Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06240078
Other study ID # COPD and sexual health
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 20, 2024
Est. completion date January 31, 2026

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source Vejle Hospital
Contact Louise M. Grønhaug, PhD-student
Phone +4521222506
Email louise.muxoll.gronhaug@rsyd.dk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Summary Person-centered care is a hot topic within healthcare, yet communication about patients' sexual health and intimacy issues remain too hot to handle within healthcare. Research indicates that sexual dysfunction and impaired sexual health are frequent among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite patients expecting healthcare professionals to address intimacy issues; these issues are often neglected, since the topic is a taboo. This study aims to address a gap in observational research by investigating the physical, psychological and social aspects of sexual health in both men and women with and without COPD. The primary hypothesis of this survey-based cross-sectional study is that COPD negatively impacts sexual health, leading to increased loneliness, relationship dissatisfaction, anxiety and/or depression, along with decreased health-related quality of life and well-being in patients. The study seeks to identify associations between impaired sexual health and these factors. By fostering a new understanding of these aspects, this study is essential to promote person-centered communication about sexual health, addressing the often overlooked needs and concerns of individuals with COPD. Ultimately, the study has the potential to improve sexual health and overall well-being among individuals with COPD, contributing to a more person-centered approach in COPD care.


Description:

Objectives The primary objectives of this study are to assess whether impaired sexual health is more prevalent in individuals with COPD compared to those without COPD and to explore its impact on well-being and health-related quality of life. Additionally, the study aims to comprehend the impact of COPD on sexual health by investigating potential associations among selected physical, psychological, and social factors related to sexual health. This understanding is crucial for guiding future studies on identified associations. The study will examine the following assumptions: 1. Impaired sexual health, characterized by a higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction, dissatisfaction, and distress, is more frequent in individuals with COPD than in a control group (individuals without COPD, matched by age, gender, and relationship status). 2. COPD has a comprehensive impact on both physical, psychological, and social aspects of sexual health. Impaired sexual health is associated with increased loneliness, relationship dissatisfaction, anxiety and/or depression, as well as decreased health-related quality of life and overall well-being. Method and materials This study adopts a cross-sectional design, utilizing a patient-reported questionnaire to collect data. The participant pool will encompass individuals aged 40 years or older, including those with COPD and a control group without COPD. The control group will be matched to the COPD sample based on age, gender, and relationship status, enhancing the precision of the exploration of COPD-specific challenges. All participants will be invited to complete a public online questionnaire, with all participants providing electronic informed consent before survey completion. To explore the impact of COPD on sexual health, including COPD-specific factors, and to assess the perceived effect on quality of life, the questionnaire incorporates various validated instruments. Each instrument will measure a specific aspects related to the physical, psychological, or social dimension of sexual health. Sexual dysfunction and sexual health will be assessed using The PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures (Brief Profile), while emotions and concerns related to sexuality will be identified through The Sexual Distress Scale. Relationship dissatisfaction will be assessed using The Couples Satisfaction Index, loneliness through the UCLA Loneliness Scale, and anxiety/depression via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Well-being will be evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L. Individuals with COPD will provide additional insights into the impact of COPD on health through the COPD Assessment Test. Based on a power calculation (two-sided; p<0.05; power=95%) (26), the study's exploratory approach, and the number of variables, a sample size of minimum 200 participants per group is deemed sufficient to identify associations. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, and frequencies, will be employed to report the prevalence of sexual health and summarize data related to COPD-specific challenges. Correlation coefficients will be calculated, and multiple regression analyses will be conducted to identify associations between variables, adjusting for potential confounders. STATA will be used for data analysis. The study results will be reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines (22).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 400
Est. completion date January 31, 2026
Est. primary completion date November 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 40 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Participant inclusion is based upon the reported information provided by the study participants: Inclusion Criteria: COPD Population - Mild to very servere COPD - =40 years old - Living in Denmark - Consent to participate the online survey Control Group: - Non-COPD - =40 years old - Living in Denmark - Consent to participate the online survey Exclusion Criteria: COPD Population: - Unwilling to participate and complete the online survey - Inability to participate and answer the survey questions in Danish due to cognitive impairment, servere illness, or reading or language barriers Control Group: - COPD - Spouse or partner with COPD - Unwilling to participate and complete the online survey - Inability to participate and answer the survey questions in Danish due to cognitive impairment, servere illness, or reading or language barriers

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Denmark Vejle Hospital, part of Lillebaelt Hospital Vejle Region Of Southern Denmark

