Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) Clinical Trial
— VAYHIAOfficial title:
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Ianalumab (VAY736) Versus Placebo in Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) Patients Who Failed at Least One Line of Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of ianalumab compared to placebo in patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, who failed at least one line of treatment.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | February 8, 2029 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2, 2026 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Key Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years and older at time of signing consent - Patients with primary or secondary wAIHA documented by positive direct antiglobulin test specific for anti-IgG or anti-IgA, who had an insufficient response to, or relapsed after at least one line of treatment, including patients with steroid resistance, dependence or intolerance - Hemoglobin concentration at screening and at Week 1 >=5 g/dL and <10 g/dL, associated with presence of symptoms related to anemia - The dose of supportive care must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization into the study Key Exclusion Criteria: - wAIHA secondary to hematologic disease involving bone marrow (e.g., CLL) or another immunologic disease requiring prohibited medication as per protocol. Patients with autoimmune diseases after wash-out from the treatments are allowed. - Presence of other forms of AIHA (cold or intermediate forms), Evans Syndrome or other cytopenias - Prior use of B-cell depleting therapy (e.g., rituximab) within 12 weeks prior to randomization, or without hematological response to the last course of B-cell depleting therapy - Neutrophils: <1000/mm3 - Serum creatinine >1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) - Immunoglobulin G (IgG) <5g/L - Active viral, bacterial or other infections (including tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2) requiring systemic treatment at time of screening, or history of recurrent clinically significant infection - Positivity for hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). HBcAb positive patients can be enrolled if HBsAg negative, HBV DNA negative, no pre-existing liver fibrosis is present and antiviral prophylaxis is given. - Known history of primary or secondary immunodeficiency, or a positive human immune deficiency virus (HIV) test result - Live or live-attenuated vaccination within 4 weeks before randomization - History of splenectomy Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion may apply. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Novartis Investigative Site | Buenos aires | |
Argentina | Novartis Investigative Site | Caba | Buenos Aires |
Argentina | Novartis Investigative Site | Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As | Buenos Aires |
Australia | Novartis Investigative Site | Canberra | Australian Capital Territory |
Australia | Novartis Investigative Site | Prahran | Victoria |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Dalian | |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Guangzhou | Guangdong |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Hangzhou | Zhejiang |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Kunming | Yunnan |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Suzhou | Jiangsu |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Tianjin | |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Tianjin | |
China | Novartis Investigative Site | Wuhan | Hubei |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Blois Cedex | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Caen | Cedex |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Creteil | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Le Mans | Cedex 09 |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Lille Cedex | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Nantes Cedex 1 | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Nice | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Toulouse | |
France | Novartis Investigative Site | Vandoeuvre Les Nancy | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Dresden | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Essen | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Frankfurt | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Giessen | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Greifswald | |
Germany | Novartis Investigative Site | Hannover | |
Hungary | Novartis Investigative Site | Debrecen | |
India | Novartis Investigative Site | Lucknow | Uttar Pradesh |
India | Novartis Investigative Site | Madurai | Tamil NADU |
India | Novartis Investigative Site | New Delhi | |
Israel | Novartis Investigative Site | Afula | |
Israel | Novartis Investigative Site | Kfar Saba | |
Israel | Novartis Investigative Site | Petach Tikva | |
Israel | Novartis Investigative Site | Zerifin | HaMerkaz |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Avellino | AV |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Bari | BA |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Bassano Del Grappa | VI |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Milano | MI |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Milano | MI |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Novara | |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Aomori | |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Fukuoka city | Fukuoka |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Gifu-city | Gifu |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Isehara | Kanagawa |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Itabashi-ku | Tokyo |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Kobe-city | Hyogo |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Matsuyama-city | Ehime |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Narita | Chiba |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Shinjuku-ku | Tokyo |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Suita | Osaka |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Yamagata | |
Malaysia | Novartis Investigative Site | Johor Bahru | |
Malaysia | Novartis Investigative Site | Kuala Lumpur | MYS |
Malaysia | Novartis Investigative Site | Kuching | Sarawak |
Malaysia | Novartis Investigative Site | Penang | |
Malaysia | Novartis Investigative Site | Pulau Pinang | |
Malaysia | Novartis Investigative Site | Selangor | |
Romania | Novartis Investigative Site | Bucuresti | |
Singapore | Novartis Investigative Site | Singapore | |
Singapore | Novartis Investigative Site | Singapore | |
Spain | Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Catalunya |
Spain | Novartis Investigative Site | Murcia | |
Taiwan | Novartis Investigative Site | Taoyuan | |
Thailand | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Novartis Investigative Site | Chiang Mai | |
United Kingdom | Novartis Investigative Site | Leeds | |
United Kingdom | Novartis Investigative Site | London | |
United Kingdom | Novartis Investigative Site | London | |
United States | Montefiore Medical Center . | Bronx | New York |
United States | Gabrail Cancer Center | Canton | Ohio |
United States | STAT Research Inc Premier Clin Res LLC STAT Res | Dayton | Ohio |
United States | Napa Research | Margate | Florida |
United States | University of Minnesota Med Center | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Inspira Medical Cent Mullica Hill | Mullica Hill | New Jersey |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
