Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02190435
Other study ID # 2014-111
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 11, 2014
Last updated June 15, 2016
Start date July 2014
Est. completion date January 2016

Study information

Verified date June 2016
Source William Beaumont Hospitals
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review BoardUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

There are approximately 250,000 hip fractures in the US every year, and intertrochanteric (IT) fractures (fractures that occur just below the femoral head) account for nearly half of these fractures. The use of intramedullary (IM) nails for fixation of IT femur fractures has become a well-accepted and increasingly more common procedure among orthopaedic traumatologists, and is standard of care at our institution.

While advancements in intramedullary nail fixation have made it a relatively efficient procedure, the placement of the lag screw into the femoral head still remains a challenging step in the procedure. Inaccurate placement can lead to screw cut-out, one of the most commonly reported complications with IM nail fixation. Previous work has shown that the lag screw position is an important factor in reducing screw cut-out. This step of the procedure can be time demanding and often requires several intraoperative radiographs for accurate placement. Recently developed computer-assisted navigation systems provide surgeons with the ability to track screw placement in real-time. This could allow for improved screw placement and potentially reduce radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon. To date, the potential advantages of computer-assisted navigation have not been examined.

The primary objective of this study is to examine whether the use of Stryker's ADAPT computer-assisted navigation for Gamma nail fixation can result in improved lag screw placement. The secondary objective is to examine whether the use of the ADAPT for Gamma nail fixation can reduce intraoperative radiation exposure.Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in the lag screw placement (i.e. tip to apex distance measurement) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation. Additionally, we hypothesize that there is a difference in radiation exposure (i.e. fluoroscopy time) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 65
Est. completion date January 2016
Est. primary completion date January 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients undergoing hip fracture fixation with a Gamma Nail by one of four orthopaedic trauma surgeons at William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak

- Diagnosis of an intertrochanteric femur fracture (AO Classification 31-A1,A2)

- Low energy mechanism of injury (i.e. fall, twist)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Minors (less than 18 years)

- Pregnant

- Have a high energy mechanism of injury (e.g. motor vehicle accident, fall from height)

- Have an open fracture (i.e. the skin is broken at the fracture site), or

- Present with multiple injuries to the ipsilateral lower extremity

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation
Adaptive Positioning Technology for Gamma 3

Locations

Country Name City State
United States William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak Michigan

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
William Beaumont Hospitals Stryker Orthopaedics

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (4)

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64. — View Citation

De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357. — View Citation

Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2010 Jun;34(5):719-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7. Epub 2009 Jul 18. — View Citation

Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary tip-to-apex distance Distance between lag screw tip and head surface as measured on the ADAPT system Intraoperative Yes
Secondary Radiation exposure Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure time for lag screw placement (seconds) Intraoperative Yes