Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial
— PoseidonDCMOfficial title:
A Phase I/II, Randomized Pilot Study of the Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.
Verified date | January 2018 |
Source | University of Miami |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The technique of transplanting progenitor cells into a region of damaged myocardium, termed
cellular cardiomyoplasty1, is a potentially new therapeutic modality designed to replace or
repair necrotic, scarred, or dysfunctional myocardium2-4. Ideally, graft cells should be
readily available, easy to culture to ensure adequate quantities for transplantation, and
able to survive in host myocardium; often a hostile environment of limited blood supply and
immunorejection. Whether effective cellular regenerative strategies require that administered
cells differentiate into adult cardiomyocytes and couple electromechanically with the
surrounding myocardium is increasingly controversial and recent evidence suggests that this
may not be required for effective cardiac repair. Most importantly, transplantation of graft
cells should improve cardiac function and prevent adverse ventricular remodeling. To date, a
number of candidate cells have been transplanted in experimental models, including fetal and
neonatal cardiomyocytes5, embryonic stem cell-derived myocytes6, 7, tissue engineered
contractile grafts8, skeletal myoblasts9, several cell types derived from adult bone
marrow10-15, and cardiac precursors residing within the heart itself16. There has been
substantial clinical development in the use of whole bone marrow and skeletal myoblast
preparations in studies enrolling both post-infarction patients, and patients with chronic
ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. The effects of bone-marrow derived
mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have also been studied clinically.
Currently, bone marrow or bone marrow-derived cells represent highly promising modality for
cardiac repair. The totality of evidence from trials investigating autologous whole bone
marrow infusions into patients following myocardial infarction supports the safety of this
approach. In terms of efficacy, increases in ejection fraction are reported in the majority
of the trials.
Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is a common and problematic condition; definitive therapy
in the form of heart transplantation is available to only a tiny minority of eligible
patients. Cellular cardiomyoplasty for chronic heart failure has been studied less than for
acute MI, but represents a potentially important alternative for this disease.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 37 |
Est. completion date | August 28, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | August 28, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 95 Years |
Eligibility |
Major Inclusion Criteria: - Be = 18 and < 95 years of age. - Provide written informed consent. - Diagnosis of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. - Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization within 5 to 10 weeks of screening. - Been treated with appropriate maximal medical therapy for heart failure. - Ejection fraction below 40% and either a left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) > 5.9cm in male subjects, an LVEDD of > 5.6cm in female subjects or left ventricular end diastolic volume index > 125 mL/m2 - Be able to undergo an MRI or CT. Major Exclusion Criteria: - Baseline glomerular filtration rate equal or < 45 ml/min/1.73m2. - Be eligible for or require standard-of-care surgical or percutaneous intervention for the treatment of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. - Presence of a prosthetic aortic valve or heart constrictive device. - Presence of a prosthetic mitral valve. - Previous myocardial infarction (MI) as documented by a clinical history that will include an elevation of cardiac enzymes and/or ECG changes consistent with MI. - Diagnosis of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy due to valvular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, tachycardia, or myocarditis. - Previous treatment for post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction including PCI and thrombolytic therapy. - Documented presence of a known LV thrombus, aortic dissection, or aortic aneurysm. - Documented presence of epicardial stenosis of 70% or greater in one or more major epicardial coronary arteries. - Documented presence of aortic stenosis (aortic stenosis graded as 1.5cm2 or less). - Documented presence of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (echocardiographic assessment of aortic insufficiency graded as =+2). - Evidence of a life-threatening arrhythmia in the absence of a defibrillator (nonsustained ventricular tachycardia = 20 consecutive beats or complete second or third degree heart block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker) or QTc interval > 550 ms on screening ECG. - AICD firing in the past 30 days prior to the procedure - Be eligible for or require coronary artery revascularization. - Diabetic with poorly controlled blood glucose levels and/or evidence of proliferative retinopathy. - Have a hematologic abnormality as evidenced by hematocrit < 25%, white blood cell < 2,500/ul or platelet values < 100,000/ul without another explanation. - Have liver dysfunction, as evidenced by enzymes (ALT and AST) greater than three times the ULN. - Have a coagulopathy condition = (INR > 1.3) not due to a reversible cause. - Known, serious radiographic contrast allergy. - Known allergies to penicillin or streptomycin. - Organ transplant recipient. - Have a history of organ or cell transplant rejection - Clinical history of malignancy within 5 years (i.e., patients with prior malignancy must be disease free for 5 years), except curatively-treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical carcinoma. - Non-cardiac condition that limits lifespan to < 1 year. - On chronic therapy with immunosuppressant medication. - Serum positive for HIV, hepatitis BsAg, or viremic hepatitis C. - Female patient who is pregnant, nursing, or of child-bearing potential and not using effective birth control. - Have a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 24 months. - Be currently participating (or participated within the previous 30 days) in an investigational therapeutic or device trial. