Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05888142
Other study ID # STUDY00015202
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 16, 2022
Est. completion date August 29, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source University of Washington
Contact Miles Fontenot, MD, Ph.D
Phone 631-503-1624
Email mfon@uw.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is designed to test if the use of virtual reality (VR) can improve chronic pain related to CRPS. One way is to use virtual reality. Virtual reality involves looking into a set of goggles and interacting with a computer-simulated world. The use of VR has been shown to be an effective treatment for other pain conditions (Hoffman et al., 2019) and is inexpensive and noninvasive.


Description:

Participants will "go into" simple fun pain distracting virtual reality worlds (no previous video game experience needed). They will also learn some simple 10 minute stress reduction, mood lifting mindfulness skills in VR and will receive audio instructions to focus their attention on the sights and sounds, and controlled breathing (Flores et al., 2019).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 12
Est. completion date August 29, 2024
Est. primary completion date August 29, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 85 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria - adults (18+) - confirmed diagnosis of either CRPS I or CRPS II of one or both upper limbs (as defined by the Budapest Criteria) - average pain score in the affected CRPS limb(s) greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 - on a stable treatment plan for 4 weeks prior to the VR intervention phase - ability to wear a VR head-mounted display - ability to speak and read English - ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - personal history of severe motion sickness - severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life (ASA class IV+) - prisoners.

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
in clinic pain VR reduction exercises
During the first two weeks of treatment, participants will use commercially available VR during "in clinic" VR physical therapy exercises, to help reduce their pain and improve functionality.
In clinic VRpain reduction exercises + VR homeworks
During the first two weeks of treatment, participants will use commercially available VR during "in clinic" physical therapy exercises, and during homeworks to help reduce their pain and improve functionality.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Washington (only CRPS patients are eligible) Seattle Washington

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Washington Mayday Fund

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060. — View Citation

Ferguson L, Scheman J, Patient global impression of change scores within the context of a chronic pain rehabilitation program, The Journal of Pain, Volume 10, 2009, S73. ISSN 1526-5900, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.01.258.

Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005. — View Citation

Flores A, Linehan MM, Todd SR, Hoffman HG. The Use of Virtual Reality to Facilitate Mindfulness Skills Training in Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Study. Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 23;9:531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00531. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

Hoffman HG, Patterson DR, Rodriguez RA, Pena R, Beck W, Meyer WJ. Virtual Reality Analgesia for Children With Large Severe Burn Wounds During Burn Wound Debridement. Front Virtual Real. 2020 Dec;1:602299. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.602299. Epub 2020 Dec 10. — View Citation

Neblett R, Cohen H, Choi Y, Hartzell MM, Williams M, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): establishing clinically significant values for identifying central sensitivity syndromes in an outpatient chronic pain sample. J Pain. 2013 May;14(5):438-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.012. Epub 2013 Mar 13. — View Citation

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurements, 1, 385-401.

Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. C., and Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess. 7: 524-532.

Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PH. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1995 Dec;5(4):235-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02109988. — View Citation

