Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06248073
Other study ID # 202202160B0C601
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2024
Est. completion date July 31, 2026

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source Chang Gung University
Contact Kuan-yi Li, PhD
Phone +886 32118800
Email kyli@mail.cgu.edu.tw
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of online self-management program and on-site task-related training for people with early stage Parkinson's disease. people with early stage of Parkinson's disease (age range: 45-70 years) will be randomly assigned into the following three groups: control group, online self-management program group and on-site task-related training group.The control group will receive no treatment during the experimental period. For the other two groups, participants will receive the intervention twice a week, one hour per session and 12 sessions in total. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. the potential impact of motor and non-motor symptoms on activity participation and quality of life for people with early stage of Parkinson's disease (PD). 2. compare and examine the the effectiveness of online self-management program and on-site task-related training for people with early stage Parkinson's disease on activity participation and quality of life.


Description:

This study aims to answer two major research questions. First, the investigators will investigate the potential impact of motor and non-motor symptoms on activity participation and quality of life for people with early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD). Second, the investigators will compare and examine the effectiveness of online self-management programs and on-site task-related training for people with early-stage Parkinson's disease on activity participation and quality of life. Introduction: Previous studies have indicated that hand function impairment may be one of the early motor symptoms and precursor markers of Parkinson's disease. Compared to only receiving drug treatment, additional interventions such as exercise training, environmental adjustments, cognitive behavior and self-management can effectively improve the execution of daily activities and improve the quality of life of patients. Method: The investigators plan to recruit 100 participants within three years and randomly assign them to one of the following three groups: control group, online self-management program group, and on-site task-related training group. Participants: People with early-stage Parkinson's disease (age range: 45-70 years). Procedure: The control group will receive no treatment during the experimental period. For the other two groups, participants will receive the intervention twice a week, one hour per session, and 12 sessions in total. The online self-management program will be an individualized self-management program provided remotely by certified occupational therapists. The on-site task-related training program will include balance and exercise, hand function, and functional task training. Outcome measures: The assessment will be performed before intervention, after the completion of intervention, and 6 months after the post-test. Prior to the experiment, the investigatorswill conduct a pretest. Then, the investigators will conduct a post-test (after intervention) to ensure the short-term effects. Follow-up: After six months of completing the post-test, the cases will undergo a second post-test to understand the long-term effects. Statistical analysis: This study will use two-way repeated measured ANOVA design.The independent variables consist of two factors: the first is the between-group factor, which is the intervention method (control group vs.online self-management program group vs. physical task-related training group); the second is the within-group factor, which is time (pretest vs. first post-test vs. second post-test (follow-up).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date July 31, 2026
Est. primary completion date July 31, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 45 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion criteria: 1. Willingness to sign the informed consent form. 2. Age between 45 and 70 years, with mild idiopathic Parkinson's disease and Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2. 3. No cognitive impairment. 4. No severe depression that could affect the motivation to participate in the study. 5. No history of shoulder dislocation or fracture that could affect body proprioception. 6. No diseases that could affect the ability to reach for objects, such as stroke. 7. No diseases that could affect peripheral sensation, such as diabetes. 8. No severe tremors; patients whose hands, when relaxed and placed on the apparatus, still exhibit significant tremor interfering with the experiment will not be included. 9. Able to follow instructions and complete the assessment process. 10. Have not received physical or occupational therapy in the past year. Exclusion criteria: 1. Other central nervous system diseases, such as stroke. 2. Have major surgery on the head or upper limbs. 3. Inability to perform the reaching task while sitting.

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
on-line self-management training
To encourage adherence to the home program among early-stage Parkinson's disease participants, the investigators have developed various self-management topics, including medication adherence and exercise benefits. The home program is categorized into two dimensions: daily function and exercise. The investigators will provides participants with detailed guidelines to ensure safe execution of the program independently.
onsite task-related training
Participants will receive interventions at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. A certified occupational therapist will conduct the interventions. These sessions will involve functional tasks tailored to each participant's skill level, with two to four varied tasks per session. Additionally, participants will be given booklets to guide them in self-managing similar exercises at home, mirroring the home program of the self-management group.

