Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04022811
Other study ID # 2018KYPJ101
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date October 2016
Est. completion date October 2017

Study information

Verified date July 2019
Source Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To evaluate the efficacy and ocular safety of bromfenac ophthalmic solution (bromfenac) 0.1% dosed twice daily for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after pterygium excision with amniotic membrane transplantation(AMT).


Description:

Patients scheduled to undergo pterygium excision with AMT were randomized to receive added topical bromfenac or artificial lacrima at 3 days before and 7 days after the surgery. Pain intensity was evaluated with the visual analog scale(VAS) and present pain index(PPI) with the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. psychological state used Self-rating of Depression Scale(SDS) and Self-rating of Anxiety Scale (SAS) to assess. Ocular inflammation was assessed with an automated bulbar redness grading technique. The irritative symptoms evaluation was carried out by an independent investigator at each visit with questionnaires of ocular symptom scores(OSS). Corneal epithelial healing rate was calculated after following up. All patients had follow-ups at the day 1, day 3, day7 and day 10.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date October 2017
Est. primary completion date October 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 45 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with unilateral or double pterygium

2. The gender is not limited, age 45-75 years old

3. intraocular pressure <21mmHg

4. follow the preoperative and postoperative drug regimen and ensure regular follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient factors: lack of cooperation and poor compliance.

2. Severe dry eye, Sjogren's syndrome, cicatricial pemphigoid, and other systemic diseases that seriously affect the structure or function of the ocular surface.

3. Glaucoma or high intraocular pressure (above 21 mmHg), active uveitis, retinal detachment and other diseases.

4. History of systemic diseases, such as uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension, rosacea, severely impaired cardiopulmonary function or other diseases that cannot tolerate surgery; central nervous system disorders affect patient perception, trigeminal neuritis, trigeminal neuralgia, and tongue Pharyngeal neuralgia, migraine and period of toothache attack.

5. history of drug allergies, such as NSAID drugs, tobramycin, anesthetics and so on. Smokers and alcoholics (smoking volume >15 cigarettes/day, pure alcohol consumption>100 ml/week).

6. Other history of eye surgery, such as history of eye trauma, history of glaucoma surgery, history of cataract surgery, history of retinal surgery, or other serious injuries to the eyelids, conjunctiva, cornea, and other tissues of the eye surface.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
0.1% bromfenac
the patients received the use of the Ponacore 3 days before and 7 days after the operation. Local eye drops, 2 times a day.

Locations

Country Name City State
China Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong
China Zhongshan Opthalmic Center Guangzhou Guangdong

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (6)

Donnenfeld ED, Holland EJ, Stewart RH, Gow JA, Grillone LR; Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% (Xibrom) Study Group. Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% (Xibrom) for postoperative ocular pain and inflammation. Ophthalmology. 2007 Sep;114(9):1653-62. Epub 2007 Apr 19. — View Citation

Henderson BA, Gayton JL, Chandler SP, Gow JA, Klier SM, McNamara TR; Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution (Bromday) Once Daily Study Group. Safety and efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution (Bromday) dosed once daily for postoperative ocular inflammation and pain. Ophthalmology. 2011 Nov;118(11):2120-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.035. Epub 2011 Jul 16. — View Citation

Hoy SM. Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07%: A Review of Its Use After Cataract Surgery. Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Aug;35(8):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s40261-015-0309-3. Review. — View Citation

Rajpal RK, Ross B, Rajpal SD, Hoang K. Bromfenac ophthalmic solution for the treatment of postoperative ocular pain and inflammation: safety, efficacy, and patient adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jun 25;8:925-31. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S46667. eCollection 2014. Review. — View Citation

Silverstein SM, Cable MG, Sadri E, Peace JH, Fong R, Chandler SP, Gow JA, Klier SM, McNamara TR; Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution Once Daily (Bromday) Study Group. Once daily dosing of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% for postoperative ocular inflammation and pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Sep;27(9):1693-703. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.597663. Epub 2011 Jul 14. — View Citation

Walters TR, Goldberg DF, Peace JH, Gow JA; Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07% Once Daily Study Group. Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily for cataract surgery: results of 2 randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Sep 8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary visual analog scale(VAS) The VAS pain score provides an intensity score of the pain experienced. The VAS allows the patient to self-rate his or her pain on a 0 to 10 horizontal grading scale of subjective pain assessment with 0 as "no pain at all" and 10 being "the most severe intolerable pain I have ever experienced." Change from Baseline VAS at 10 days
Primary present pain intensity index(PPI) The PPI scale is a measure of the magnitude of pain experienced by an individual and is a six-point verbal rating scale that indicates overall pain intensity and includes six levels (0, none; 1, mild; 2, discomforting; 3, distressing; 4, horrible; and 5, excruciating). Higher numbers indicate more severe pain. Change from Baseline PPI at 10 days
Secondary corneal epithelium healing(CEH) Took the anterior segment photography and slit lamp examination parallel sodium fluorescein staining. The corneal epithelial defect area was stained with fluorescein sodium. Corneal epithelial healing rate is obtained by calculating the difference of the corneal epithelial defect area on day1 from day10, then divided by days. Change from Baseline corneal epithelial defect at 10 days
Secondary Inflammation Evaluation by temporal conjunctival hyperaemia index (TCHI) Ocular inflammation was assessed with an automated bulbar redness grading technique, the Oculus Keratograph?R5M (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) by temporal conjunctival hyperaemia index (TCHI). The Oculus Keratograph 5M returns redness using a clinical grading scale of 0.0-4.0 in 0.1 steps.we choose TCHI to evaluate the degree of ocular inflammation, which the grade of 1.2 or less is considered a physiologic degree of bulbar redness. Change from Baseline TCHI at 10 days
Secondary Symptoms Evaluation by ocular symptom scores(OSS) The irritative symptoms evaluation by ocular symptom scores(OSS),which was carried out by an independent investigator at each visit with questionnaires of ocular symptom scores(OSS), which included grading of their symptoms (pain, foreign body sensation, burning sensation, visual fatigue and dryness) using a 4-point scale. The patients determine the quality of irritative symptom by selecting one of the options: None = 0, Perceptible or intermittent fatigue=1, Obvious visual fatigue but tolerable=2, Apparent visual fatigue and hard to bear=3. Higher numbers indicate more severe irritative symptom. Change from Baseline OSS at 10 days
Secondary psychological state changes of depression was evaluated with Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) In the main component of the SDS , patients are asked 20 questions about Mental and physical feelings of emotional experience, and the patients determine the quality of emotion by selecting one of the options: Occasionally=1, sometimes=2, often=3, and continuously=4. 10 questions are scored forward, the other 10 questions are scored backward. The total score is multiplied by an integer of 1.25 to get the standard score. According to Chinese norms, the cut-off value of SDS standard score is 53, 53-62 is mild, 63-72 is moderate, over 72 is severe, and lower than 53 belongs to the normal. Change from Baseline SDS at 10 days
Secondary psychological state changes of anxiety was evaluated with Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) In the main component of the SAS , patients are asked 20 questions about Mental and physical feelings of emotional experience, and the patients determine the quality of emotion by selecting one of the options: Occasionally=1, sometimes=2, often=3, and continuously=4. 10 questions are scored forward, the other 10 questions are scored backward. The total score is multiplied by an integer of 1.25 to get the standard score. According to Chinese norms, the cut-off value of SAS standard score is 53, 53-62 is mild, 63-72 is moderate, over 72 is severe, and lower than 53 belongs to the normal. Change from Baseline SAS at 10 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care