Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, Including Leigh Syndrome Clinical Trial
— MITO-001Official title:
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103) for Treatment of Children With Inherited Mitochondrial Disease
| Verified date | October 2017 |
| Source | Horizon Pharma USA, Inc. |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of cysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules (RP103) administered up to 1.3 g/m²/day in two divided doses, every 12 hours, for up to 6 months in patients with inherited mitochondrial disease.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 36 |
| Est. completion date | October 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | October 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 6 Years to 17 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age = 6 years and < 18 years 2. Body weight = 5 kg 3. Documented (genetically confirmed known mutation, i.e. no variants of uncertain significance) diagnosis of inherited mitochondrial disease other than Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) 4. Moderate disease severity based on Newcastle Pediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) score, with a score between 15 to 45 inclusive [Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) subjects are exempt of this inclusion criteria], if approved by the sponsor. 5. For patients regularly taking dietary supplements such as creatinine, alpha-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), vitamin B, carnitine, etc. they have to have been taking them for at least 3 months pre-study and will agree to keep these the same throughout the study (from the Screening Visit to Study Exit) 6. With respect to concomitant medications, the subject must: 1. Be willing to abstain from initiating dietary supplements and non-prescribed medications, except as allowed by the Investigator, throughout the study (from the Screening Visit to Study Exit); 2. Be on a stable dose of medications prescribed for seizure management and prevention. Stable dose in this context means unchanged for at least 30 days prior to the Screening Visit. 7. Willing and able to comply with study drug dosing requirements, i.e. ingest the RP103 capsules intact, or sprinkled in liquid or soft food, or using a g-tube 8. Sexually active female subjects of childbearing potential (i.e., not surgically sterile [tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy]) must agree to utilize two of the following acceptable forms of contraception throughout the study (from the Screening Visit to Study Exit): 1. Hormonal contraception: birth control pills, injection, patch, vaginal ring or implant; 2. Condom or diaphragm, with spermicide; 3. Intrauterine device (IUD) 4. Sterile male partner (vasectomy performed at least 6 months prior to the study). 9. Subjects's legally authorized representative must provide written informed consent; Subject must provide assent, if required by local/institutional requirements 10. Have mitochondrial myopathy as evidenced by one or more of the following criteria: 1. Weakness consistent with myopathy (e.g. accompanied by muscle wasting and/or absence of neuropathy) on physical exam 2. OR documented myopathy on the basis of muscle biopsy consistent with mitochondrial myopathy disease 3. OR weakness and/or progressive exercise intolerance (in which modest exercise typically provokes heaviness, weakness, aching of active muscles, or tachycardia). Weakness should be due to myopathy and not neuropathy or other causes as deemed by investigator Exclusion Criteria: 1. Documented diagnosis of concurrent inborn errors of metabolism 2. Non-elective hospitalization related to mitochondrial disease or direct complication of disease within 60 days prior to the Screening Visit. 3. Platelet count, lymphocyte count or hemoglobin below the lower limit of normal (LLN) at the Screening Visit 4. Hepatic insufficiency with liver enzyme tests (alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] or alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at the Screening Visit 5. Bilirubin > 1.2 g/dL at the Screening Visit 6. Inability to complete the elements of the study, e.g., coma, hemodynamic instability or requiring continuous ventilator support. 7. Malabsorption requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN), chronic diarrhea, bouts of pseudo obstruction 8. Severe end-organ hypo-perfusion syndrome secondary to cardiac failure resulting in lactic acidosis 9. Patients with suspected elevated intracranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) and/or papilledema 10. Severe gastrointestinal disease including gastroparesis 11. History of angina, myocardial infarction, or cardiac surgery within 2 years prior to the Screening Visit 12. Any clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG), including dysrhythmia, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding not already listed above at the Screening Visit 13. History of drug or alcohol abuse 14. History of pancreatitis 15. Participated in an investigational drug trial within 30 days or, within 90 days for a biologic, device, or surgical treatment, for inherited mitochondrial diseases prior to the Screening Visit 16. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cysteamine and penicillamine 17. Female subjects who are nursing, planning a pregnancy, known or suspected to be pregnant, or with a positive serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit 18. Subject's who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are not able or willing to comply with the protocol. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Akron Children's Hospital | Akron | Ohio |
| United States | Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas |
| United States | University of Utah, Division of Medical Genetics | Salt Lake City | Utah |
| United States | University of California at San Diego (UCSD) | San Diego | California |
| United States | Stanford University | Stanford | California |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Horizon Pharma USA, Inc. |
