View clinical trials related to Ovarian Cancer.
Filter by:prospective study was conducted and performed on 100 women with pelvic pain due to accidently discovered adnexal mass
This is an open-label, Phase 1/2 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of APL-5125 for the treatment of selected locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with particular focus on Colorectal carcinoma (CRC).
The goal of this type of clinical trial study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of metabolic remodeling nature killer cells as neoadjuvant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer
This is a two-part, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation and dose expansion study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PDx), and anti- tumor activity of ETX-19477, a novel reversible small molecule inhibitor of PARG.
This study is a randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR-A1921 versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
To prospectively assess the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis for women with isolated STIC (serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma). Moreover, to identify histopathological characteristics of STIC which are reproducible and associated to the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis and to report the findings of additional diagnostics.
GynRAN is an international, multicentre, transversal, diagnostic and non-interventional study carried out in gynecology-obstetrics/gynecological oncology departments that aims to identify a diagnostic signature for gynecological pathologies by analyzing of coding and non-coding RNA contained in patients saliva. The study population consists of patients with clinically symptomatic females with one or more of the gynecological pathologies (endometriosis, adenomyosis, ovarian cysts, fibroids, ovarian/cervical/uterine cancer) and asymptomatic females. The patients concerned by the study will be managed without modification of the care pathway, nor modification of the therapeutic indications, nor modification of the diagnostic or follow-up examinations necessary according to the context, which are carried out according to the local recommendations.
The main aim of this study are to check for side effects from TAK-853, check how much TAK-853 participants can receive without getting side effects from it, check how well TAK-853 controls symptoms, and to check how much TAK-853 stays in their blood over time. The study will be conducted in two phases including Phase 1 Part and Phase 2 Part. In Phase 1 Part, the participants will stay in the hospital for 3 days at least after their 1st injection for some tests and to check for any side effects from their treatment. In Phase 2 Part, participants will visit their study hospital for multiple times. In both phases, the participants will receive TAK-853 on the first days of each 3-week cycle. The participant will be in the study for about 9 months in Phase 1 Part and for about 24 months in Phase 2 Part. The study doctors will check for side effects from the study treatments.
The study should evaluate the biological distribution of [123I]I-DARPIN-Ec1 in patients with lung and ovarian cancer The primary objective are: 1. To assess the distribution of [123I]I-DARPIN-Ec1 in normal tissues and tumors at different time intervals. 2. To evaluate dosimetry of [123I]I-DARPIN-Ec1. 3. To study the safety and tolerability of the drug [123I]I-DARPIN-Ec1 after a single injection in a diagnostic dosage. The secondary objective are: 1. To compare the obtained [123I]I-DARPIN-Ec1 SPECT imaging results with the data of CT and/or MRI and/or ultrasound examination and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies in lung and ovarian cancer patients.
The study aims to investigate the prognostic and postoperative complication relevance of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). The main question it aims to answer is: Does systematic lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery have a significant impact on survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy? The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complication were compared between the lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy groups to answer the question.