View clinical trials related to Pacemaker.
Filter by:The investigators assessed whether short-term cardiac rehabilitation following pacemaker implantation was enough to improve both physical function and quality of life.
The implantation of cardiac electronic devices is a common procedure in the Electrophysiology Laboratory. The most commonly used venous access sites are the cephalic, the axillary and the subclavian vein. Studies comparing these options have been conducted in the past. Axillary venous access can be achieved either through axillary vein angiography or by ultrasound guidance. Nevertheless, appropriate training is required for the ultrasound-guided axillary puncture technique-as well as for the cephalic vein cutdown technique. Data from randomized trials regarding direct comparison of the two methods in terms of efficacy and safety are very limited. The purpose of the study is the comparison of the efficacy and safety of the ultrasound-guided axillary venous access technique versus the cephalic venous access using the cut-down technique in patients requiring intravenous cardiac device (single-chamber/dual-chamber pacemaker/defibrillator) implantation.
At present, cardiac pacing has been widely used in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias and heart failure, which can effectively improve the survival rate of patients. With the rapid development of technology, different sites can be chosen to pace, such as right atrial appendage, the atrial septum and the right atrial wall in the atrium, His bundle, left bundle branch area, right ventricular apex, outflow tract, and left ventricular pacing via coronary vein in the ventricle. There are few studies comparing the long-term efficacy and safety of different pacing sites in daily practice. This study aims to observe the efficacy and safety of cardiac pacing at different sites in short and long term, and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of pacing at different sites.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. While peri-procedural complications such as stroke, vascular complications and bleeding have substantially declined with the refinement of transcatheter valves and increasing experience, new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) or atrioventricular conduction disturbances continue to occur in almost half of all patients. Colchicine is a well-known substance that has been approved for the treatment of acute gout flares and familial Mediterranean fever in many countries. Colchicine has proven safe and effective in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine may mitigate the occurrence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances and thus the need for the implantation of a permanent pacemaker post transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of the Co-STAR-Trial is to investigate the efficacy of colchicine for the prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation and conduction disturbances requiring the implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Co-STAR is an investigator-initiated, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 200 patients referred for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and selected to undergo TAVI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment with Colchicine or placebo for 30 days post transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Recent exploratory studies suggest that pacemaker patients with diastolic dysfunction (DD) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may benefit from a higher backup heart rate (HR) setting than the factory setting of 60 beats per minute (bpm). In this prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study, pacemaker patients with DD or overt HFpEF and either 1) intrinsic ventricular conduction or 2) conduction system or biventricular pacing will be enrolled and randomized to either a personalized lower HR setting (myPACE group, based on a height-based HR algorithm) or to the standard 60bpm backup setting (control group) for 1 year.
Venous access is a fundamental step in lead insertion for endovenous cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Cephalic vein cutdown is the most widely used technique in Europe. Ultrasound-guided axillary vein access is a promising alternative but there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting this technique. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided axillary vein access versus cephalic venous cutdown for implantation of endovenous CIED. Half of patients is implanted using an ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture. The other half is implanted using a cephalic vein cutdown. After venous access is achieved, implantation procedure is identical in the two arms.
The investigators have demonstrated that they can reliably identify an optimum heart rate range for contractility of the left ventricle in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). They have also demonstrated in an acute cross-over and a small parallel group feasibility study that keeping the heart rate in this range (versus standard rate-response programming) in patients with CHF is associated with increased exercise time on a treadmill (around 60s or 10%). They now want to explore in a randomised, placebo-controlled 3-arm parallel group trial whether optimal programming versus standard rate-response programming versus no rate-response programming for 6 months leads to appreciable improvements in exercise time and quality of life, while having no adverse effects on left ventricular function and battery longevity and what the mechanisms of this might be. 400 patients with CHF and a pacemaker will undergo the non-invasive echocardiographic assessment to establish the force frequency relationship and the optimal heart rate for contractility. They will then perform a treadmill walk test, complete quality of life questionnaires and be offered the opportunity to participate in a series of mechanistic substudies. They will then be randomised to optimal rate-response settings, standard rate response settings or no rate-response settings and followed up at 6 months at which point the tests will be repeated.
This is a retrospective study of our patient population implanted with the Medtronic's Leadless single-chamber ventricular pacemakers.
This is a prospective, single-site, non-randomized, acute feasibility clinical study. The purpose of this study is to explore the electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics of simultaneous stimulation of right and left bundle branches area.
Investigators will identify a group of patients with complete heart block and a dual chamber pacemaker who will be expected to be able to exercise on a treadmill. Investigators will utilize symptom logs, cuff and continuous blood pressure monitoring. It is planned to study the symptomatic impact of loss of AV synchrony at significant levels of exercise.