Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03972553
Other study ID # 19-398
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 25, 2019
Est. completion date November 27, 2023

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source The Cleveland Clinic
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This will be a randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing the retro-muscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retro-muscular keyhole mesh technique. The primary endpoint will be recurrence at two years. Secondary endpoints will be the incidence of mesh-related complications, all 30-day complication rates, and hospital length of stay. Patients eligible for the study will be 18 years or older with a parastomal hernia that requires open repair retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal as determined by one of five hernia surgeons who will participate in this study at the investigators' institution. All patients will be marked for a new stoma site preoperatively. Patients who have insufficient bowel length suitable for either technique will be excluded intraoperatively. Patients enrolled in the study will be entered in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database by the attending surgeon. The database houses patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, and postoperative outcomes - all entered by the attending surgeon.


Description:

Recent estimates approximate that 120,000 ostomies are created yearly, with an overall prevalence greater than 800,000. Parastomal hernia formation is the most common complication thereof, as most reviews acknowledge a rate of 50%, which increases to 75% for patients with a waist circumference >100cm. As patients live longer and rates of obesity climb, the sequelae of parastomal hernias do as well, including difficulty fitting stoma appliances, parastomal skin breakdown, pain, and obstructive episodes - all negatively impacting the patient's quality of life and compelling them to seek repair. Recent data from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) - a quality improvement hernia registry of surgeon-entered patient demographics, operative details, and outcomes - found that only 22% of stomas were reversible at the time of their parastomal hernia operation.[7] So in the vast majority of cases, the surgeon must decide the optimal technique for repair in the presence of a persistent stoma. Decision-making includes open versus laparoscopic approaches, stoma re-siting versus leaving it in situ, use of mesh, and mesh orientation relative to the bowel. The same AHSQC analysis found that mesh is used in 94% of repairs, and almost 80% are repaired open, likely due to the need for repair of a concomitant midline incisional hernia that frequently exists. As a high-volume hernia center, the investigators' preference has been to perform an open retromuscular repair with a transversus abdominis release (TAR) and retromuscular mesh placement, allowing for reinforcement of the midline, stoma, and prior stoma site if the stoma was re-sited. The stoma can be brought through a keyhole incision in the retromuscular mesh. The investigators' hernia recurrence rate at just 13-months mean follow-up was previously found to be 11%. A more recent audit of parastomal hernia repairs among the investigators using the aforementioned "keyhole" technique with a minimum of 1-year follow-up found a 17% rate of radiographic recurrence and 33% "composite" recurrence rate - patients who feel a bulge, regardless of their radiographic results. Recently, Pauli et al. reported the results of a novel technique for parastomal hernia repair at the 2018 International Hernia Congress with exciting early results. The technique is similar to the investigators' approach with a bilateral transversus abdominis release and placement of a retromuscular mesh reinforcement. However, rather than bringing the stoma through a keyhole defect in the mesh, it is draped over the mesh in the retromuscular space akin to a Sugarbaker repair offsetting the defect in the mesh and the fascia. Six surgeons reported their results of 44 patients with a mean follow-up of 10 months, with a 4.5% (n=2) recurrence rate, with no reports of mesh erosion or stoma necrosis. Given the excellent early results of this novel approach, the investigators hypothesize that the retromuscular Sugarbaker technique would dramatically reduce hernia recurrence compared to the traditional keyhole repair.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date November 27, 2023
Est. primary completion date November 27, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - The patient is willing and able to give informed consent - Patient has one parastomal hernia - Patient is willing to undergo mesh-based repair - Patient is considered eligible to undergo open retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal - The patient can tolerate general anesthesia - Repair being performed in an elective situation Exclusion Criteria: - The subject is <18 years of age - Patient has more than one stoma - The patient is unable to give informed consent - Patient is not willing to undergo mesh-based repair due to any reason - Patient not eligible for open retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal - Patient is unable to tolerate general anesthesia

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Sugarbaker technique for repairing parastomal hernia
The bowel will be brought through the peritoneum lateral to the edge of the retromuscular mesh and then draped over the mesh before bringing it through the anterior fascia medially.
Keyhole technique for repairing parastomal hernia
The bowel will be brought through defects in the posterior rectus sheath or contiguous peritoneum, mesh, and anterior fascia.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health Cleveland Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Clayton Petro

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (7)

Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):784-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4220. — View Citation

De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, Van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1806-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9366-5. Epub 2008 May 16. — View Citation

Gavigan T, Stewart T, Matthews B, Reinke C. Patients Undergoing Parastomal Hernia Repair Using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):393-403.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.658. Epub 2018 Aug 4. — View Citation

Hotouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL. The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):e202-14. doi: 10.1111/codi.12156. — View Citation

Raigani S, Criss CN, Petro CC, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Single-center experience with parastomal hernia repair using retromuscular mesh placement. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep;18(9):1673-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2575-4. Epub 2014 Jun 19. — View Citation

Timmermans L, Deerenberg EB, Lamme B, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Parastomal hernia is an independent risk factor for incisional hernia in patients with end colostomy. Surgery. 2014 Jan;155(1):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Nov 12. — View Citation

Turnbull GB. Ostomy statistics: the $64,000 question. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jun;49(6):22-3. No abstract available. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair To compare the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing a retromuscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retromuscular keyhole mesh technique. Two years after the last surgery
Secondary Incidence of mesh-related complications To compare the incidence of mesh-related complications between the two study groups. Two years after the last surgery
Secondary 30-day complication rates To compare all 30-day complication rates for the two study groups. 30 days after the last surgery
Secondary Hospital length-of-stay To compare hospital length-of-stay for the two study groups. An average of 1 week after the last surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT05514600 - Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT04311333 - Endostomal Three-dimensional Ultrasonography for Parastomal Hernia N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06077318 - Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia
Completed NCT01380860 - Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses N/A
Completed NCT00908661 - Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia N/A
Recruiting NCT04282473 - Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh
Completed NCT03792243 - Outcomes After Parastomal Hernia Repair
Recruiting NCT01955278 - Role of Prosthetic Mesh in Preventing Parastomal Hernias Phase 3
Terminated NCT00641342 - Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Primary Mesh Insertion Phase 2/Phase 3
Terminated NCT04966065 - Evaluation of the Parietex TM Parastomal No Hole Mesh for Repair of Parastomal Hernias in End-colostomies
Recruiting NCT04440514 - Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair (ePauli Repair)
Not yet recruiting NCT04950140 - Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Parastomal Hernia of the Oncology Patient N/A
Terminated NCT02489175 - Stomaplasty Ring (KoringTM) for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia N/A
Recruiting NCT03667287 - Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin N/A
Completed NCT01722565 - Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection Phase 4
Completed NCT02368873 - the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia N/A
Completed NCT02233465 - Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00917995 - Trial Concerning the Frequency of Parastomal Hernia With or Without a Mesh Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT01484743 - Risk Factors for Morbidity After Parastomal Hernia Repair
Completed NCT00509054 - Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh Phase 4