Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
Impact of Weighted Blankets on Sleep Disturbance Among Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial
Many children with ADHD suffer from sleep disorders and dysfunction, which may affect development and well-being. According to the clinicians, some children find relief from restlessness and difficulty sleeping by using weighted blankets which have been proposed to reduce restlessness and stress via sensory integration and to calm the child by stimulating the sense of touch, muscles and joints. However, evidence for an effect on sleep is scarce, and only one RCT has investigated the effect of weighted blankets among children with ADHD. Using a RCT design, the aim is to investigate the effect on sleep disorders and dysfunction in children with ADHD aged 5-12 years by (1) using a weighted blanket during night and daytime in addition to usual treatment, compared to (2) usual treatment and a non-weighted sham blanket, with the primary outcome being differences in total sleep time. Results will support health- and social professionals who are involved in the treatment of children with ADHD.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 340 |
Est. completion date | August 1, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | April 15, 2026 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 5 Years to 12 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Signed informed consent. 2. Age 5-12 years (both included) at randomization. 3. Primary diagnosis of ADHD according to ICD-10 code F90.0, F90.1, F90.9 or F98.8. 4. Comorbidities are allowed. 5. Participated in a usual care sleep hygiene program managed by clinicians without effect within 6 months prior to enrollment. 6. If on ADHD medication or/and melatonin/sleep medication the dose must be stable, at least two weeks prior to enrollment. 7. The child and caregiver have adequate mastery of the Danish language. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Have used any type of medical device class 1 weighted blanket before. 2. Any diagnosed diseases that markedly compromises the participant's ability to adhere to the intervention (like mental retardation, severe underweight, chronic respiratory or circulatory conditions, surgical implants, osteoporosis). 3. Another member of the household enrolled in the trial. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Denmark | The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital | Frederiksberg |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg | Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark |
Denmark,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Changes in sensory modulation disorder (score point) | Changes from baseline to end of treatment in the caregiver-rated Sensory Processing Measure 2 (SPM-2). The 80 likert-type items include eight different scales: social participation, vision, hearing, touch, taste and smell, body awareness, balance and motion and finally planning and ideas, which capture related but separate aspects of sensory processing difficulties. Responses never, occasionally, frequently, or always correspond to the numeric values 1 to 4 respectively, to indicate the frequency of behaviors. A total raw score is calculated with a higher score suggesting greater dysfunction. Raw scores are also converted to T-scores and percentile scores that can fall into three ranges. T-scores in the range of 40 to 59 represent Typical functioning, T-scores in the range of 60 to 69 represent moderate difficulties in functioning, and T-scores of 70 or above represent severe difficulties in functioning. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Other | Cost effectiveness | Assessed by health economic aspects, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and productivity loss among caregivers. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Other | Changes in functional impairment | Functioning impairment will be measured using Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS-P). The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale assessment tool where caregivers rate the impact of their child's emotional or behavioural problems in the previous month on six separate domains: (A) Family (ten items); (B) School and learning; (C) Life skills; (D) Child's self-concept; (E) Social activities; and (F) Risky activities. Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 ('never or not at all') to 3 ('very often or very much') or rated as 'not applicable'. The instrument uses a likert scale such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The mean of all scored items for each domain will be calculated. Furthermore, a single overall WFIRS-P score will also be calculated as the average of the six domain scores. | 2 years after end of treatment. | |
Other | Changes in ADHD core symptoms (score point) | ADHD core symptoms will be measured with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) parent version. It is a 26-item questionnaire including the 18 original ADHD-RS-IV items supplied with 8 conduct problem items. All items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), where 0 represents never or rarely, 1 is sometimes, 2 is often, and 3 is very often. From the item scores, a total score ranging 0-78 will be calculated. Further, three sub-scores will be calculated; inattentive scale: range 0-27, hyperactive/impulsive scale: range 0-27, and conduct scale: range 0-24. | 2 years after end of treatment. | |
Other | Changes in parental stress (score point) | Parental stress is measured by the Parental Stress Scale (PSS). The PSS is an 18-item questionnaire assessing parents' feelings about their parenting role, exploring both positive aspects (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative aspects of parenthood (e.g. demands on resources, feelings of stress). Parents can agree or disagree in terms of their typical relationship with their child or children. Responses are scored as follows: strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree, strongly agree. To compute the parental stress score, items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, and 18 should be reversely scored as follows: (1=5) (2=4) (3=3) (4=2) (5=1). The item scores are then summed. Parental stress scores range from 18 to 90, with lower scores indicating lower levels of parental stress. | 2 years after end of treatment. | |
Other | Changes in child quality of life (score point) | Child quality of life will be measured using The World Health Organisation- Child Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The WHO-5 Child Wellbeing Index is a simple self-reported measure of children's psychological wellbeing. The tool consists of five statements describing a positive state. The child is asked to say how often they felt that way during the past two weeks, by selecting one of the following options: All the time, Often, Sometimes, Rarely or Never. | 2 years after end of treatment. | |
Other | Cost effectiveness | Assessed by health economic aspects, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and productivity loss among caregivers. | 2 years after end of treatment. | |
