View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Cancer.
Filter by:Assessment of the effectiveness of care in certified cancer centres for eight cancer entities via a retrospective cohort study based on secondary data from statutory health insurance funds and population-based clinical cancer registries.
This study is evaluating the effect of two pre-test education methods on participants interested in genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.
Study investigators aim to assess the effect of providing high-protein nutritional supplementation before and after surgery
Study to assess the safety and tolerability of repeated doses of an investigational new drug in patients with cancer and cachexia.
Identifying the malignancy of pancreatic mass using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is important for treatment decision-making and prognosis prediction. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA cytology specimens based on Papanicolaou (Pap) staining is low, which hampers accurate diagnosis of pancreatic mass. We assessed the diagnostic value of immunohistochemical (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining for methionyl-tRNA synthetase 1 (MARS1).
The aim of the proposed study is to understand the palliative care needs of patients with pancreatic cancer, to investigate whether early palliative care can improve patient outcomes and reduce use of health care services, and to understand the psychological health of carers and their satisfaction with care. A quasi-experimental design is used, introducing palliative care for patients with pancreatic cancer within three weeks from diagnosis. The patients are recruited in Dept. of Surgery, Hospital of North Zealand, which covers the northern catchment area of the Capital Region of Copenhagen, Denmark. Patients are seen by the palliative care team on home-visits every four weeks throughout their trajectory, and quality of life is evaluated using the following quality of life questionnaires (QLQs): European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients receiving palliative care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Pancreatic Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-PAN26), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). For carers, mental health is evaluated using HADS and satisfaction with care is evaluated using the Family Caregivers' Satisfaction With Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer Questionnaire (FAMCARE-2). The primary outcome is health care service use (acute hospital admissions, days in hospital). Secondary outcomes are survival and place of death. Data are compared with historical control patients treated in the same hospital before introduction of early palliative care. These outcomes are readily available from patient records and are expected to carry a very low risk of bias. Palliative care needs at referral in the study group will be compared with palliative care needs in the subgroup of historical control patients referred to palliative care on-demand. For outcomes where unbiased historical control data are not available a prospective observational approach is used. These include symptom burden, weight, psychological health and satisfaction with care. The minimum sample size needed to show a clinically significant decrease in acute hospital admissions is 70, 35 participating in the prospective study and 35 historical control patients. The study will include 40-50 patients and their carers from September 2019 to September 2020.
1. Based on the literature, the pancreatic cancer treatment predictor biomarker, which is used in the domestic clinical field, is actually applied to the pancreatic cancer patient cohort of the National Cancer Center. 2. To systematically prospectively identify prospective treatment response biomarkers for Pancreatic Cancer Cohort in the National Cancer Center
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in many cases is completely unforeseen by the patient, who often faces a disease that is already at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. The clinical visit during which the diagnosis is communicated together with the first information regarding the planned treatments is of paramount importance. It is hypothesized that the clarity of such information is able to influence patients's engagement and thus the compliance. AIMS: The aim of this study is to collect quantitative data on the level of PDAC patient engagement and the rate of understanding of the information received from the doctor, and investigate the possible association between these two variables and with the patient's level of compliance. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional cohort study focused on patients diagnosed with PDAC, approved by the Ethics Committee of the San Raffaele Hospital. As no preliminary data are available on the association between PDAC patient's understanding rate and their level of engagement and of compliance no power calculation is possible. This is a pilot study, aimed at enrolling at least 45 PDAC patients during a 3 months frame. CONCLUSION: COMMUNI.CARE will be the first study specifically investigating whether there is a relation between PDAC patients' rate of understanding, their engagement and compliance at time of diagnosis.
The study consists of 2 parts. Part 1 is dose escalation and will first administer SY-5609 alone to participants with select advanced solid tumors and then in combination with fulvestrant to participants with HR positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Part 2 is a dose expansion and will first administer SY-5609 in combination with gemcitabine and then SY-5609 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in participants with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) .
The purpose of this study is to see if continuous glucose monitoring can identify how often people who have pre-diabetes or medical obesity or well-controlled diabetes experience very high glucose values while receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer or pancreatic.