View clinical trials related to Outcome, Fatal.
Filter by:The recent pandemic of the COVID-19 disease has caused a national health emergency due to its severity and the clinical and social consequences of the disease. Crude mortality in Spain is 9.2%. However, the causes of death of critically ill patients with COVID-19 are unknown. To date, no treatment has been shown to be effective for the 2019-SARS-CoV-2 infection is recommended. Supportive care and isolation are recommended for infected individuals. Currently, observational studies on critically ill patients with COVID-19 have small samples. The objective is to evaluate the incidence of mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 disease in this group of critically ill patients, as well as the risk factors associated with mortality and the effectiveness of the treatments used compassionately.
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China has been declared a public health emergency of international concern. Despite lower mortality rate, SARS-CoV-2 has killed more people than SARS and MERS and the number keeps growing. Epidemic studies have been well described clinical features of patients with COVID-19, with the disease severity being an independent predictor of poor outcome. However, there is still no research investigating the prognostic factors of patients with COVID-19.
A randomised controlled trial study consisting of two-group pretest-post-test.
The aim of this study is to assess the use of ASPECTS and stroke biomarkers to predict the outcome and cognitive impairment in acute ischemic stroke.
This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent PFR for either bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement
This study is retrospective study. The purpose of this study is checking the effect of sugammadex on the outcome after colorectal surgery. The outcome is compared among the 2 groups, sugammadex group and non-sugammadex group. The primary parameters of outcome are length of stay, readmission rate, postoperative complications, time interval for first successful oral intake.
Presentation of myocarditis is heterogeneous, often ranges from being asymptomatic, to chest pain, dyspnoea, palpitations, and even sudden cardiac death. Diagnosing myocarditis is challenging with no current uniform clinical gold-standard. CMR is a key investigative tool, however the predictive value of CMR features is unknown. In this study we assess 670 consecutive patients with suspected myocarditis who were referred for CMR between 2002 and 2015 at the BWH. CMR features such as late gadolinium sizing, T1 mapping, extracellular volume fraction assessment, strain analysis (feature tracking), clinical data, labortory tetsings and electrocardiogramm are linked to the outcome in order to assess its predictive value.
Continuous video-EEG monitoring (cEEG) significantly improves seizure or status epilepticus detection in patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and is recommended for patients with consciousness impairment. cEEG is time- and resource consuming as compared to routine EEG (rEEG, lasting 20-30 minutes). While centers in North America have been using it increasingly, most European hospitals still do not have resources to comply with these guidelines. In addition, only one population-based study based on discharge diagnoses suggested that cEEG may improve patients' outcome. Current guidelines are thus based upon weak evidence and expert opinions. Aim of the study is to assess if cEEG in adults with consciousness impairment is related to an improvement of functional outcome, and to address the prognostic role of quantitative network EEG analyses. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, adults with GCS inferior or equal to 11 or FOUR score inferior or equal to 12 will be randomized 1:1 to cEEG for 30-48 hours or two rEEG within 48 hours. The primary outcome will be mortality at 6 months. Secondary outcomes will blindly assess functional outcome, seizure/status epilepticus detection rate, duration of ICU stay, change in patient management (antiepileptic drug introduced, increased, or stopped, brain imaging), and reimbursement. Additionally, quantitative EEG will be assessed towards the primary outcome. 350 patients are planned to be included.
The Resuscitation Outcomes in the Netherlands - study assesses one-year survival and quality of life after In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest(IHCA). It's design is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study which will include all patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for IHCA in 2017. Current literature describes poor survival after IHCA and no risk stratification tool for long-term outcome is available. Furthermore no such study has ever been performed in the Netherlands. The investigators aim to gain further insight in this major adverse event.
From November 2014 to October 2015, a multi-centers retrospective study was conducted to collect compliance, and 8 three-level hospitals from China were included. The infants survived to a postmenstrual age of 36 week with birth weight less than 1500g and without congenital disease. The birth weight, gestational age, morbidities and poor outcomes( death, cerebral palsy, cognitive, et al) were recorded. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test to observe the relationship between morbidities and poor outcomes. And the predictive effect on the number of the top three morbidities were analyzed by Logistic regression analysis.