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Vejle Hospital Region of Southern Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Sexual health acording to The PROMIS Sex FS BF (vers. 2.0) The PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures, version 2.0. Brief Profile (PROMIS SexFS BF v2.0) universally assesses Sexual Function and Satisfaction. A general screener item inquires about sexual activity in the past 30 days. Respondents who have been sexually active answer items covering various domain, e.g. Interest in Sexual Activity, Satisfaction with Sex Life, Orgasm Ability and Pleasure, Erectile Function, Vaginal Discomfort and Lubrication. Most items are gender-nonspecific.
Higher scores indicate greater Interest, Satisfaction, Orgasm ability, etc. Each domain's summed raw score is converted to T-scores, standardized to the U.S. general population (mean 50, SD 10). A clinically meaningful cutoff is five points below the population mean. (Weinfurt KP et al. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1961-1974.).
Day 1
Secondary Loneliness according to The UCLA Loneliness Scale Loneliness is assessed by the UCLA Loneliness Scale (revised), a 20 item scale rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 4 ('never' to 'always'). The scale covers the frequency of feelings/symptoms related to loneliness and social isolation, assessing three dimensions: emotional, social, and existential loneliness.
The total sum score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating more profound feelings of loneliness.
(Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (vers 3). Reliability, validity and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1996; 66: 20-40.) (Danish version: Lasgaard M. Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007; 42 (7): 1359-1366.)
Day 1
Secondary Well-being according to EQ-5D-5L Health related quality of life according to the EQ-5D-5L EuroQoL Five-Dimensional Five-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) to assess generic HRQL, by comprising two parts:
The first part entails five questions covering five domains of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) on a 5-item Likert-scale. Participants mark their status from 1 to 5 ('no problems' to 'unable to/extreme problems') for each dimension. Responses are combined to create a five-digit number describing health status (ranging from 11111 to 55555), which is converted to a UI using the EQ-5D-5L value set for Denmark.
The second part (VAS) assesses the currently experienced health on a vertical VASr between 0 and 100; the latter indicates the best health state imaginable.
(Jensen CE et al. The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):579-591.) (Danish version: Helbredsspørgeskema).
Day 1
Secondary Anxiety and depression according to HADS The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item scale consisting of two 7-item subscales assessing anxiety and depression symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety (0-21) and depression (0-21).
Additionally, a total score for the two components can be summed to provide a composite anxiety-depression score, with a maximum of 42 points. Higher scores indicate more severe symptomatology (Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x) (Danish version: Spørgeskema om angst og depression, til brug på hospital (HADS))
Day 1
Secondary Relationship satisfaction according to The Couples Satisfaction Index The Couples Satisfaction Index assess relationship satisfaction with 16 items (CSI-16). Comprising 5- and 6-point Likert scale items, respondents are prompted to evaluate their satisfaction across various relationship dimensions.
The total score, ranging from 0 to 81 (the sum of response point values), indicates the overall level of relationship satisfaction. Higher scores correspond to heightened relationship satisfaction, whereas scores below 51.5 suggest significant relationship dissatisfaction or distress (ibid.).
(Funk J L; Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007; 21, 572-583)
- Trillingsgaard T et al. Relationship Help-Seeking in a Danish Population Sample. J Marital Fam Ther. 2019;45(3):380-394. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12347 Danish version: "Mål for parforholdstilfredshed".
Day 1
Secondary Sexual distress according to The Sexual Distress Scale The Sexual Distress Scale - Revised (SDS-R) is utilized to assess sexual distress among both males and females. Sexual distress includes emotions and concerns related to sexuality. The scale comprises 13 items, each using a five-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 0 to 4 ('never' to 'always'). Participants rate the frequency of each feeling/symptom, with higher scores indicating higher sexual distress.
The total score ranges from 0 to 52, and a cut-off Total score of =11 indicates the presence of sexual distress.
(Santos-Iglesias P et al. A Systematic Review of Sexual Distress Measures. J Sex Med. 2018 May;15(5):625-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.020) (Sood R et al. Association of mindfulness with female sexual dysfunction. Maturitas. 2022 Jul;161:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.02.002.) (Danish version FSDS, 2001)
Day 1
Secondary COPD-impact on health according to CAT The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an 8-item disease-specific questionnaire that assess the impact of COPD on participants' health.
Each item provides six answer options, with scores ranging from 0 to 5. The total score spans from 0 to 40, with higher values indicating poorer health. A suggested cut-off is CAT <10, reflecting fewer symptoms, and CAT =10, indicating more symptoms.
(Kakavas S, Papanikolaou A, Kompogiorgas S, Stavrinoudakis E, Karayiannis D, Balis E. The Correlation of Sit-to-Stand Tests with COPD Assessment Test and GOLD Staging Classification. COPD. 2020 Dec;17(6):655-661. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1825661.)
Day 1
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05043428 - The Roles of Peers and Functional Tasks in Enhancing Exercise Training for Adults With COPD N/A
Completed NCT00528996 - An Efficacy and Safety Study to Compare Three Doses of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium and Placebo in the Respimat Inhaler. Phase 2
Completed NCT03740373 - A Study to Assess the Pulmonary Distribution of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Phase 1
Completed NCT05393245 - Safety of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients in Taiwan: a Non-interventional Study Based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Data
Completed NCT05402020 - Effectiveness of Tiotropium + Olodaterol Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) Among COPD Patients in Taiwan
Completed NCT04011735 - Re-usable Respimat® Soft MistTM Inhaler Study
Enrolling by invitation NCT03075709 - The Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan
Completed NCT03764163 - Image and Model Based Analysis of Lung Disease Early Phase 1
Completed NCT00515268 - Endotoxin Challenge Study For Healthy Men and Women Phase 1
Completed NCT04085302 - TARA Working Prototype Engagement Evaluation: Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT03691324 - Training of Inhalation Technique in Hospitalized Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients - a Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT02236611 - A 12-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium 62.5 Microgram (mcg) Compared With Glycopyrronium 44 mcg in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT00153075 - Flow Rate Effect Respimat Inhaler Versus a Metered Dose Inhaler Using Berodual in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT01017952 - A Study to Evaluate Annual Rate of Exacerbations and Safety of 3 Dosage Strengths of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT01009463 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT04882124 - Study of Effect of CSJ117 on Symptoms, Pharmacodynamics and Safety in Patients With COPD Phase 2
Completed NCT02853123 - Effect of Tiotropium + Olodaterol on Breathlessness in COPD Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT02619357 - Method Validation Study to Explore the Sensitivity of SenseWear Armband Gecko for Measuring Physical Activity in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) & Asthma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05858463 - High Intensity Interval Training and Muscle Adaptations During PR N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05032898 - Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inpatient Registry Study Stage II