Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04071847
Other study ID # ABT-CIP-10300
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 26, 2019
Est. completion date September 2030

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Abbott Medical Devices
Contact Natalie Brill, PhD
Phone +15122864383
Email Natalie.Brill@abbott.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this international study is to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of Abbott deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems for all indications, including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or other disabling tremor and dystonia.


Description:

ADROIT is an international, prospective, multicenter, observational, post-market study intended to collect worldwide long-term safety and effectiveness data on subjects implanted with market-released Abbott DBS systems in routine clinical practice. Subjects will be followed for 5 years after the initial programming visit.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 1000
Est. completion date September 2030
Est. primary completion date September 2029
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is scheduled for a new implant or IPG device replacement surgery with a market-released Abbott DBS system within 180 days. 2. Subject, or a legally acceptable representative, must provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in an investigational study that may confound the results of this study. 2. Subject has anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the study results. 3. Study center is located in the United States, and indication for DBS implant is not Parkinson's disease or disabling tremor. 4. Study center is located in the United States, and the intended lead implant location is not at, or in close proximity to, the STN, GPi, or VIM thalamus.

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
Deep brain stimulation therapy involves the delivery of electrical signals to targeted structures in the brain to modulate neural circuit activity, and has been used successfully for the treatment of various types of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), disabling or essential tremor, and dystonia

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Royal Melbourne Hospital - City Campus Parkville Victoria
Australia Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland
Finland Helsinki University Central Hospital Helsinki Uusimaa
France CHU Gabriel Montpied Clermont Ferrand Auvergne
France CHU Hopital Pasteur Nice Provence-Alpes-Azur
France Fondation Rothchild Paris ILE
France CHU de St Etienne Saint-Étienne Auvergne
Germany Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität Düsseldorf Düsseldorf North Rhine-Westphalia
Germany UKE Hamburg (Universitatsklinik Eppendorf) Hamburg
Germany UNIVERSITATSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Mainz Rhineland-Palatinate
Germany Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster North Rhine-Westphalia
Germany Universitäts Klinikum Tübingen Tübingen Baden-Wurttemberg
Italy Az.Osp. Universitaria di Ferrara Cona Emilia-Romagna
Italy Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano Lombardy
Italy Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Roma Latium
Spain Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol Badalona Catalonia
Spain Hospital Universitario de la Princesa Madrid
Spain Hospital Virgen de Rocio Sevilla Andalusia
Taiwan Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital Hualien City
Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital LinKou Ntaiwan
United Kingdom Southmead Hospita Bristol South West England
United Kingdom Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow Wdbtshr
United Kingdom The Walton Centre Liverpool North West England
United Kingdom King's College Hospital London
United States Albany Medical Center Albany New York
United States Beth Israe Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts
United States Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois
United States The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
United States Ohio State Medical Columbus Ohio
United States Center for Interventional Pain & Spine Exton Pennsylvania
United States Wright State University & Premier Health Fairborn Ohio
United States Texas Movement Disorder Specialist Georgetown Texas
United States Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana
United States Kansas University Medical Center Kansas City Kansas
United States Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon New Hampshire
United States Colorado Neurodiagnostics Littleton Colorado
United States Neurosurgery One Littleton Colorado
United States Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California
United States University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky
United States University of Miami Hospital Miami Florida
United States Thomas Jefferson Department or Neurosurgery Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Allegheny General Hospital Department of Neurosurgery Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States University of California at Davis Sacramento California
United States University of Utah Hospital Salt Lake City Utah
United States Willis-Knighton Medical Center Shreveport Louisiana
United States University of South Florida - Department of Neurology Tampa Florida
United States University of Aizona Health Sciences Tucson Arizona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Abbott Medical Devices

