View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Cancer.
Filter by:Chronic inflammation and immune dysfunction play a key role in the development of tumors. The aim of the study is to investigate the predictive value of SII and PALBI grade for the patients with pancreatic cancer surgery.
The purpose of the registry is to collect data on the performance of the focused ultrasound (FUS) technology and health outcomes. A wide variety of approaches exist for using FUS on pancreatic cancer patients, and the primary goal is to capture this broad spectrum of approaches and their impact on patients overall health. This information will help provide a better understanding of current care, and may possibly direct further, more specific investigations that will follow this registry.
This is an open-label, dose escalation, dose expansion and extension cohort phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumor activity of SYSA1801
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a solid malignancy with a dismal prognosis. It has a 5-year survival rate of approximately 8%. This is due to the usually late diagnosis, to chemoresistance, and to intrinsic biological aggressiveness. Risk factors for PC are smoking, alcohol, chronic pancreatitis, obesity, and diabetes. Recently, research has been dedicated to the identification of a causal connection between certain pathogenic microorganisms, especially of the oral flora, and PC. This would ultimately allow to identify new biomarkers to adopt for early diagnosis, or to create new strategies for prevention. Oral microbiota, periodontal disease and neoplastic risk When referring to "oral microbiota" (OM), about 700 hundreds bacterial species are mentioned, colonizing the oral cavity. A change in the normal flora of the oral cavity is commonly indicated with the term "dysbiosis". The causal connection between oral microbiota, periodontal disease and neoplastic risk is possibly triple. First, it has been found that oral flora substantially differentiates between cancer patients and controls. In particular, the most predominant phyla in cancer patients are Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, whereas Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Bacteroides are more common in healthy controls. This highlights the possibility of a direct causal connection between dysbiosis and neoplastic risk. Second, oral dysbiosis represents the main risk factor of PD that per sé is a risk factor of many cancers. Third, the conditions leading to oral dysbiosis (alcohol, smoking, obesity, diabetes, chronic drugs intake, dietary habits, etc.) are the most well known risk factors either for cancer and oral dysbiosis. The common denominator is always represented by chronic inflammation and migration of microorganisms to distant sites, ultimately promoting neoplastic progression. This tangled net of causal connections sheds light on the potential important role of the oral cavity and PD as independent risk factors for many cancers, and as modifiable elements to reduce the neoplastic risk and to perform prevention(15). Oral microbiota, periodontal disease and pancreatic cancer In 2012, the pioneering study by Farrell et al. showed that bacteria of the OM can discriminate PC patients from healthy subjects. Since then, few other studies have shown that changes of the OM are independent risk factors for PC and that the OM of PC patients differs than controls. The involved bacterial species are many and their role seems to be contrasting on the basis of the study considered. Farrell et al. found that the combined adoption of Neisseria elongata and Streptococcus mitis distinguished PC patients from healthy controls (both showed low levels in PC patients, AUC of combined sensitivity 0.9), and that higher levels of Granulicatella adiacens and Streptococcus Mitis distinguished PC patients from chronic pancreatitis ones. Torres et al. found a higher ratio of Leptotrichia to Porphyromonas in PC patients. Fan et al. reported that Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Alloprevotella and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans are associated with a higher risk of PC, whereas Fusobacteria and Leptotrichia were associated with a decreased risk. Another study evaluating the diversity of OM in three groups of individuals (PC patients, patients suffering from Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [a pancreatic preneoplastic condition], and healthy controls), excluding current smokers and users of antibiotics, found no differences in the OM, although patients with PC had a higher proportion of Firmicutes compared with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs) and controls. Lastly, a recent study by Gaiser et al. showed that the cystic fluid of patients submitted to surgery for IPMNs contained bacterial species that are commonly found in the oral cavity, including, among the others, Granulicatella adiacens, Fusobacterium nucleatum. These two, in particular, were higher in the cohort of individuals with IPMNs with high-grade dysplasia, indicating a pivotal role in tumorigenesis(19). As regards PD, the first studies demonstrating an association between PD and PC date back to the mid of 2000's, and they were confirmed afterward, even adjusting confounders such as diabetes, pancreatitis, hyperlipemia, smoking or alcohol-related conditions. PD is strictly connected to oral hygiene, that seems to be associated to an increased risk of PC. It is now clear that PD can concur to development of PC in several ways, promoting chronic inflammation, spreading continuously to distant organs (including pancreas) pro-tumorigenic bacteria, or promoting a chronic alteration of the immune function that make the individual more prone to develop a cancer.
The past 15 years, using National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database and K-PaC registry, and to analyze the cost and cost-effectiveness along with the change in survival rate after the emergence of the aforementioned regimens, which is very important for policy decisions such as reimbursement of second-line treatment.
Objective: To collect information on how often a solid tumor cancer might lose the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) by next generation sequencing and perform apheresis to collect and store an eligible participant's own T cells for future use to make CAR T-Cell therapy for their disease treatment. Design: This is a non-interventional, observational study to evaluate participants with solid tumors with a high risk of relapse for incurable disease. No interventional therapy will be administered on this study. Some of the information regarding the participant's tumor analysis may be beneficial to management of their disease. Participants that meet all criteria may be enrolled and leukapheresed (blood cells collected). The participant's cells will be processed and stored for potential manufacture of CAR T-cell therapy upon relapse of their cancer.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of orally administered TT-4 in subjects with advanced selected solid tumors. The dose escalation portion of the study will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TT-4.
This open-label, First-into-Human (FIH) study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and early efficacy of AVA6000, a FAP-activated pro-drug of doxorubicin, in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic solid tumours. In Phase Ia, using a 3+3 design, escalating doses of AVA6000 will be administered to patients with a range of solid tumour types to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). In Phase 1b, the selected RP2D dose will be assessed in one to three tumour types.
CLDN 18.2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells Clinical research plan for the treatment of recurrent or refractory pancreatic cancer.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows EUS-guided trans gastric injection of absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac plexus (celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN)), to help alleviate pain associated with pancreatic cancer. It is standard procedure to inject bupivacaine immediately before injecting absolute alcohol, to theoretically prevent pain that may occur during and after the procedure. However, there are no data showing whether bupivacaine injection has any real influence on intra-procedural, immediate post-procedural, or long-term pain control. The injection of bupivacaine before the alcohol may have no effect, a synergistic effect, or an antagonistic effect, by diluting the alcohol, and reducing its neurolytic capacity. Inadvertent intravascular injection of bupivacaine may also cause irreversible cardiac arrhythmias and death. The investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the exclusion of bupivacaine during EUS-guided CPN improves outcomes, or not.