Locations

Country Name City State
Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Chang Gung University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) To ensure participants do not have dementia or other cognitive impairments. The scale consists of 20 questions and 30 items, including orientation, memory, attention and calculation, recall, and language ability. Each correct answer is scored 1 point, and incorrect or unanswerable questions are scored 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points. Lower score indicates more severe cognitive impairment. Screening-before intervention (one of the inclusive criteria)
Other Beck depression scale The objective is to confirm that study participants do not suffer from severe depression. Should severe depression be detected in a potential participant, they will be excluded from recruitment. The scale consists of 21 questions and 30 items, with a total score of 63 points. A score of 14-19 indicates mild depression, 20-28 indicates moderate depression, and 29 or higher indicates severe depression. Screening-before intervention (one of the inclusive criteria)
Primary Purdue Pegboard Test The change from baseline in dexterity will be measured by the number of pegs participants can put into the holes as quickly as possible. The higher the score, the better the hand dexterity. The test consists of four tasks: inserting pegs with the right hand, inserting pegs with the left hand, inserting pegs with both hands, and assembling pegs with both hands. The time taken to complete the test will be recorded. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Primary Box and Block test The change from baseline in dexterity will be measured by the number of blocks participants can put to another box as quickly as possible. Box and Block test is a commonly used tool in occupational therapy to assess hand dexterity. The patient is seated and the experimenter sits opposite the patient to confirm the testing process. The patient is asked to perform the test with their dominant hand, picking up one block at a time and crossing the partition with the block, placing it in the empty space on the other side. The faster the better. Before the formal test, the patient is given 15 seconds of practice time. The formal test lasts for 1 minute. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Primary Proprioceptive sensitivity Assessment The examiner will use a customized apparatus from the Sensorimotor Control Laboratory at the University of Minnesota to assess position sense motion sense acuity. Participants will be tested on the same-side position matching test and the psychophysical discrimination threshold test. The examiner moves the examinee's testing hand from the starting position to the testing position and then moves the examinee's wrist back to the starting position.
The instrument will use an adaptive algorithm to determine whether to give a simpler or more difficult displacement for the next trial based on whether the examinee's answer is correct or not. A total of about 20 tests are required, and the test time is about 10-15 minutes. The instrument will record the position matching error.
Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Primary Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (NEADL) This assessment tool is used to measure an individual's capacity for instrumental activities of daily living. Based on the classification of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF model), the assessment pertains to the level of activities and participation. It includes a total of 22 items, all of which are activities performed in daily life. Participants are asked to respond based on their actual performance or involvement in these activities over the past few weeks. Each item has four response options for the participant to self-report: can complete independently, can complete independently but with some difficulty, requires assistance from others to complete, and did not perform this activity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-3, with a total score of 66. The higher the score, the better the patient's ability to perform daily activities of living. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Primary Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) This self-administered questionnaire consists of 39 questions assessing the quality of life of individuals with Parkinson's disease across eight dimensions, including mobility, activities of daily living, emotional wellbeing, stigma, cognition, social support, communication, and bodily discomfort. The questions ask participants to rate the difficulty they experienced in various activities during the past month of living with Parkinson's disease. There are five response options for each question: Not at all, Occasionally, Sometimes, Often, and Always or cannot do at all, scored from 0 to 4, respectively. A higher score indicates greater difficulty experienced by the participant. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary Time up and go test (TUG) The change from baseline in mobility will be measured by the time taken as recorded. Before the test, the examinee sits steadily, readying for the test. Upon the examiner's cue, they stand from the chair and walk three meters, then turn, and sit back down. This duration is timed with a stopwatch by the examiner. To ensure accuracy, the test is repeated three times, averaging the times. The Timed Up and Go test serves as a swift, practical method for assessing functional mobility and pinpointing those at heightened fall risk or needing additional balance or gait training. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary Grip Strength measure The change from baseline in grip strength will be measured by the mean values to the norm according to participant's age and gender. The participant should sit with their upper arms naturally hanging down and their elbows bent at a 90-degree angle. Then, the participant should measure their grip strength three time, and the average of the three measurements should be analyzed. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary Pinch Strength measure The change from baseline in pinch grip will be measured by the mean values to the norm according to participant's age and gender. The participant should sit with their upper arms naturally hanging down and their elbows bent at a 90-degree angle. Then, the participant should measure their lateral /key pinch and palmar /three-jaw chuck pinch strength three times each, and the average of the three measurements for each method should be analyzed. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary Hand length measure Hand length is measured at baseline to provide information for adjusting the value of strength during statistical analysis. To measure the length of the hand, ask the participant to place their palm flat and facing up, and then measure the distance from the tip of the middle finger to the wrist crease. Baseline (before intervention)