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Finland,  France,  Germany,  Italy,  Spain,  Taiwan,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Baseline to 6 months
Primary Change from baseline to1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Baseline to1 year
Primary Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Baseline to 2 years
Primary Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Baseline to 3 years
Primary Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Baseline to 4 years
Primary Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS Part III. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assess the severity of Parkinson's disease. This questionnaire is composed of four sections: Part I: non-motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions (Part Ia is assessed by the investigator while part Ib is assessed by the subject, with or without the help of the caregiver); Part II: motor experiences of daily living consisting of 13 questions, designed to be self-administered; Part III: motor examinations consisting of 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores; Part IV: motor complications: consisting of 6 questions. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates normal, 1 indicates slight symptoms, 2 indicates mild symptoms, 3 indicates moderate symptoms, and 4 indicates severe symptoms. The total score for each part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores. Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Baseline to 5 years
Primary Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.
The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale.
Baseline to 6 months
Primary Change from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. Baseline to 1 year
Primary Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. Baseline to 2 years
Primary Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. Baseline to 3 years
Primary Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability. The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. Baseline to 4 years
Primary Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with disabling tremor, FTM-TRS. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) assesses tremor severity and and consists of three parts. Part A (with a maximum score of 80) rates tremor at rest, during posture, and intentional movements for nine parts of the body, including the head, trunk and limbs; Part B (with a maximum score of 36) rates action tremor of the upper limbs, particularly while writing and pouring liquids; part C the patient rates the impact of tremor on his or her functional disability (speaking, feeding, drinking, hygiene, dressing, writing, and working) with a maximum score of 28. The total score obtained by adding the three parts of the FTM-TRS is 144, with a higher score indicating higher disease severity/disability.The FTM-TRS also includes one separate item dealing with global assessment of tremor-related disability, rated by both patient and examiner on a 5-point scale. Baseline to 5 years
Primary Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. Baseline to 6 months
Primary Change from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. Baseline to 1 year
Primary Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. Baseline to 2 years
Primary Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. Baseline to 3 years
Primary Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. Baseline to 4 years
Primary Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with dystonia (except for cervical dystonia), BFMDRS movement scale. The BFMDRS consists consists of a movement subscale and a disability subscale. The movement scale measures dystonia in nine body regions (including the eyes, mouth, speech and swallowing, neck, trunk, arms, and legs). Each domain is scored on degree of provoking factor (0=no dystonia at rest or with action to 4=dystonia present at rest) and severity factor (0=no dystonia to 4=extreme/severe dystonia). Scores are weighted yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 120. The disability scale is a functional marker consisting of parental- or self-reported daily activities (involving speech, handwriting, feeding, eating, swallowing, hygiene, dressing, and walking), with scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 30 (completely dependent). A higher score indicates higher disease severity/disability. Baseline to 5 years
Primary Change from baseline to 6 months in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. Baseline to 6 months
Primary Change from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. Baseline to 1 year
Primary Change from baseline to 2 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. Baseline to 2 years
Primary Change from baseline to 3 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. Baseline to 3 years
Primary Change from baseline to 4 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. Baseline to 4 years
Primary Change from baseline to 5 years in disease-specific motor rating scale. For subjects with cervical dystonia, TWSTRS severity scale. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale rates the severity of cervical dystonia. This scale consists of three subscales measuring symptom severity, disability, and pain. The severity scale is rated by the clinician and is composed of 11 items with a maximum score of 35. The disability and pain scales are patient-rated. The disability scale is composed of 6 items with a maximum score of 30. The pain scale is composed of 3 items with a maximum score of 20. The total TWSTRS score ranges from 0 to 85 points. Higher scores indicate higher severity/disability/pain. Baseline to 5 years
Primary Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 6 months Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE).
a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.
v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
At 6 months
Primary Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 1 year Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE).
a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.
v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
At 1 year
Primary Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 2 years Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE).
a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.
v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
At 2 years
Primary Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 3 years Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE).
a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.
v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
At 3 years
Primary Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 4 years Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE).
a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.
v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
At 4 years
Primary Incidence of device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 5 years Serious Adverse Events related to the device and procedure will be assessed.
If the AE meets any of the criteria below, it is regarded as a serious adverse event (SAE).
a) Led to a death, b) Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in i) a life-threatening illness or injury, or ii) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or iii) in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.
v) chronic disease c) Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect.
At 5 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05415774 - Combined Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT04691661 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Study of Radotinib in Parkinson's Disease Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05754086 - A Multidimensional Study on Articulation Deficits in Parkinsons Disease
Completed NCT04045925 - Feasibility Study of the Taïso Practice in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT04194762 - PARK-FIT. Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease. Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation N/A
Completed NCT02705755 - TD-9855 Phase 2 in Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (nOH) Phase 2
Terminated NCT03052712 - Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies N/A
Recruiting NCT05830253 - Free-living Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Using Smart Objects
Recruiting NCT03272230 - Assessment of Apathy in a Real-life Situation, With a Video and Sensors-based System N/A
Recruiting NCT06139965 - Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Comprehensive Coordination Scale in Parkinson's Patients
Completed NCT04580849 - Telerehabilitation Using a Dance Intervention in People With Parkinson's Disease N/A
Completed NCT04477161 - Effect of Ketone Esters in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Completed NCT03980418 - Evaluation of a Semiconductor Camera for the DaTSCAN™ Exam N/A
Completed NCT04942392 - Digital Dance for People With Parkinson's Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic N/A
Terminated NCT03446833 - LFP Beta aDBS Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT03497884 - Individualized Precise Localization of rTMS on Primary Motor Area N/A
Completed NCT05538455 - Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases N/A
Recruiting NCT04997642 - Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinical Database
Completed NCT04117737 - A Pilot Study of Virtual Reality and Antigravity Treadmill for Gait Improvement in Parkinson N/A
Recruiting NCT03618901 - Rock Steady Boxing vs. Sensory Attention Focused Exercise N/A