Glaucoma Treatment Using Focused Ultrasound Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy and Safety of UCP in the Treatment of Primary Glaucoma in China
Verified date | October 2019 |
Source | EyeTechCare |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To collect safety and efficacy data on Ultrasound Cycle Plasty treatment (UCP) in primary glaucoma asian patients.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | November 2, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | April 29, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Primary Open Angle and primary Angle Closure glaucoma - Subject where the IOP is not adequately controlled with glaucoma medication, and can not or not agree for incisional glaucoma surgery - IOP = 21 mmHg and = 40 mmHg - Best Corrected Visual Acuity > Hand Motion - Patient able and willing to sign the informed consent and complete postoperative followup requirements Exclusion Criteria: - History of ocular or retrobulbar tumor - Ocular infection within 14 days prior to the procedure of Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty (UCP) - History of Cyclo-destructive procedures (cryotherapy, Laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation; Laser endophotocoagulation) - Congenital glaucoma - History of ciliary body surgery or vitrectomy in the study eye - Ocular disease other than glaucoma that may affect assessment of visual acuity and/or IOP (choroidal hemorrhage or detachment, lens subluxation, thyroid ophthalmopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, clinical significant macular edema, retinal detachment) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | E&ENT Fudan University | Shanghai | |
China | Shanghai Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment Center - Department of Ophthalmology | Shanghai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
EyeTechCare |
China,
Aptel F, Denis P, Rouland JF, Renard JP, Bron A. Multicenter clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in glaucoma patients without previous filtering surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;94(5):e268-77. doi: 10.1111/aos.12913. Epub 2015 Nov 7. — View Citation
De Gregorio A, Pedrotti E, Stevan G, Montali M, Morselli S. Safety and efficacy of multiple cyclocoagulation of ciliary bodies by high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;255(12):2429-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3817-4. Epub 2017 Oct 17. — View Citation
Giannaccare G, Vagge A, Sebastiani S, Urbini LE, Corazza P, Pellegrini M, Carmassi L, Bergamini F, Traverso CE, Campos EC. Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty in Patients with Glaucoma: 1-Year Results from a Multicentre Prospective Study. Ophthalmic Res. 2019;61(3):137-142. doi: 10.1159/000487953. Epub 2018 May 16. — View Citation
Melamed S, Goldenfeld M, Cotlear D, Skaat A, Moroz I. High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in refractory glaucoma patients: results at 1 year of prospective clinical study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):483-9. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000620. Epub 2015 May 13. — View Citation
Pellegrini M, Sebastiani S, Giannaccare G, Campos EC. Intraocular inflammation after Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty for the treatment of glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 18;12(2):338-341. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.02.23. eCollection 2019. — View Citation
Posarelli C, Covello G, Bendinelli A, Fogagnolo P, Nardi M, Figus M. High-intensity focused ultrasound procedure: The rise of a new noninvasive glaucoma procedure and its possible future applications. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov - Dec;64(6):826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 22. Review. — View Citation
Torky MA, Al Zafiri YA, Hagras SM, Khattab AM, Bassiouny RM, Mokbel TH. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound ciliary plasty as a primary intervention in glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 18;12(4):597-602. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.04.12. eCollection 2019. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Efficacy endpoint : reduction of the intraocular pressure | Reduction of the intraocular pressure relative to the preoperative value at each follow-up visits in mmHg and in % of reduction | 6 months | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint: rate of per operative complications | Rate of per-operative device and/or procedure related adverse events | 6 months | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint: rate of post-operative complications | Rate of post-operative complications during the follow-up period | 6 months | |
Secondary | Efficacy endpoint: Number of ocular hypotensive medications | Mean number of IOP lowering medications at each visit during the follow-up period | 6 months |