Primary | Changes in total sleep time (average minutes per day) | Total sleep time (TST) is defined as the time of total sleep episode minus the awake time (the entire time spent sleeping) and reported in minutes per day. TST per day will be measured using actigraphy in form of MotionWare 8 (The MotionWare 8®-CamNtech MotionWare). | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in functional impairment | Functioning impairment will be measured using Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS-P). The WFIRS-P is a 50-item scale assessment tool where caregivers rate the impact of their child's emotional or behavioural problems in the previous month on six separate domains: (A) Family (ten items); (B) School and learning; (C) Life skills; (D) Child's self-concept; (E) Social activities; and (F) Risky activities. Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 ('never or not at all') to 3 ('very often or very much') or rated as 'not applicable'. The instrument uses a likert scale such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The mean of all scored items for each domain will be calculated. Furthermore, a single overall WFIRS-P score will also be calculated as the average of the six domain scores. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in sleep onset latency (average minutes per day) | Sleep onset latency (SOL) refers to the period of time between turning lights out to go to sleep and falling asleep. SOL will be measured using actigraphy which includes a button that should be pressed by a caregiver when the lights are turned off. SOL will be reported as minutes per day. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in number of awakenings (numbers per night) | Wake after sleep is defined as number of minutes scored as wake during sleep period and will be measured using actigraphy. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in sleep efficiency (percentage) | Sleep efficiency (SE) is measured using actigraphy and is the actual sleep time expressed as a percentage of the total time in bed (the time elapsed between "lights out" and "get up time"). SE will be reported as minutes per day. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in ADHD core symptoms (score point) | ADHD core symptoms will be measured with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) parent version. It is a 26-item questionnaire including the 18 original ADHD-RS-IV items supplied with 8 conduct problem items. All items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), where 0 represents never or rarely, 1 is sometimes, 2 is often, and 3 is very often. From the item scores, a total score ranging 0-78 will be calculated. Further, three sub-scores will be calculated; inattentive scale: range 0-27, hyperactive/impulsive scale: range 0-27, and conduct scale: range 0-24. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in parental stress (score point) | Changes in parental stress is measured by the Parental Stress Scale (PSS). The PSS is an 18-item questionnaire assessing parents' feelings about their parenting role, exploring both positive aspects (e.g. emotional benefits, personal development) and negative aspects of parenthood (e.g. demands on resources, feelings of stress). Parents can agree or disagree in terms of their typical relationship with their child or children. Responses are scored as follows: strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree, strongly agree. To compute the parental stress score, items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, and 18 should be reversely scored as follows: (1=5) (2=4) (3=3) (4=2) (5=1). The item scores are then summed. Parental stress scores range from 18 to 90, with lower scores indicating lower levels of parental stress. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Changes in child quality of life (score point) | Child quality of life will be measured using The World Health Organisation- Child Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The WHO-5 Child Wellbeing Index is a simple self-reported measure of children's psychological wellbeing. The tool consists of five statements describing a positive state. The child is asked to say how often they felt that way during the past two weeks, by selecting one of the following options: All the time, Often, Sometimes, Rarely or Never. | Week 0 and 4 | |
Secondary | Adverse events (Number of participants with adverse events) | Number of participants with adverse events (AE). | During intervention | |
Secondary | Serious adverse events (Number of participants with serious adverse events) | Number of participants with serious adverse events (SAE). | During intervention |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06129396 -
Effects of Aerobic Exercise Intervention in Adolescents With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04779333 -
Lifestyle Enhancement for ADHD Program 2
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05935722 -
Evaluation of a Home-based Parenting Support Program: Parenting Young Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03148782 -
Brain Plasticity Underlying Acquisition of New Organizational Skills in Children-R61 Phase
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04832737 -
Strength-based Treatment Approach for Adults With ADHD
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04631042 -
Developing Brain, Impulsivity and Compulsivity
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05048043 -
Development of a Game-supported Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03337646 -
Evaluation of the Effect and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine in Children Aged 6-12 With ADHD and Autism
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06406309 -
Settling Down for Sleep in ADHD: The Impact of Sensory and Arousal Systems on Sleep in ADHD
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06454604 -
Virtual Reality Treatment for Emerging Adults With ADHD
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06080373 -
Formulation-based CBT for Adult Inmates With ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02477280 -
Effects of Expectation, Medication and Placebo on Objective and Self-rated Performance
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02911194 -
a2 Milk for Autism and Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02780102 -
Cognitive-Motor Rehabilitation, Stimulant Drugs, and Active Control in the Treatment of ADHD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02555150 -
A Comparison of PRC-063 and Lisdexamfetamine in the Driving Performance of Adults With ADHD
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02829970 -
Helping College Students With ADHD Lead Healthier Lifestyles
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02390791 -
New Technologies to Help Manage ADHD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02473185 -
Effects of Expectation, Medication and Placebo on Objective and Self-rated Performance During the QbTest
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04175028 -
Neuromodulation of Executive Function in the ADHD Brain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04296604 -
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Neuromodulation of Executive Function Across Neuropsychiatric Populations
|
N/A |