and root planing procedures (SRP) | |
Secondary | Patient's perception of DH | Patient's perception of DH was also evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), being 0 without any painful sensation and 100 the most painful scenario. | T3 - immediately after polishing sensitive areas with rubber cups and the dentifrice determined for each group of patients. | |
Secondary | Patient's perception of DH | Patient's perception of DH was also evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), being 0 without any painful sensation and 100 the most painful scenario. | T4 - 2 weeks after SRP. | |
Secondary | Patient's perception of DH | Patient's perception of DH was also evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), being 0 without any painful sensation and 100 the most painful scenario. | T5 - 4 weeks after SRP. | |
Secondary | Patient's perception of DH | Patient's perception of DH was also evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), being 0 without any painful sensation and 100 the most painful scenario. | T6 - 8 weeks after SRP. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04712630 -
Non-Incised Papillae Surgical Approach (NIPSA) With and Without Graft
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03997552 -
NIPSA Versus Marginal Approach by Palatal Incision and MIST in Periodontal Regeneration
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04478864 -
Knowledge, Practice and State of Periodontal Health
|
||
Completed |
NCT03507868 -
YKL-40 and IL-6 Levels in Periodontal Disease
|
||
Completed |
NCT05720481 -
Impact of Periodontal Treatment on Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Levels
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06052150 -
Oral Health In Cirrhosis of the Liver (ORACLE)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06025955 -
Evaluation of Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Non- Surgical Versus Surgical Therapy in Furcation Involvement.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03510702 -
SCREENING OF EPIGENETIC BIOMARKERS (miRNAs) IN THE GINGIVAL SULCUS
|
||
Completed |
NCT05631600 -
Manuka Honey as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy: Clinical Study
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05068778 -
Development of an AI App to Improve Compliance in Periodontal Maintenance Patients
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05178563 -
Mechanisms of Acute Inflammation Following Periodontal Treatment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06086821 -
Clinical Relevance of Different Time of Periodontal Re-evaluation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06224699 -
Toothpaste With Sodium Carbonate in Patients With Gingivitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05721313 -
Vital Root Amputation in Molars With Advanced Periodontal Furcation Involvement: a Preliminary Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06040944 -
Antipsychotic Induced Hyperprolactinemaia as Risk Factor for Periodontitis in Schizophrenic Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT06306937 -
Serum Levels of Vitamin D and IL8 in Patients With Periodontitis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04669717 -
Antibiotics as Adjuncts to Periodontal Therapy:Pharmacokinetic Considerations and Dosing Strategies
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05576142 -
Oral Findings in Pediatric Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03588507 -
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of PPF With or Without NCHA Bone in Treatment of Intrabony Defects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03694496 -
The Effectiveness of an Oral Health Education Programme of Adolescents in Hong Kong
|
N/A |