United States, Argentina, Australia, China, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Romania, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Binary variable indicating whether a patient achieves a durable response | Durable response: hemoglobin level =10 g/dL and =2 g/dL increase from baseline, for a period of at least eight consecutive weeks between W9 and W25, in the absence of rescue medication or prohibited treatment | Randomization to Week 25 | |
Secondary | Duration of response (Key Secondary) | • For patients who previously reached durable response:
Time from first hemoglobin assessment showing durable response to confirmed loss of durable response, defined as the first of the following events: hemoglobin level <10 g/dL in at least two consecutive weekly assessments, start of any rescue medication or prohibited treatment, death; • For patients who did not achieve the durable response according to primary endpoint definition: duration will be 0 days |
Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Time from randomization to start of durable response in each treatment group | Durable response is defined as in primary endpoint. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Time from randomization to start of first response in each treatment group | Response is defined as hemoglobin level of at least 10 g/dL and an increase of at least 2 g/dl from baseline, or normalization of hemoglobin (at least 11 g/dL for women and 12 g/dL for men), without biochemical resolution of hemolysis. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Time from randomization to start of complete response in each treatment group | Complete response is defined as normalization of hemoglobin levels and no evidence of hemolysis (normal levels of indirect bilirubin, LDH, haptoglobin and reticulocytes), in the absence of red blood cell transfusions. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Response rate | Assessment of quality of response in each treatment group. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Complete response rate | Assessment of complete response rate in each treatment group. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Hemoglobine Levels | Assessment of hemoglobin levels in each treatment group. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Number of participants who received rescue treatment (overall & by type of rescue treatment) | This is to assess the need for rescue treatment in all treatment groups, measured as time-standardized numbers of each type of rescue treatment and as change from baseline in time-standardized number of transfusions. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Percentage of participants who received rescue treatment (overall & by type of rescue treatment) | This is to assess the need for rescue treatment in all treatment groups. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in the the frequency and absolute number of CD19+ B cell counts | Change from baseline in the the frequency and absolute number of CD19+ B cell counts in whole blood | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Time to first occurrence of B cell recovery, defined as =80% of baseline or =50 cells/µL | Time to first occurrence of B cell recovery, defined as =80% of baseline or =50 cells/µL in whole blood | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin levels | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin levels (change in titers of IgG, IgM, IgA) | Randomization until month 30 | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in the 8 domain scores and in the summary scores (PCS, MCS) of SF-36 questionnaire | SF-36 v2.0 (acute) includes 36 items that assess general health related quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional health and mental health.
Scores for the 8 domains are generated, as well as a physical component summary (PCS) score and a mental component summary (MCS) score. Responses to items are based on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores below 50 indicate less than average health, while scores above 50 indicate better than average health. |
Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in the T-score of PROMIS Fatigue-13a questionnaire | Assessment of quality of life in each treatment group. The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Fatigue-13a includes 13 items that assess fatigue. All items in the PROMIS-Fatigue-13a utilize a 5-point response scale (e.g., not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, very much).
Higher scores on the PROMIS-Fatigue-13a represent greater fatigue. |
Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) | |
Secondary | Ianalumab PK parameter - AUClast | AUClast: area under the curve from time zero to last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast). | After first dose of study treatment (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours post dose) and after last dose (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours, 1344 hours, 2016 hours and 3360 hours post dose). | |
Secondary | Ianalumab PK parameter - AUCtau | AUCtau: the AUV calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau). | After first dose of study treatment (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours post dose) and after last dose (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours, 1344 hours, 2016 hours and 3360 hours post dose). | |
Secondary | Ianalumab PK parameter - Accumulation ratio Racc | Accumulation ratio calculated using AUC values obtained between last and first dose | After last dose (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours, 1344 hours, 2016 hours and 3360 hours post dose). | |
Secondary | Ianalumab PK parameter - Cmax | Maximum (peak) observed plasma, blood, serum or other body fluid drug concentration | After first dose of study treatment (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours post dose) and after last dose (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours, 1344 hours, 2016 hours and 3360 hours post dose). | |
Secondary | Ianalumab PK parameter - Tmax | Time to reach maximum (peak) plasma, blood, serum or other body fluid drug concentration | After first dose of study treatment (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours post dose) and after last dose (pre-dose, 2 hours, 336 hours, 672 hours, 1344 hours, 2016 hours and 3360 hours post dose). | |
Secondary | Immunogenicity of ianalumab | Incidence and titer of anti-ianalumab antibodies in serum (ADA assay) over time. Confirmed anti-drug-antibody positive samples will be further characterized for neutralizing capacity. | Randomization to end of study (up to 39 months after randomization of last patient) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT04661033 -
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Isatuximab in Adults With Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04691570 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ANX005 in Participants With Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT05073458 -
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Parsaclisib in Participants With Primary Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02502903 -
Safety, Tolerability and Activity of BIVV009 in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Complement Mediated Disorders
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05002777 -
Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Rilzabrutinib in Patients With Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)
|
Phase 2 |