Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02741947
Other study ID # RP 13/12
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date April 2014
Est. completion date December 2015

Study information

Verified date April 2016
Source IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The trial was an experimental two-centers, randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, non-inferiority cross-over study. Screened subjects already treated with Levodopa/Benserazide (LDB) (Madopar®) who agreed to participate in the study entered a 4 weeks period if not on stable regimen of Madopar® (run-in period). Following the run-in period, there were two maintenance periods of 4 weeks each, for a total duration of 8 weeks. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) by a computerized randomization system to one of two formulation sequences maintaining the dose stabilized during the run in: - generic-originator - originator-generic At the end of maintenance period 1, the patients in each formulation group underwent an overnight switch to the same dose of the alternative formulation. The dose was kept stable during the whole length of trial. Clinical evaluations were performed at the end of each period. The tablets were encapsulated to maintain the blindness. A pharmacokinetic study with a fixed dose (100+25 mg) was performed in a sub-population of 14 subjects. Population: out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease for at least 5 years, receiving L-dopa/benserazide. The total duration of the trial was approximately 8 weeks for patient divided in two maintenance periods of 4 weeks each.


Description:

The trial was an experimental two-centers, randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, non-inferiority cross-over study. Population: out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) for at least 5 years, receiving Levodopa, were enrolled to participate into the study. The study was performed in hospital setting using the facilities of the clinical trial centre in both sites involved in the study. The patients were recruited within the patient population using the hospitals out-patients clinics. Recruitment timing lasted 18 months. Screened subjects who agreed to participate in the study, taking Levodopa/Benserazide LDB (Madopar®) entered a 4 weeks period with stable regimen of Madopar® (run-in period). The formulations of levodopa admitted in the trial were: Madopar® 100+25; and 200+50 (1/2 or 1 tablet). Following the run-in period, there were two key phases of the study: two maintenance periods (4 weeks each), for a total duration of 8 weeks. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) by a computerized randomization system to one of two formulation sequences maintaining the dose stabilized during the run in: - generic-originator - originator-generic At the end of maintenance period 1, the patients in each formulation group underwent an overnight switching to the same dose of the alternative formulation. The dose was kept stable during the whole length of trial. Clinical evaluations were performed at the end of each period (see flow chart enclosed). The tablets were encapsulated to maintain the blindness. A pharmacokinetic study with a fixed dose (100+25 mg) was performed in a sub-population of 14 subjects. The drugs was administered orally. In case of prolonged, not tolerable akinetic periods during the study, the patients could be rescued with an extra dose of levodopa. Any antiparkinsonian treatment modification or supplementation of antiparkinsonian drugs was not allowed during the study. Any other drug not specific for Parkinson's disease was evaluated by the investigators and allowed only if necessary and if not interfering with the study drugs. The random allocation of patients to one of the two treatment groups was centrally managed by the coordinating centre, according to an automatically generated randomization list provided by the team responsible for the data collection monitoring and statistical analysis. An allocation ratio of 1:1 was assumed when generating the list. Patients eligible to enter the randomization procedure was sequentially assigned to the lowest randomization sequence number not yet assigned to any study subject. For each randomization number, a sealed envelope containing the randomization code was prepared by the team that generated the randomization list. Unblinding was permitted only if strictly necessary. In case it was essential to know the treatment assigned to a patient due to serious unexpected adverse events, the envelope containing the patient's randomization code could be open. In such cases, a detailed report on the timing, the causes and the patient's randomization number would have been issued by the person responsible for the trial and archived by the coordinating centre. Mechanical blinding (encapsulation) was used to ensure the double-blind nature of the study. Because the patients enrolled in the trial received levodopa/benserazide in different doses, over-encapsulation of tablets permitted blinding of most oral dosage forms: ½ tablet, several small tablets, capsules of different sizes or colors. Each capsule was then be placed in a narrow opaque tube and identified as "Treatment 1" and "Treatment 2" before administration to the patient. The patient, the investigator, Medical Monitor and Clinical Monitor remained blinded, whereas the site pharmacist and a nurse who administered study medication were not blind throughout this part of the study. No interim analysis was planned for this protocol. Amendments: no amendments were presented during the study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 44
Est. completion date December 2015
Est. primary completion date December 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 30 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria Out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease for at least 5 years, receiving L-dopa/benserazide, were enrolled to participate into the study. The patients were recruited within the patient population using the hospitals out-patients clinics. - Subject must be =30 and =75 years of age, of either sex and of any race. - Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease - Subjects in Hoehn and Yahr stages 2 to 4. - Subject must have good response to levodopa (=30% improvement in the UPDRS score). - Subject must have been on a stable regimen of L-dopa for at least 4 month before Screening. - A female subject must be postmenopausal, or sterile or use a medically accepted method of contraception. Fragile population was included in the trial (Elderly 65-74 years and over 75 years). Exclusion Criteria - Atypical Parkinsonism - Subjects with very severe motor fluctuations and/or dyskinesias. - Significant internal-medicine or psychiatric diseases. - Subject's clinical laboratory tests outside the normal ranges. - History of previous rhabdomyolysis - Subjects in therapy with Catechol-O-methyltransferase-inhibitor. - Subjects who participated in any other clinical trial in the 4 months before the screening. - Any subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding. - Subjects demented or not able to give informed consent to trial

