Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05079087 |
Other study ID # |
01 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
November 1, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2021 |
Source |
Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige |
Contact |
Paolo Seraglio, MD |
Phone |
00390473267570 |
Email |
paolomarioenrico.seraglio[@]sabes.it |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The aims of this study are:
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the pericapsulare blockade of the femoral nerve, the
accessory obturator nerve and the obturator nerve in patients with pertrochanteric
fractures of the femur, during the pre-operative period for patient positioning
manoeuvres (sitting position for performing spinal anaesthesia, mobilisation on the
operating bed, etc.);
- Evaluate the consumption of opioids or hypnotics in the perioperative period, which are
more responsible for the incidence of delirium in the elderly patient;
- Evaluate the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia and well-being.
Description:
Pertrochanteric femoral fracture is a frequent orthopaedic emergency in the elderly and is
associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical reduction and subsequent
fixation is the definitive therapy for most patients. Recent clinical studies show that early
treatment within the first 48 hours significantly reduced mortality and major complication
(pulmonary embolism, sepsis, cardiac events, renal and respiratory failure). Even though,
data regarding the anaesthesiology method best suited for this intervention are somewhat
controversialthe Italian Society for Anaesthesiology, Analgesia Reanimation and intensive
care recommends spinal anaesthesia as the standard procedure. In addition, the Association of
Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland recommend this approach.
Patient mobilisation for the administration of spinal anaesthesia as well as post-operative
care require effective perioperative pain management. In current practice, this is achieved
by the administration of systemic analgosedative treatment. Ideally, the use of opioids or
ketamine should be minimized since their side effects are major morbidity factors. Peripheral
nerve blocked can be an efficient to foster pre- and postoperative analgesia and therefore
minimize the need for opioids.
Currently, the psoas compartment block is considered to be the most reliable peripheral nerve
block for analgesia in pertrochanteric femoral fractures, although it is technically rather
difficult to perform and could be associated with serious side effects. Alternative
approaches, such as the femoral nerve block, the Iata band block or the 3-in-1 block often do
not possess a sufficient reliable analgesic effect in this kind of injury. Thus so far,
peripheral nerve blocks are not routinely applied in clinical practice in most cases.
The anterior capsule of the hip joint is the most innervated area of the entire joint.
The nerves involved are:
- The obturatorial nerve
- The accessory nerve of the obturator
- The femoral nerve Adequate anaesthesia for pertrochanteric femoral facture requires the
blockage of all three nerves. In 2018, Gíron-Arango et al., developed a novel ultrasound
guided approach for the blockade these nerves, the Pericapsular nerve group (PENG)
block. The investigators consider this peripheral nerve block a potentially beneficial
technique to implement in the treatment of per trochanteric femur fracture patients.
Patients with a pertochanteric femoral fracture admitted to the orthopaedics department for
surgical treatment will be asked whether they are willing to participate to the study. After
transfer of the patient to Anaesthesiology, before performing any additional analgesic
measures, the NRS at rest and on the movement of the affected limb (extension of 20°) will be
evaluated. The 4AT test for the assessment of delirium will be performed to obtain a baseline
value. The participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. Due to the fact that these
patients need swift treatment for their injury, our randomisation is based on alternating
assignments to the two groups based on the time patients sign their informed consent for
study participation. The investigators have no indication that this randomisation procedure
could lead to a bias. The first group will consist of patients that undergo PENG block
administering a mixture of Ropivacaine 0.5% + Dexamethasone 4 mg in a volume of 20 ml before
performing the spinal anaesthesia. There is one report indicating that a 1:1 mixture of
ropivacaine 0.75% with 4mg/mL dexamethasone could pose a risk due to crystal formation.
However, in our clinical practice, where the investigators mix 0.5% in a 1:20 ratio, thus
producing an injection containing 30-times less dexamethasone, the investigators did never
experience problems with crystallisation. This is extensively backed by literature. In any
case, the patients will be informed about the off-label nature of perineural dexamethasone
during the anaesthesiologic visit.
The PENG-block will be administered under ultrasound (US) guidance with a low frequency
curvilinear probe. The probe will be placed parallel to the inguinal crease at the level of
the anterior superior iliac spine. Scanning will be done with gradual caudal movement of the
probe. After the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) is visible, the probe will be turned
slightly medial until the hyperechoic continuous shadow of the superior pubic ramus is
visible. The Psoas muscle with its prominent tendon will be identified just above the pubic
ramus. The target is the plane between the 2 structures. While aligning the pubic ramus in
the center of the image and targeting the pubic ramus just medial to the AIIS, a 22 Go 10 cm
needle will be introduced and 20 ml of anesthetic solution administered. The participants are
informed about the specifics of the PENG blocks and the risks (which are minor) during the
anesthesiologic visit.
Patients in the second group will undergo sedation and analgesic treatment with Ketamine and
Midazolam titrated to the best Verbal Rating Score without respiratory and cardiovascular
depressant effect. 30 minutes after the PENG block or the drug treatment, immediately before
mobilization for the spinal anaesthesia, the assessment of NRS at rest and on movement of the
affected limb (extension of 20°) will be repeated.
Spinal anaesthesia will be performed using 2.5mL isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% applying state of
the art care.
After surgical intervention in postoperative care, patients do not receive fix systemic
analgesia as post-operative pain should be covered by the PENG block. However, in the
post-operative are they will receive Paracetamol, Metamizole and Buprenorphine if necessary.
Once they are transferred to the orthopaedics department, patients analgesia will be managed
according to the orthopaedics department standardized protocols. In any case, post-operative
opiate consumption will be recorded. To assess post-operative pain management performance in
the two groups, the NRS at rest and on movement of the affected limb (extension of 20°) will
be evaluated 18 hours after the PENG block. In order to avoid too much discomfort for the
patients and to not induce unnecessary inflammation in the surgical area, the investigators
refrain of doing too many measurements. The investigators expect that the the 18 hours
measurement together with the evaluation of post-operative opiate use will give us a clear
image of post-operative pain control. Also, 18 hours after, the 4AT test will be performed to
quantify symptoms of delirium. Furthermore, the occurrence of PONV and patient satisfaction
on a VAS-Scale will be evaluated.
The primary endpoint is the NRS variations during movement of the affected limp (extension of
20°) before and 30 minutes as well as 18 hours after performing the PENG block or
analgosedation. Secondary endpoints are occurrence of delirium quantified by the 4AT test, if
and who much and which rescue opiate was used, occurrence of PONV and patient satisfaction
expressed on a VAS-Scale.