Yu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Pilkonis PA. Development of short forms from the PROMIS sleep disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011 Dec 28;10(1):6-24. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2012.636266. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), regarding CRPS pain. This self-report measure. reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Compared with before receiving VR therapy, how would you describe your pain related to CRPS now overall? 7 point scale from - 3 to + 3 (-3 = very much worst, +3 = very much better). This is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change in CRPS pain as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Primary The Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), regarding CRPS pain. This self-report measure. reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Compared with before receiving VR therapy, how would you describe your pain related to CRPS now overall? 7 point scale from - 3 to + 3 (-3 = very much worst, +3 = very much better). This is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change in CRPS pain as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Primary The Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), regarding CRPS pain. This self-report measure. reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Compared with before receiving VR therapy, how would you describe your pain related to CRPS now overall? 7 point scale from - 3 to + 3 (-3 = very much worst, +3 = very much better). This is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change in CRPS pain as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Change from baseline to 14 weeks
Primary The Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), regarding functionality/physical abilities The self-report measure reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Compared with before receiving VR therapy, how would you describe your physical abilities now overall? 7 point scale from - 3 to + 3 (-3 = very much worst, +3 = very much better). This is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change in physical abilities as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Primary The Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), regarding functionality/physical abilities. This self-report measure reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Compared with before receiving VR therapy, how would you describe your physical abilities now overall? 7 point scale from - 3 to + 3 (-3 = very much worst, +3 = very much better). This is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change in physical abilities as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Primary The Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), regarding functionality/physical abilities. This self-report measure reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Compared with before receiving VR therapy, how would you describe your physical abilities now overall? 7 point scale from - 3 to + 3 (-3 = very much worst, +3 = very much better). This is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change in physical abilities as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Change from baseline to 14 weeks
Secondary The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a self-report screening instrument designed to measure exaggerated pain sensitivity. 25 questions, patients answer "never, rarely sometimes, often, always". Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Secondary The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a self-report screening instrument designed to measure exaggerated pain sensitivity. 25 questions, patients answer "never, rarely sometimes, often, always". Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a self-report screening instrument designed to measure exaggerated pain sensitivity. 25 questions, patients answer "never, rarely sometimes, often, always". Change from baseline to 14 weeks
Secondary CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), NIMH. 20 self-rating questions about how depressed the patient has felt during the past week: rarely, a little of the time, a moderate amount of time, most or all of the time. Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Secondary CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), NIMH. 20 self-rating questions about how depressed the patient has felt during the past week: rarely, a little of the time, a moderate amount of time, most or all of the time. Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), NIMH. 20 self-rating questions about how depressed the patient has felt during the past week: rarely, a little of the time, a moderate amount of time, most or all of the time. Change from baseline to 14 weeks
Secondary Mindfulness. Mindfulness. Using a single item graphic rating scale, Patients are asked "how mindful were you during the past week? (on a zero to 10 scale where 0 is not mindful at all, and 10 = completely present in the moment, 100% of the time). Change from baseline to 2 weeks.
Secondary Mindfulness. Mindfulness. Using a single item graphic rating scale, Patients are asked "how mindful were you during the past week? (on a zero to 10 scale where 0 is not mindful at all, and 10 = completely present in the moment, 100% of the time). Change from baseline to 6 weeks.
Secondary Mindfulness. Mindfulness. Using a single item graphic rating scale, Patients are asked "how mindful were you during the past week? (on a zero to 10 scale where 0 is not mindful at all, and 10 = completely present in the moment, 100% of the time). Change from baseline to 14 weeks.
Secondary Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Patients answer 13 questions about thoughts and feelings they have when they are in pain. Not at all, to a slight degree, to a moderate degree, to a great degree, all the time. Change from baseline to 2 weeks.
Secondary Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Patients answer 13 questions about thoughts and feelings they have when they are in pain. Not at all, to a slight degree, to a moderate degree, to a great degree, all the time. Change from baseline to 6 weeks.
Secondary Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Patients answer 13 questions about thoughts and feelings they have when they are in pain. Not at all, to a slight degree, to a moderate degree, to a great degree, all the time. Change from baseline to 14 weeks.
Secondary The 8-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form. The 8-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form assesses the sleep quality in the past 7 days, in individuals age 18 and older. Patients rate each question as Very poor, poor, fair, good, very good. Change from baseline to 2 weeks.
Secondary The 8-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form. The 8-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form assesses the sleep quality in the past 7 days, in individuals age 18 and older. Patients rate each question as Very poor, poor, fair, good, very good. Change from baseline to 6 weeks.
Secondary The 8-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form. The 8-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form assesses the sleep quality in the past 7 days, in individuals age 18 and older. Patients rate each question as Very poor, poor, fair, good, very good. Change from baseline to 14 weeks.
Secondary Quickdash (measure of physical function). Patients rate their ability to do a number of activities, 11 questions. QuickDASH uses 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Secondary Quickdash (measure of physical function). Patients rate their ability to do a number of activities, 11 questions. QuickDASH uses 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary Quickdash (measure of physical function). Patients rate their ability to do a number of activities, 11 questions. QuickDASH uses 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Change from baseline to 14 weeks
Secondary Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Patients answer 17 questions about their fear of movement by responding "strongly disagree, disagree, agree, or strongly agree". Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Secondary Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Patients answer 17 questions about their fear of movement by responding "strongly disagree, disagree, agree, or strongly agree". Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Patients answer 17 questions about their fear of movement by responding "strongly disagree, disagree, agree, or strongly agree". Change from baseline to 14 weeks.
Secondary Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short form, Pain interference scale. The BPI pain interference scale is a self-administered questionnaire which includes 7 items where the patient is asked to rate their perceived impact of pain on various functional activities. The final score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=pain does not interfere; 10=pain completely interferes). Change from baseline to 2 weeks
Secondary Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short form, Pain interference scale. The BPI pain interference scale is a self-administered questionnaire which includes 7 items where the patient is asked to rate their perceived impact of pain on various functional activities. The final score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=pain does not interfere; 10=pain completely interferes). Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short form, Pain interference scale. The BPI pain interference scale is a self-administered questionnaire which includes 7 items where the patient is asked to rate their perceived impact of pain on various functional activities. The final score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=pain does not interfere; 10=pain completely interferes). Change from baseline to 14 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05452499 - Pain Neuroscience Education and Therapeutic Exercise as a Treatment for Breast Cancer Survivors Living With Sequelae N/A
Recruiting NCT05037682 - Pain and Opioid Management in Older Adults N/A
Completed NCT04080037 - Assessing Opioid Care Practices Using CPV Patient Simulation Modules N/A
Recruiting NCT05382962 - iCanCope With Post-Operative Pain (iCanCope PostOp) N/A
Recruiting NCT04285112 - SPRINT: Signature for Pain Recovery IN Teens
Active, not recruiting NCT04850079 - EHR Precision Drug Treatment in Neonates
Completed NCT03272139 - Interscalene Block Versus Superior Trunk Block Phase 4
Completed NCT03271151 - Effect of Duloxetine on Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT03886142 - Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Radio Frequency for Chronic Knee Arthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT05761392 - APP-based Precise Management System of Chronic Intractable Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05877157 - Pain AND Opioids After Surgery
Completed NCT03947749 - Linking Epigenomics With Prescription Opioid Abuse and High Impact Musculoskeletal Pain
Completed NCT03280017 - Ketamine With Multilevel Paravertebral Block for Post Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Pain Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04874038 - Prevention of Persistent Pain With LidocAine iNfusions in Breast Cancer Surgery (PLAN) Phase 3
Completed NCT04280796 - Changes in Affective Pain Processing in Human Volunteers N/A
Withdrawn NCT05125978 - Efficacy and Safety of Canadá Association in the Treatment of Chronic Pain Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT04328805 - Pain Reduction and Changes in Upper Limb Function Produced by an Ibuprofen Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Phase 4
Completed NCT04976738 - A Study of Cybis™ 10:25 THC:CBD Oil in Adults With Chronic Back/Neck Pain Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT04089618 - Meditation Based Lifestyle Modification in Chronic Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05699837 - Alpha Entrainment for Pain and Sleep (Extension) N/A