A Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 400mg/Day Lacosamide in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 400mg/Day Lacosamide in Subjects With Painful Distal Diabetic Neuropathy Using Two Different Titration Schemes

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00350103
• Other study ID #: SP0874
• Secondary ID: 2005-005788-27
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: June 30, 2006
• Est. completion date: June 29, 2007

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: UCB Pharma
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this trial is to assess whether 400mg/day of lacosamide is effective in reducing pain caused by distal diabetic neuropathy. Two dose-escalation schemes for lacosamide will be used to further determine the efficacy of the "standard" scheme and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a more rapid titration scheme. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Subjects in two of the groups will receive lacosamide at a dose of 400mg/day, but different dose-escalation schemes will be used to reach this final dose. The third group of subjects will receive a placebo. Subjects will have a 2 in 3 (66 %) chance of getting lacosamide. The maximum lacosamide dose in this trial will be 400mg/day. The maximum treatment duration will be 18 weeks, including a two-week Pre-Treatment Phase and a 12 weeks period on a stable dose of lacosamide or placebo.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 551
• Est. completion date: June 29, 2007
• Est. primary completion date: June 29, 2007
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subject has had symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy for at least 6 months and has a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type I or Type II).

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subject has previously participated in this trial or subject has previously been assigned to treatment in a trial of the drug under investigation in this trial

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Diabetic Neuropathies
• Pain
• Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
• Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

Intervention

Drug:
• SPM 929
Pharmaceutical form: Immediate release film-coated tablets Concentration: 50mg/ 100mg Route of administration: Oral use
• Placebo
Pharmaceutical form: Immediate release film-coated tablets Route of administration: Oral use

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
UCB Pharma	SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES GmbH - Part of UCB Group

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (1)

Bainbridge J, De Backer M, Eckhardt K, Tennigkeit F, Bongardt S, Sen D, Werhahn KJ, Shaibani A, Faught E. Safety and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy in the elderly: A subgroup analysis from lacosamide trials in diabetic neuropathic pain. Epilepsia — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline Week to the Last 4 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the last available 28 days of maintenance for participants completing the maintenance phase (or the last 28 days prior to discontinuation for participants who discontinued in the titration or maintenance phase) and the average of the Baseline week.	Last 4 weeks of Maintenance Phase, compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Time to Sustainable Pain Relief	Time to sustainable pain relief was defined as the time from Baseline to the first day on which there was a =1-point improvement over Baseline in the Likert pain score for those subjects for whom there was also =30% reduction in average daily pain score over the last 28 days of the Maintenance Phase as compared to Baseline.	From start of trial medication intake (Week 0) up to the last 4 weeks of the Maintenance Phase
Secondary	Percentage of Subjects With >= 30% or >= 2-point Reduction of with-in Subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to the Last 4 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening.	Baseline week, last 4 weeks of the Maintenance Phase
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to Visit 3	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline week, Visit 3
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to Visit 4	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline week, Visit 4
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to Visit 5	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline week, Visit 5
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to Visit 6	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline week, Visit 6
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to Visit 7	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline week, Visit 7
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to Visit 8	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline week, Visit 8
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to the Titration Phase	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the titration phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Titration Phase (4 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to the Maintenance Phase	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the maintenance phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Maintenance Phase (12 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to the Treatment Phase	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the treatment phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Treatment Phase (16 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change in Average Daily Pain Score From the Baseline Week to the Last 4 Weeks of Maintenance Phase	An 11-point Likert scale is used to assess the subject's average daily pain. This scale is completed by the subject twice daily (once in the morning and once in the evening). The subject rates his/her average pain over the last 12 hours, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The daily pain score is defined as the average score of those collected in the morning and evening. A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the last available 28 days of maintenance for participants completing the maintenance phase (or the last 28 days prior to discontinuation for participants who discontinued in the titration or maintenance phase) and the average of the Baseline week.	Last 4 weeks of Maintenance Phase, compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 3 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2.	Baseline Week, Visit 3
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 4 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2.	Baseline Week, Visit 4
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 5 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2.	Baseline Week, Visit 5
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 6 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2.	Baseline Week, Visit 6
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 7 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2.	Baseline Week, Visit 7
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 8 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2.	Baseline Week, Visit 8
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Titration Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the titration phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Titration Phase (4 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Maintenance Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the maintenance phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Maintenance Phase (12 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Treatment Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms. A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the treatment phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Treatment Phase (16 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Last 4 Weeks of Maintenance Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's Sleep	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A lower value on the scale indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative change value indicates improvement from Baseline. Baseline Week was defined as the average of pain interference scores at the last 7 days prior to Visit 2. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the last available 28 days of maintenance for participants completing the maintenance phase (or the last 28 days prior to discontinuation for participants who discontinued in the titration or maintenance phase) and the average of the Baseline week.	Last 4 weeks of Maintenance Phase, compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 3 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline Week, Visit 3
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 4 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline Week, Visit 4
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 5 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline Week, Visit 5
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 6 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline Week, Visit 6
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 7 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline Week, Visit 7
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to Visit 8 in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline.	Baseline Week, Visit 8
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Titration Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the titration phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Titration Phase (4 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Maintenance Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the maintenance phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Maintenance Phase (12 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Treatment Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the treatment phase and the average of the Baseline Week.	Treatment Phase (16 weeks), compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Within-subject Change From the Baseline Week to the Last 4 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase in Daily Perception of Pain Interference With Subject's General Activity	An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's general activity. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement from Baseline. The value reported below is calculated as a difference between the average of the last available 28 days of maintenance for participants completing the maintenance phase (or the last 28 days prior to discontinuation for participants who discontinued in the titration or maintenance phase) and the average of the Baseline week.	Last 4 weeks of Maintenance Phase, compared to the Baseline Week
Secondary	Percentage of Days of Rescue Medication Use During the Treatment Phase	Percentage of days of rescue medication use was the number of days in the visit/trial phase with rescue medication use divided by the total number of days in the visit/trial phase times 100.	During the Treatment Phase (up to 16 weeks)
Secondary	Within-subject Change From Baseline to Visit 8 in Subject's Quality of Life	Quality of life was analyzed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 contribute to the physical component Summary (PCS) score. Items 5-8 contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive change value indicates improvement from baseline. As pre-specified in SAP, values were planned to be summarized and disclosed by placebo and LCM 400 mg/day (pooled) groups.	Baseline, Visit 8
Secondary	Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 8	The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. As pre-specified in SAP, values were planned to be summarized and disclosed by placebo and LCM 400 mg/day (pooled) reporting groups.	Visit 8
Secondary	Percentage of Patients With Categorized Satisfaction With Medications at Visit 8	Categories of satisfaction are as following: very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied/dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, not applicable, not done (no data available).	Visit 8
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Visit 8	The MOS Sleep scale is used to assess the subject's quality of sleep. The scale consists of 12 individual items categorized into two sleep problems indices (SPI I/II) and 5 subscales: sleep disturbance, sleep somnolence, snoring, short of breath (SoB) or headache, sleep adequacy. Scores range from 0 to 100. Sleep adequacy scale: High values indicate a high quality of sleep. A positive change indicates improvement in quality of sleep. All other Sleep Scales: Low values indicate a high quality of sleep. A negative change indicates improvement in quality of sleep.	Baseline, Visit 8

External Links

•   Clinical Study Summary on UCB.com
•   FDA Safety Alerts and Recalls