Secondary The University of Pennsylvania Smell Inventory Test (UPSIT) Olfactory function can be tested using standardized quantitative assessment tools. Commonly used in research are the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and the smell threshold test. The method of testing smell identification primarily involves forty different scents. Test participants are required to smell the odors presented on each page of the test booklet and choose the correct answer from four options. Each item is scored one point, with a total possible score of forty. A higher score indicates better smell identification ability. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) This measurement is used to assess the cognitive function of participants and can effectively distinguish mild cognitive impairments. Initially developed for the diagnosis of dementia, it has since been widely used. The test takes about 10 minutes and measures seven cognitive domains, including visual-spatial/executive functions, naming, verbal memory registration and learning, attention, language, delayed memory, abstract thinking, and orientation. Each domain is scored differently, with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 points. Additionally, considering the impact of educational level, one extra point is added for individuals with less than 12 years of education. Lower scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment. Baseline (before intervention)
Secondary International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) The change from baseline in physical activity will be measured by IPAQ scores. Taiwan version has been testified validity and reliability. This questionnaire including four domains: Job, Transportation, Housework, Leisure. Duration and frequency of physical activity in the last 7 days will be measured. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) The change from baseline in sleep quality will be measured by PSQI scores. It is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over the past month. It consists of ten questions and covers various aspects of sleep such as sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. The questionnaire has 19 individual items, 7 component scores, and each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary WHOQOL-bref Taiwan version The change from baseline in quality of life will be measured by WHOQOL-bref scores.The questionnaire is simplified from the original six domains to four domains. This is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses quality of life based on personal feelings and subjective experiences in the past two weeks. It consists of 28 questions, each scored using a Likert scale with five points. The questionnaire covers four major domains: physical, psychological, social relationships, and environmental interactions. A higher score indicates a better quality of life. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
Secondary Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) The change from baseline in degree of fatigue will be measured by MFI total score. MFI is a self-administered questionnaire that asks the individual to recall their fatigue levels over the past two weeks. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions, including five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue. Each question is scored using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up ( 6 months after intervention)
Secondary Home activity log A customized diary format is utilized to aid participants in executing participants' self-management plans. It will be used within 6 weeks (within the intervention). The participants have to record their exercises each time (at least twice a week). The format encompasses logging dates, frequency, and duration of activities performed at home, along with any challenges or difficulties faced. These details are subsequently reviewed with the therapist in follow-up sessions. Within the intervention (6 weeks)
Secondary General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) The change from baseline in self-efficacy will be measured by GSE total score. The purpose of this test is to understand the individual's self-efficacy. The questionnaire consists of 10 items that assess the individual's feelings, thoughts, and actions. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale, with 1 indicating "completely incorrect," 2 indicating "somewhat correct," 3 indicating "mostly correct," and 4 indicating "completely correct." The final score is calculated by summing up the scores of all items. A higher score indicates better self-efficacy. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up ( 6 months after intervention)
Secondary The unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) The change from baseline in motor function will be measured by the motor subscore and disease severity will be measured by total scores of UPDRS. UPDRS is the most widely used clinical rating scale for Parkinson's disease.This scale is divided into four sections: The first covers mentation, behavior, and mood; the second assesses daily living activities; the third focuses on motor examination; and the fourth evaluates treatment complications. The lowest score is 0, indicating an absence of signs and symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Baseline (before intervention), week 6 (after intervention), follow-up (6 months after intervention)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05415774 - Combined Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT04691661 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Study of Radotinib in Parkinson's Disease Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05754086 - A Multidimensional Study on Articulation Deficits in Parkinsons Disease
Completed NCT04045925 - Feasibility Study of the Taïso Practice in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT04194762 - PARK-FIT. Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease. Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation N/A
Completed NCT02705755 - TD-9855 Phase 2 in Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (nOH) Phase 2
Terminated NCT03052712 - Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies N/A
Recruiting NCT05830253 - Free-living Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Using Smart Objects
Recruiting NCT03272230 - Assessment of Apathy in a Real-life Situation, With a Video and Sensors-based System N/A
Recruiting NCT06139965 - Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Comprehensive Coordination Scale in Parkinson's Patients
Completed NCT04580849 - Telerehabilitation Using a Dance Intervention in People With Parkinson's Disease N/A
Completed NCT04477161 - Effect of Ketone Esters in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Completed NCT03980418 - Evaluation of a Semiconductor Camera for the DaTSCAN™ Exam N/A
Completed NCT04942392 - Digital Dance for People With Parkinson's Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic N/A
Terminated NCT03446833 - LFP Beta aDBS Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT03497884 - Individualized Precise Localization of rTMS on Primary Motor Area N/A
Completed NCT05538455 - Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases N/A
Recruiting NCT04997642 - Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinical Database
Completed NCT04117737 - A Pilot Study of Virtual Reality and Antigravity Treadmill for Gait Improvement in Parkinson N/A
Recruiting NCT03618901 - Rock Steady Boxing vs. Sensory Attention Focused Exercise N/A