View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Cancer.
Filter by:This is a phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy of a personalized neoepitope yeast-based vaccine, YE-NEO-001, in subjects who have completed potentially curative therapy for their solid cancer and who would otherwise be entering a period of surveillance for recurrent disease.
Patients with resectable solid primary cancers and even limited number of metastases are potentially curable. However, most patients develop recurrences despite surgery. Also, early detection of lung cancer with low dose CT screening may cure patients at an early stage. Circulating and disseminated tumor cell (CTC/DTC) and circulating cell-free (cf) DNA isolation from the blood, urine and bone marrow will increase understanding of cancer spread and advance knowledge to develop individualized therapies and improve screening.
We are going to establish "organoid" models from pancreatic cancer biopsies achieved via EUS-FNA. Then the sensitivity of the selected FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs will be tested in these organoids.
This study aims to asses the effect of warfarin on markers of AXL pathway in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease. The 1-year and 5-year survival rate is approximately 20% and <5% respectively. The treatment options available are limited. Only around 10-20% of patients present early enough to undergo surgical resection. Furthermore, chemotherapy for more advanced pancreatic cancer leads to limited survival benefit and can cause significant side effects. One of the main obstacles to developing new treatments for pancreatic cancer is the limited understanding of how pancreatic cancer cells change/evolve/adapt following treatment. This study is a pilot study to assess whether the investigators can track gene expression (using a technique called RNA sequencing) in pancreatic cancer cells between two separate time points. Investigators intend to take a tissue sample (biopsy) of the cancer using endoscopy ultrasound (EUS) and compare it with samples taken either at the time of surgery in those patients with resectable disease or follow-up EUS derived biopsies in irresectable cancers. The interval between endoscopy and follow-up EUS or surgery will be approximately 2 to 3 weeks and reflects the standard period of time that patients wait from the time point at which the cancer is deemed to be operable (in the multi-disciplinary team meeting) to the actual operation. If the investigators find that the samples (biopsies) taken at EUS and at surgery or follow-up EUS are comparable they plan to develop future clinical trials of similar design but with the addition of drug therapy. The investigators will use RNA sequencing to interrogate the effects of novel cancer drugs on gene expression within the tumour. This will give them information on how to select patients for therapy, how resistance develops to these treatments, and allow the investigators to better understand what treatments can be combined on a rational basis. However, prior to undertaking such studies it is important to understand how much variability there is in gene expression between sampling at 2 different time points at which two different techniques are used.
Purpose: To compare the radiation exposure in patients during Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) done by Endoscopists formally trained in judicious use of fluoroscopy versus ERCPs done by Endoscopists without such formal training. Research design: This is an observational study to compare radiation exposure in patients during ERCPs based on formal training. Procedures to be used: None Risks and potential benefits There are no risks associated with this study as it is a retrospective chart review. Potential benefits include the knowledge gained from this study which may be of help to patients in the future. Importance of knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result The knowledge gained from this study may be of help to provide new insights and develop newer guidelines for radiation use in the future.
The aim of the present prospective study was, first, to verify the correlation between biliary colonization and postoperative infectious complications, and secondarily to asses morbidity and mortality for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The hypothesis is that a proportion of post-operative infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy is due to bacteria that colonize the bile ducts during the preoperative period.
Pancreatic cancers represent a challenge for the multidisciplinal team. A patient-tailored treatment plan requires an accurate preoperative staging. Currently more than 40% of patient taken to the OR are actually unresectable and another 40% will shortly recur with dismal prognosis. Among patients that meet upfront surgery some would have benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and vice versa. Accuracy of preoperative staging is of primary importance in treatment decisional making. Due to its location, invasive preoperative diagnostic tests on pancreatic cancer are expensive and risky. Liquid biopsy provides a non-invasive signature of the tumor. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinic-pathological features and likely on its progression. This study would be the first -in our knowledge- analyzing the relationship of a pattern of 4 major genes involved in pancreatic cancer progression on liquid biopsy and the time to recurrence and T-stage, with particular attention to vascular invasion. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation, an optimal treatment plan and improves patient's outcomes.
This study is being done to test whether receiving a dose of radiation that is higher than the standard dose, in combination with chemotherapy, improves the chance of becoming a candidate for surgery and improves the chance of extending the patient's life.
This research study is a two stage study which consists of a safety run-in phase and a randomized phase 2 study which include subjects with previously-untreated, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In the run-in safety study, the safety of adding two formulations (IV or Oral) of paricalcitol to a standard chemotherapy program of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel will be evaluated. The randomized phase 2 study will evaluate the efficacy of paricalcitol when added to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel The drugs involved in this study are: - Paricalcitol - Gemcitabine - Nab-paclitaxel