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Miami School of Medicine | Miami | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Joshua M Hare | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) |
United States,
Hare JM, DiFede DL, Rieger AC, Florea V, Landin AM, El-Khorazaty J, Khan A, Mushtaq M, Lowery MH, Byrnes JJ, Hendel RC, Cohen MG, Alfonso CE, Valasaki K, Pujol MV, Golpanian S, Ghersin E, Fishman JE, Pattany P, Gomes SA, Delgado C, Miki R, Abuzeid F, Vidro-Casiano M, Premer C, Medina A, Porras V, Hatzistergos KE, Anderson E, Mendizabal A, Mitrani R, Heldman AW. Randomized Comparison of Allogeneic Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: POSEIDON-DCM Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 7;69(5):526-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 14. — View Citation
Trachtenberg B, Velazquez DL, Williams AR, McNiece I, Fishman J, Nguyen K, Rouy D, Altman P, Schwarz R, Mendizabal A, Oskouei B, Byrnes J, Soto V, Tracy M, Zambrano JP, Heldman AW, Hare JM. Rationale and design of the Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Human Cells (bone marrow or mesenchymal) in Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure Secondary to Myocardial Infarction (TAC-HFT) trial: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy. Am Heart J. 2011 Mar;161(3):487-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.024. — View Citation
Williams AR, Trachtenberg B, Velazquez DL, McNiece I, Altman P, Rouy D, Mendizabal AM, Pattany PM, Lopera GA, Fishman J, Zambrano JP, Heldman AW, Hare JM. Intramyocardial stem cell injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: functional recovery and reverse remodeling. Circ Res. 2011 Apr 1;108(7):792-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.242610. Epub 2011 Mar 17. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Incidence of Any Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TE-SAEs) | Incidence of TE-SAEs is defined as the composite of: death, non-fatal MI, stroke, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, sustained ventricular arrhythmias (characterized by ventricular arrhythmias lasting longer than 15 seconds or with hemodynamic compromise), or any other potential late effects detected and corroborated by clinical presentation, laboratory investigations, image analysis and when necessary with biopsy from suspected target sites in the body. | One month post-catheterization | |
Secondary | Measurement of Changes in Peak VO2 | Measurement of Peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2) by treadmill determination during the 12 month follow-up period. | Baseline, 6 month and 12 month | |
Secondary | Measurement of Changes in 6 Minute Walk | Measurement of Six-minute walk test during the 12 month follow-up period | Baseline, 6 month and 12 month | |
Secondary | Measurement of Changes in Global Ejection Fraction | Measurement of regional left ventricular function, end diastolic and end systolic volume, measured by MRI, and or CT, and echocardiogram. | Baseline, 6 month and 12 month | |
Secondary | Measurement of Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) | Measurement of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class during the 12 month follow-up period. | Baseline, 6 month and 12 month | |
Secondary | Measurement of Changes in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire | Measurement of Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire during the 12 month follow-up period. It measures the effects of symptoms, functional limitations, and psychological distress on an individual's quality of life. The response scale for all 21 items on the MLHF is based on a 6-point. The Maximum possible scores being 126 and the minimum 0. Higher scores indicate a worse or worsening quality of life, while lower scores or decreasing scores indicate a better quality of life. | Baseline, 6 month and 12 month |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06055504 -
Study of Personalized Allocation of Defibrillators in Non-ischemic Heart Failure (SPANISH-1)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03249272 -
Microvascular Dysfunction in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Insights From CMR Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05769036 -
Conventional Biventricular Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03797092 -
Stem Cell Therapy in Non-IschEmic Non-treatable Dilated CardiomyopathiEs II: a Pilot Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04476901 -
Administration of Allogeneic-MSC in Patients With Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05760924 -
Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04325594 -
The Application of the Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Complex Treatment of Non-ischemic Heart Failure
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04558723 -
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Guidance of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation in Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
|
N/A |