United States,
Bousquet M, Gibrat C, Ouellet M, Rouillard C, Calon F, Cicchetti F. Cystamine metabolism and brain transport properties: clinical implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurochem. 2010 Sep;114(6):1651-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06874.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19. — View Citation
Maher P, Lewerenz J, Lozano C, Torres JL. A novel approach to enhancing cellular glutathione levels. J Neurochem. 2008 Nov;107(3):690-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05620.x. Epub 2008 Aug 12. — View Citation
Mancuso M, Orsucci D, Logerfo A, Rocchi A, Petrozzi L, Nesti C, Galetta F, Santoro G, Murri L, Siciliano G. Oxidative stress biomarkers in mitochondrial myopathies, basally and after cysteine donor supplementation. J Neurol. 2010 May;257(5):774-81. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5409-7. Epub 2009 Dec 4. — View Citation
Salmi H, Leonard JV, Rahman S, Lapatto R. Plasma thiol status is altered in children with mitochondrial diseases. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2012 Apr;72(2):152-7. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2011.646299. Epub 2012 Jan 2. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IV | The NPMDS evaluates the progression of mitochondrial disease in pediatric patients in 4 domains: I - Current Function (vision, hearing, communication, feeding, and mobility) with scores ranging from 0 to 21; II -System Specific Involvement (seizures, encephalopathy, bleeding diathesis or coagulation defects, gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, liver, and blood) with scores ranging from 0 to 30. III - Current Clinical Assessment (growth and development over past 6 months, vision, strabismus and eye movement, myopathy, ataxia, pyramidal, extrapyramidal, and neuropathy) with scores ranging from 0 to 28; and IV - Quality of Life with scores ranging from 0 to 25. For sections I-III, higher scores reflect more severe disease. For Section IV, a higher score reflects a lower quality of life. |
Baseline through Week 24 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Glutathione | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | ||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Glutathione Disulfide | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | ||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Lactic Acid | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | ||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test | The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: Myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Myopathy was assessed using the 6 minute walk test, which measures the distance walked in a 6 minute walk test. |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Jamar Dynamometer Hand Strength | The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Myopathy was assessed using standard grip strength evaluation, which measures hand strength in both hands using a Jamar dynamometer. |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale Total Score | The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Dystonia symptoms were assessed using the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale for Dystonia. Participants were assessed for dystonia in each of the following regions: eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, and each upper and lower extremity (8 body regions) on a scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). The individual scores were summed to calculate the total score which ranges from 0 (dystonia absent) to 32 (severe dystonia). |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale | The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Ataxia was assessed using the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS). FARS comprises a functional ataxia staging score of overall mobility (score 0 to 6), an assessment of the activities of daily living (ADL) (score 0 to 36) and a neurological assessment (score from 0 to 117) which is composed of bulbar (score 0-11), upper limb (score 0- 36) and lower limb (score 0-16), peripheral nerve (score 0-26) and upright stability/gait (score 0-28). The scores were summed to calculate the total score which ranges from 0 to 159. A higher score indicates a greater level of disability. |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Gross Motor Function | The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Retarded motor development was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 which consists of 88 items scored on a scale of 0 to 3: 0: Does not initiate the task; Initiates the task (completes < 10%); Partially completes the task (10 to 99%); Completes the task (100%). The 88 items are grouped into five dimensions: 1) lying and rolling, 2) sitting, 3) crawling and kneeling, 4) standing, and 5) walking, running and jumping. Scores are expressed as a percentage of the maximum score for that dimension. The total score is the average of the 5 the percentage scores where higher scores indicate better performance. |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Lansky Play Performance Scale | The investigator selected the 2 most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms were assessed at each subsequent study visit. Reduced activities of daily living was assessed using the modified Lansky Play Performance Scale, completed by parents based on their child's activity in the past week, where 100=fully active; 90=minor restrictions in strenuous physical activity; 80=active, gets tired more quickly; 70=greater restriction of play, less time spent in play activity; 60=up and around, active play minimal; quieter activities; 50=lying around much of the day; no active playing, all quiet play and activities; 40=mainly in bed; quiet activities; 30=bedbound; needs assistance even for quiet play; 20=sleeps often; play limited to very passive activities; 10=doesn't play or get out of bed; 5=unresponsive 0=dead |
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 |