Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01808092
Other study ID # D4281C00001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received February 28, 2013
Last updated September 1, 2017
Start date April 2013
Est. completion date January 2016

Study information

Verified date September 2017
Source Pfizer
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam compared to Meropenem for treating hospitalized adults with nosocomial pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumonia


Description:

A Phase III, Randomized, Multicentre, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Hospitalized Adults


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 969
Est. completion date January 2016
Est. primary completion date January 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- 18 to 90 years of age inclusive

- Females can participate if surgically sterile or completed menopause; if able to have children, must have negative serum pregnancy test, agree not to attempt pregnancy and use acceptable contraception while receiving study therapy and for 1 week after

- Onset of symptoms = 48 hours after admission or <7 days after discharge from an inpatient acute or chronic care facility

- New or worsening infiltrate on chest X-ray obtained within 48 hours prior to randomization

- At least 1 of the following systemic signs:Fever (temperature >38 C) or hypothermia (rectal/core temperature <35 C); White blood cell count >10,000 cells/mm3, or White blood cell count <4500 cells/mm3, or >15% band forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pulmonary disease that, in the investigator's judgment, would preclude evaluation of therapeutic response (e.g. lung cancer, active tuberculosis, cystic fibrosis, granulomatous disease, fungal pulmonary infection or recent pulmonary embolism).

- Patients with lung abscess, pleural empyema or post obstructive pneumonia.

- Patients with an estimated creatinine clearance <16ml/min by Cockcroft Gault formula or patients expected to require haemodialysis or other renal support while on study therapy.

- Acute hepatitis in the prior 6 months, cirrhosis, acute hepatic failure or acute decompensation of chronic hepatic failure.

- Patients receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
ceftazidim-avibactam (CAZ-AVI, experimental product)
2000mg ceftazidime plus 500mg avibactam
meropenem (active comparator)
1000mg of Meropenem

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Research Site Buenos Aires
Argentina Research Site Cordoba
Argentina Research Site Florida
Argentina Research Site La Plata
Argentina Research Site Mendoza
Brazil Research Site Belo Horizonte
Brazil Research Site Campinas/SP
Brazil Research Site Curitiba
Brazil Research Site São José do Rio Preto
Bulgaria Research Site Burgas
Bulgaria Research Site Plovdiv
Bulgaria Research Site Ruse
Bulgaria Research Site Sofia
China Research Site Beijing
China Research Site Changsha
China Research Site Chengdu
China Research Site Chongqing
China Research Site Guangzhou
China Research Site Haikou
China Research Site Hangzhou
China Research Site Jiangyin
China Research Site Nanchang
China Research Site Qingdao
China Research Site Sanya
China Research Site Shanghai
China Research Site Shenyang
China Research Site Shenzhen
China Research Site Suzhou
China Research Site Tianjin
China Research Site Xi'an
China Research Site Xiamen
China Research Site Yangzhou
China Research Site Zhanjiang
Czechia Research Site Kolin
Czechia Research Site Kyjov
Czechia Research Site Praha 10, Prague
France Research Site Limoges
France Research Site Nantes Cedex 1
France Research Site Paris 14
France Research Site Paris Cedex
France Research Site Pierre Benite Cedex
France Research Site Poitiers Cedex
France Research Site Strasbourg Cedex
France Research Site Tours
Hungary Research Site Budapest
Hungary Research Site Miskolc
Hungary Research Site Székesfehérvár
Hungary Research Site Veszprém
India Research Site Bangalore
India Research Site Jaipur
India Research Site Lucknow
India Research Site Pune
India Research Site Varanasi
Italy Research Site Bologna
Japan Research Site Fukuoka-shi
Japan Research Site Higashiibaraki-gun
Japan Research Site Ikeda-shi
Japan Research Site Itabashi-ku
Japan Research Site Izumo-shi
Japan Research Site Kagoshima-shi
Japan Research Site Kawasaki-shi
Japan Research Site Kitakyushu-shi
Japan Research Site Kushiro-shi
Japan Research Site Matsuyama-shi
Japan Research Site Osaka-shi
Japan Research Site Saga-shi
Japan Research Site Sapporo-shi
Japan Research Site Sasebo-shi
Japan Research Site Tsuchiura-shi
Japan Research Site Tsukubo-gun
Japan Research Site Uji-shi
Japan Research Site Uki-shi
Japan Research Site Yanai-shi
Korea, Republic of Research Site Ansan-si
Korea, Republic of Research Site Anyang-si
Korea, Republic of Research Site Incheon
Korea, Republic of Research Site Jinju-si
Korea, Republic of Research Site Seoul
Korea, Republic of Research Site Wonju-si
Latvia Research Site Liepaja
Mexico Research Site Guadalajara
Mexico Research Site Monterrey
Peru Research Site Cusco
Peru Research Site Lima
Philippines Research Site Iloilo City
Philippines Research Site Quezon City
Poland Research Site Bydgoszcz
Poland Research Site Chrzanów
Poland Research Site Leczna
Poland Research Site Lublin
Poland Research Site Olsztyn
Poland Research Site Proszowice
Poland Research Site Suwalki
Romania Research Site Craiova
Romania Research Site Timisoara
Russian Federation Research Site Arkhangelsk
Russian Federation Research Site Chelyabinsk
Russian Federation Research Site Moscow
Russian Federation Research Site Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Research Site Smolensk
Russian Federation Research Site St. Petersburg
Russian Federation Research Site Zelenograd
Slovenia Research Site Golnik
South Africa Research Site Randburg
Spain Research Site Barcelona
Spain Research Site Madrid
Spain Research Site Sabadell(Barcelona)
Spain Research Site Terrassa (Barcelona)
Taiwan Research Site Taichung
Turkey Research Site Ankara
Ukraine Research Site Dnipropetrovsk
Ukraine Research Site Donetsk
Ukraine Research Site Ivano-Frankivsk
Ukraine Research Site Kharkiv
Ukraine Research Site Kyiv
Ukraine Research Site Mykolayiv
Ukraine Research Site Poltava
Ukraine Research Site Vinnytsia
United Kingdom Research Site Birmingham
United Kingdom Research Site Blackpool
United Kingdom Research Site Guildford
United Kingdom Research Site Hull
Vietnam Research Site Hanoi
Vietnam Research Site Ho Chi Minh
Vietnam Research Site Hochiminh

