Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01997918
Other study ID # KTS 2. Haplo HSCT
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date October 2013
Est. completion date December 30, 2017

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source University Hospital Tuebingen
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of natural killer (NK)-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2.


Description:

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative HLA identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of NK-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2. We will describe and quantify the specific patient, donor, treatment, graft and outcomes characteristics associated with the course of treatment. To assess and control for the bias that is associated with the retrospective nature of this study, we will emphasize to collect clearly stated reasons for the decision to use a haploidentical transplant, e.g. as opposed to drug therapy or a second transplant from the original or an alternative HLA identical donor. This is a retrospective observational cohort study. German centers performing allogeneic HSCT are asked to contribute. Data will be validated and missing information will be further retrieved by the four principal investigators through phone. Final follow up will be performed in April 2014, 2014. To be able to supply durable data on the primary endpoints, only patients receiving a haploidentical HSCT2 between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013 will be included.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date December 30, 2017
Est. primary completion date December 30, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Age >18 years at time of HSCT2

- Malignant hematologic disease

- Informed consent signed by the patients on the use of data in registry analyses

- 1st allogeneic HSCT performed from any donor, including haploidentical HSCT1

- Hematological or extramedullary relapse after HSCT1

- Haploidentical 2nd allogeneic HSCT (i.e. >= 2 Antigen mismatch family donor) between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013

Third or higher allogeneic HSCT does not preclude analysis as long as HSCT2 was haploidentical.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Recurrence
  • Relapse of Hematological Malignancies

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital Tuebingen Klinikum Augsburg, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Treatment related mortality (TRM) of haploidentical HSCT2 up to day 365
Primary Toxicity of haploidentical HSCT2 NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4 up to day 365
Secondary complete remission (CR) rate after haploidentical HSCT2 day 100
Secondary Overall survival (OS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2 2 years
Secondary Graft versus host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical HSCT2 2 years
Secondary Incidence of rejection after haploidentical HSCT2 1 year
Secondary Disease free survival (DFS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2 2 years