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Levodopa Benserazide Madopar
Madopar 100+25mg and 200+50mg, tablet, tid e qid, for four weeks
Levodopa Benserazide Teva Italia
Levodopa benserazide Teva 100+25mg and 200+50mg, tablet, tid e qid, for four weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Irccs San Raffaele Pisana Rome

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (3)

Olanow CW, Agid Y, Mizuno Y, Albanese A, Bonuccelli U, Damier P, De Yebenes J, Gershanik O, Guttman M, Grandas F, Hallett M, Hornykiewicz O, Jenner P, Katzenschlager R, Langston WJ, LeWitt P, Melamed E, Mena MA, Michel PP, Mytilineou C, Obeso JA, Poewe W, — View Citation

Stocchi F, Jenner P, Obeso JA. When do levodopa motor fluctuations first appear in Parkinson's disease? Eur Neurol. 2010;63(5):257-66. doi: 10.1159/000300647. Epub 2010 Mar 24. — View Citation

Stocchi F. The levodopa wearing-off phenomenon in Parkinson's disease: pharmacokinetic considerations. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006 Jul;7(10):1399-407. doi: 10.1517/14656566.7.10.1399. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in bioequivalence in the total Area Under the Curve (AUC-t) between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. AUC-t: area under the curve within first and last observed point end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks)
Primary Change in therapeutic equivalence measured with the Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale part III between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. A difference of -3 points on the UPDRS motor score be the margin for non-inferiority end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks)
Secondary Change in Patient Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement scale between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks)
Secondary Change in bioequivalence in minimum concentration (Cmin) between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks)
Secondary Change in bioequivalence in time to maximum concentration (Tmax) after the last dose between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks)
Secondary Change in bioequivalence in the half life (t 1/2) after the last dose between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05415774 - Combined Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT04691661 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Study of Radotinib in Parkinson's Disease Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05754086 - A Multidimensional Study on Articulation Deficits in Parkinsons Disease
Completed NCT04045925 - Feasibility Study of the Taïso Practice in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT04194762 - PARK-FIT. Treadmill vs Cycling in Parkinson´s Disease. Definition of the Most Effective Model in Gait Reeducation N/A
Completed NCT02705755 - TD-9855 Phase 2 in Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (nOH) Phase 2
Terminated NCT03052712 - Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies N/A
Recruiting NCT05830253 - Free-living Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Using Smart Objects
Recruiting NCT03272230 - Assessment of Apathy in a Real-life Situation, With a Video and Sensors-based System N/A
Recruiting NCT06139965 - Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Comprehensive Coordination Scale in Parkinson's Patients
Completed NCT04580849 - Telerehabilitation Using a Dance Intervention in People With Parkinson's Disease N/A
Completed NCT03980418 - Evaluation of a Semiconductor Camera for the DaTSCAN™ Exam N/A
Completed NCT04477161 - Effect of Ketone Esters in Parkinson's Disease N/A
Completed NCT04942392 - Digital Dance for People With Parkinson's Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic N/A
Terminated NCT03446833 - LFP Beta aDBS Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT03497884 - Individualized Precise Localization of rTMS on Primary Motor Area N/A
Completed NCT05538455 - Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases N/A
Recruiting NCT04997642 - Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinical Database
Completed NCT04117737 - A Pilot Study of Virtual Reality and Antigravity Treadmill for Gait Improvement in Parkinson N/A
Recruiting NCT03618901 - Rock Steady Boxing vs. Sensory Attention Focused Exercise N/A