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pfizer

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Argentina,  Brazil,  Bulgaria,  China,  Czechia,  France,  Hungary,  India,  Italy,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Latvia,  Mexico,  Peru,  Philippines,  Poland,  Romania,  Russian Federation,  Slovenia,  South Africa,  Spain,  Taiwan,  Turkey,  Ukraine,  United Kingdom,  Vietnam, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set (Co-primary Analyses) The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Primary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at TOC Analysis Set (Co-primary Analyses) The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Evaluable Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Clinically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved such that all antibacterial therapies for Nosocomial Pneumonia are stopped. No antibacterial therapy other than those outlined by the protocol has been administered for Nosocomial Pneumonia prior to end of treatment. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Clinical Cure in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: the patient was not a clinical failure at end of treatment and the patient is alive and all signs and symptoms of pneumonia have resolved or improved to an extent that no antibacterial therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia was taken between end of treatment and test-of-cure inclusive. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary Number of Patients With a Favorable Per-patient Microbiologic Response in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set Per-patient "favorable" response indicates that all of the patient's baseline pathogens are "eradicated" or "presumed eradicated". Eradication is defined as: source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication is defined as: source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at End of Treatment Visit The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at End of Treatment Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. Patients were followed after the last IV dose but no later than 24 hours after the last IV dose.
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Extended Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiologic Responses in Patients With Pathogens Resistant to Ceftazidime at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients with a favorable per-pathogen microbiological response: favorable microbiological response includes: Eradication where, source specimen demonstrates absence of the original baseline pathogen. Presumed eradication where, source specimen was not available to culture and the patient was assessed as a clinical cure. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in microbiologically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at test-of-cure visit. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Test-of-cure Visit The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in clinically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at test-of-cure visit. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) at Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in the clinically evaluable at test-of-cure analysis set. At the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 21 to 25)
Secondary The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Day 28 The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in microbiologically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at day 28. at Day 28 from randomization
Secondary The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set at Day 28 The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in clinically modified intent-to-treat analysis set at day 28. at Day 28 from randomization
Secondary The Number of Patients With Death Due to Any Cause (All-cause Mortality) in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set at Day 28 The number of patients with death due to any cause (all-cause mortality) in the clinically evaluable at test-of-cure analysis set at day 28. at Day 28 from randomization
Secondary The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set The number of patients discharged from hospital in microbiologically modified intent-to-treat analysis set. up to 25 days from randomization
Secondary The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat Analysis Set The number of patients discharged from hospital in the clinically modified intent-to-treat analysis set. up to 25 days from randomization
Secondary The Number of Patients Discharged From Hospital up to Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at Test-of-cure Analysis Set The number of patients discharged from hospital in the clinically evaluable at test-of-cure analysis set. up to 25 days from randomization
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04926493 - Structural and Microbiological Characterization of Endotracheal Tube Biofilm in Patients at Increased Risk for the Development of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit
Terminated NCT01853982 - Study of Intravenous Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Compared to Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Phase 3
Suspended NCT04620941 - Use of Reticulocyte Ratio and Neutrophil / Lymphocyte Ratio in the Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia