Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Trial of Ethanol Lock Therapy for Treatment and Secondary Prophylaxis of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) in Children and Adolescents
| Verified date | August 2017 |
| Source | St. Jude Children's Research Hospital |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Use of long-term central venous access devices (including tunneled lines and ports) can be associated with development of bloodstream infection caused by build-up of bacteria or fungus on the inside of the device, called central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). This infection generally requires hospital admission and antibiotic therapy. This treatment usually helps eradicate the infection but sometimes it is not possible to clear or it comes back after treatment. Also, once someone has had one line infection the chance of getting another one is higher. This study will test whether treatment and secondary prophylaxis of CLABSI with ethanol lock therapy (ELT) can significantly reduce the risk of treatment failure (comprising failure to clear initial infection, relapse or reinfection) in children and adolescents treated for cancer or hematologic disorders or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). ELT involves injecting a solution of ethanol and water into the line or port, allowing it to dwell for 2 hours, and then withdrawing the solution.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 95 |
| Est. completion date | November 11, 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | November 11, 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 6 Months to 25 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects =6 months to < 25 years of age who are =5kg - New diagnosis (within 96 hours of collection of first positive blood culture) of CLABSI (participants with previous CLABSI will be eligible if not previously enrolled in the study) - Silicone CVAD in situ (ports, Hickman and Broviac lines will all be eligible) - Treating clinician plans to attempt salvage of CVAD - Participant is receiving treatment for cancer or any hematologic disorder or is receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at a participating institution. Exclusion Criteria: - Allergy to ethanol or components of placebo lock - Concomitant use of metronidazole, disulfiram or trabectedin - Plan to remove CVAD within 6 days - Continuous use of all lumens of CVAD leading to anticipated inability to lock each lumen for at least 2 hours per day - Known CVAD obstruction - Subjects who are capable of becoming pregnant will require an negative pregnancy test before entry to study - Use of ELT in the preceding 2 weeks - Expected survival <6 days - Proven alternative source of bloodstream infection (BSI), or clinical evidence of CVAD track or port-pocket infection - Multiple long-term CVADs in situ |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne | Parkville | Victoria |
| United States | St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Memphis | Tennessee |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| St. Jude Children's Research Hospital |
United States, Australia,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Therapeutic Failures (Early or Late Failure) in Children and Adolescents With CLABSI Receiving Standard Care Plus Ethanol Lock Therapy (ELT) vs. Standard Care Alone | Therapeutic failure was a pre-defined composite outcome comprising either 'early failure': central line removal, death, persistent positive blood cultures for >72 hours, development of new CLABSI, or initiation of other ALT) during the 5 day treatment phase, or 'late failure': relapse (new CLABSI with an identical organism), or reinfection (new CLABSI with a different organism) during the 24 week prophylaxis phase. The percentage of evaluable participants with therapeutic failure is reported. | Up to 25 weeks after the start of treatment. | |
| Secondary | Cumulative Incidence of Therapeutic Failure in Participants Receiving Standard Care Plus ELT vs. Standard Care Alone | Therapeutic failure was a pre-defined composite outcome comprising either 'early failure': central line removal, death, persistent positive blood cultures for >72 hours, development of new CLABSI, or initiation of other ALT) during the 5 day treatment phase, or 'late failure': relapse (new CLABSI with an identical organism), or reinfection (new CLABSI with a different organism) during the 24 week prophylaxis phase. The cumulative incidence of therapeutic failure is reported. | Up to 25 weeks after the start of treatment | |
| Secondary | Cumulative Incidence of Relapse in Participants Receiving Standard Care Plus ELT vs. Standard Care Alone | Relapse was defined as new CLABSI with an identical organism occurring during the 24 week prophylaxis phase. The percentage of evaluable participants with relapse is reported. | Up to 25 weeks after the start of treatment | |
| Secondary | Cumulative Incidence of Reinfection in Participants Receiving Standard Care Plus ELT vs. Standard Care Alone | Reinfection was defined as new CLABSI with a different organism occurring during the 24 week prophylaxis phase. The percentage of evaluable participants with reinfection is reported. | Up to 25 weeks after the start of treatment. | |
| Secondary | Rate of Central Venous Access Device (CVAD) Occlusion Events in Participants Receiving Standard Care Plus ELT vs. Standard Care Alone | Occlusion was defined as central line occlusion or dysfunction requiring thrombolytic therapy. The percentage of evaluable participants requiring thrombolytic therapy for central line occlusion is reported. | Up to 26 weeks after the start of treatment. | |
| Secondary | Adverse Events in Participants Receiving Standard Care Plus ELT vs. Standard Care Alone | Adverse events attributable to lock therapy or related to the central venous access device (CVAD) were elicited from direct questioning at study visits and from the medical record. The percentage of evaluable participants with any potentially attributable adverse effect is reported. | Up to 37.5 weeks after the start of treatment. |