View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Filter by:Pancreatic cancer is a rapidly developing cancer with a poor prognosis. The mFOLFIRINOX protocol has become the standard medical treatment for this pathology. However, mFOLFIRINOX is the cause of severe toxicities including leukoneutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea-vomiting, anorexia, asthenia, weight loss and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Therefore, its indication is limited to patients in good general condition. In practice, it is often interrupted upon the occurrence of hematological and/or clinical grade 3-4 toxicities, Remote patient tele-monitoring of symptoms (Patient Reported Outcomes), body weight, circadian rhythms, sleep and activity would allow the identification of early warning signals reflecting deterioration or improvement in the health of these fragile patients, and trigger proactive interventions, while they are outside the hospital. Thus, the MultiDom study proposes a comprehensive tele-monitoring and telecare strategy that would complement standard of care over a 7-weeks period to 42 consenting patients. The patients receive neoadjuvant or first line chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer at one of four centres in Ile-de-France region (France).
The proposed ONE TEAM Study is an 18-month, cluster randomized controlled trial. This study will use a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design with a second randomization for the intervention group using a dynamic treatment regimen approach. The investigators propose to randomize 800 adults with newly-diagnosed selected cancers treated with curative intent (breast, prostate, colorectal, endometrial, non-small cell lung, and endometrial) and with >1 selected cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidity (hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia). Participants will be enrolled through Duke Cancer Institute and two community-based oncology practices, both settings serving socio-demographically diverse populations. The unit of randomization will be the PCP clinic; there will be ~80 PCP clinics across North Carolina involved in the study. The overarching goals of this study are to improve chronic disease management and communication among cancer survivors by engaging PCPs as active members of the cancer care team and reframing the message to cancer survivors and providers. A diversity supplement with retrospective and qualitative components has been added to abstract older adults with solid tumors who underwent cancer surgery at DUHS. Aims include (1) to estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular complications ≤90 postoperative days among older adults with solid tumors undergoing surgery, and its association with care coordination between surgical providers and PCPs ; (2) to develop a risk index for cardiovascular complications ≤90 days of surgery among older adult patients with a solid tumor; and (3) to Assess experience and perceptions of PCPs on care coordination with surgical providers of older adults with a solid tumor following cancer surgery.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains a dreadful disease due to its often advanced stage at diagnosis and poor sensitivity to chemotherapy. Progression after 1. line chemotherapy is inevitable in patients with advanced PC, and treatment options for patients who progress after 1. line chemotherapy are limited. Considering the emerging role of the tumor microenvironment (TME), the combination of checkpoint blocking antibodies with agents that target the inhibitory effects of the TME could lead to better responses in tumor historically resistant to checkpoint blocking antibody approaches. Inflammation is one of the hallmarks of cancer, and contributes to PC initiation, enhanced invasiveness and metastasis. The immune-modulating cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) facilitates the inflammation cascade and key pathways within the respective TME, among others promotion of tumor-induced immunosuppression and facilitation of metastasis. Thus, IL-6 inhibition approach can potentially directly affect the immunosuppressive TME compartment. To explore the synergy of the proposed combinatorial approach, participants with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic tumors who have progressed during or after at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy in the metastatic setting will receive nivolumab and ipilimumab administered in combination with radiotherapy and tocilizumab. It is anticipated that this clinical study will inform the use of this 3-drug combination for further phase II and/or phase III clinical testing.
To determine recommended phase 2 dose and to evaluate the safety of vactosertib in combination with nal-IRI/FL in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have failed first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in many cases is completely unforeseen by the patient, who often faces a disease that is already at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. The clinical visit during which the diagnosis is communicated together with the first information regarding the planned treatments is of paramount importance. It is hypothesized that the clarity of such information is able to influence patients's engagement and thus the compliance. AIMS: The aim of this study is to collect quantitative data on the level of PDAC patient engagement and the rate of understanding of the information received from the doctor, and investigate the possible association between these two variables and with the patient's level of compliance. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional cohort study focused on patients diagnosed with PDAC, approved by the Ethics Committee of the San Raffaele Hospital. As no preliminary data are available on the association between PDAC patient's understanding rate and their level of engagement and of compliance no power calculation is possible. This is a pilot study, aimed at enrolling at least 45 PDAC patients during a 3 months frame. CONCLUSION: COMMUNI.CARE will be the first study specifically investigating whether there is a relation between PDAC patients' rate of understanding, their engagement and compliance at time of diagnosis.
A multi-center, open-label phase I/II study to to determine the safety and tolerability of Azacitidine and/or Romidepsin in combination with nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (Part 1), followed by sequential immune targeting with programmed death-ligand (PD-L)1 blockade in combination with low-dose Lenalidomide (Part 2) in patients with controlled disease after 3 cycles (Part 1).
This study is designed to develop a cohort of individuals without pancreatic cancer, but who are at increased risk of developing it due to family history or genetic predisposition. These high-risk individuals will be asked to provide baseline and annual (serial) follow-up blood samples for the duration of the study funding. Mayo Clinic is part of a national Pancreatic Cancer Detection Consortium (PCDC)[1] which aims to establish a high-risk cohort with the goal of validating blood biomarkers (discovered/developed outside of this protocol) using the samples collected serially (annually) that predict or detect pancreatic cancer prior to clinical diagnosis.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a dreadful disease due to its often advanced stage at diagnosis and poor sensitivity to chemotherapy. A locally unresectable tumor (locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)) is present in 30% of the cases and is defined as a surgically unresectable tumor encasing the adjacent arteries [celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA)]. In these patients, chemotherapy has been the standard treatment for decades, optionally combined with radiotherapy. Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) comprise a group of patients with PDAC who are at a high risk of having positive margins if upfront resection is pursued. In addition, multiple studies have reported these patients have increased probability of early recurrence of local and systemic disease resulting in poorer outcomes. Although some patients are treated with an aggressive surgery-first approach and adjuvant systemic therapies, a preoperative chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation approach is becoming more common for all patients with BRPC, and this strategy is adapted in Danish and international guidelines. Majority of patients present with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Therapy options are limited by chemotherapy in palliative setting. The superiority of the FOLFIRINOX regimen demonstrated in the phase III mPC setting led many centers to investigate FOLFIRINOX with or without chemoradiotherapy in patients with LAPC tumor. Gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel is the approved first-line treatment for patients with advanced PC. This regimen showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.5 months and is the predominantly used regimen in metastatic PC. The role of radiation therapy in the management of nonresectable PC remains controversial. The results of small randomized trials comparing chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy of patients with LAPC are divergent. Immunotherapy has emerged as a therapeutic approach that offers effective and durable treatment options for subsets of patients with various types of cancer. However, these successes have not manifested similar benefits for PDAC patients mostly due to a lack of pre-existing T-cell immunity and/or a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Considering the emerging role of the TME, the combination of checkpoint blocking antibodies with agents that target the inhibitory effects of the TME could lead to better responses in tumor historically resistant to checkpoint blocking antibody approaches. For example, in heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic PDAC, preliminary data from the phase 2 study CHECKPAC (NCT02866383) showed that checkpoint inhibition in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provided durable clinical benefit in a small proportion of patients, including prolonged, sustained partial responses. Furthermore, the addition of standard-of-care chemotherapy could further potentiate the anti-tumor effects of immunotherapy approaches by reducing the tumor burden, exposing antigens, and directly affecting the immunosuppressive TME compartment. To explore the safety and synergy of the proposed combinatorial approach, participants with borderline resectable, locally advanced or mPC will receive nivolumab and ipilimumab administered in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel followed by immune-chemoradiation.
This study evaluated the feasibility and reliability of PDAC molecular subtyping on tissue core biopsies samples acquired under EUS guidance. Moreover, this study will assess the impact of molecular subtypes assessed on EUS-FNB samples in patients with resectable and unresectable (locally advanced, advanced, and metastatic) PDAC undergoing chemotherapy on treatment response and survival and the utility in monitoring disease response to therapy and early occurrence of disease relapse using the TaqMan RNA assay in serum
This is a non-randomized, multicenter, non-interventional study in patients with resectable PDAC. The patients are allocated to two observation groups according preoperative presence of ctDNA (Group A) or absence of detectable ctDNA (Group B) as determined in a liquid biopsy. After successful surgery of their pancreatic tumor and completion of local histological evaluation, tissue samples will be analyzed with regard to their mutational status with. Within 14 days before start of adjuvant tumor therapy another liquid biopsy will be taken to reassess the level of ctDNA after surgery. Patients will be monitored for disease recurrence according to harmonized, institutional standards using clinical, laboratory and (cross-sectional) imaging modalities. Accordingly, patients will be assessed every three months in the first eighteen months after surgery and every six months thereafter or based on clinical need for 36 months after the date of surgery Follow up will be documented until occurrence of relapse (or death if death occurs earlier than relapse/progression) for a maximum of 36 months after the date of surgery.