Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01094457
Other study ID # 825004-5
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received March 26, 2010
Last updated June 13, 2012
Start date March 2009
Est. completion date June 2012

Study information

Verified date June 2012
Source Shenyang Northern Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Ministry of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Clopidogrel resistance (CR) or low-responsiveness is associated with increased risk of ischemic events and can be detected by laboratory tests. This multicenter, randomized study is aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy (i.e. double clopidogrel maintenance dose and/or additional cilostazol)for patients with CR after coronary stenting.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 840
Est. completion date June 2012
Est. primary completion date April 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 35 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criterial:

- aged 35 to 75 years

- acute coronary syndromes

- underwent successful coronary stent implantation

- informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- contraindications to antiplatelet therapy

- history of intracranial bleeding

- known bleeding disorders

- severe liver or kidney disease

- pregnancy

- left main coronary artery disease

- planned non cardiac surgery within 1 year

- end stage of other serious disease with life expectancy less than 1 year

- heart failure with NYHA grade 3 to 4

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
aspirin, clopidogrel
patients in the standard group received standard dual antiplatelet therapy: aspirin 300mg/d for 30 days followed by 100mg/d indefinitely, clopidogrel 75mg/d for at least 1 year
aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol
Firstly,all patients in this group were received aspirin 300mg/d and clopidogrel 150mg/d for 3 days. Then a platelet aggregation function test was performed. The regimen will lasted for another 27 days if patients were judged as responsive to current clopidogrel dose. Patients still with clopidogrel resistance were then randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel 75mg/d plus cilostazol 100mg, twice per day or clopidogrel 150mg/d plus cilostazol 50mg, twice per day for 27 days. At 30-day, a repeat platelet aggregation function test wil performed for all patients. Then a standard dual antiplatelet regimen with aspirin 100mg/d indefinitely and clopidogrel 75mg/d for at least 1 year will be prescribed for all patients.

Locations

Country Name City State
China 463 Hospital of PLA Shenyang Liaoning
China Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang Liaoning
China Shenyang Northern Hospital Shenyang Liaoning

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Shenyang Northern Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Major ischemic cardiovascular events defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or stroke 1 year No
Secondary Stent thrombosis according to ARC definition 1 year Yes
Secondary major adverse cardiac and cerebral events(MACCE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization or stroke 1 year No
Secondary Hemorrhagic events according to TIMI bleeding definition within 1 year Yes
Secondary reduction in ADP induced platelet aggregation assessed by LTA (Packs-4 Aggregometer, Helena labs, Beaumont, Texas) 30 days No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Not yet recruiting NCT05669222 - The FAVOR V AMI Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05240781 - Zotarolimus vs Sirolimus Eluting Stent in High Bleeding Risk N/A
Recruiting NCT03378934 - Anti-platelet Effect of Berberine in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06025071 - Residual Inflammatory Risk-Guided colcHicine in Elderly Trial Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT04043091 - Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction N/A
Completed NCT03085823 - The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
Completed NCT02837744 - Studying Hemostatic Effect of Axiostat® Dressing on Radial Access After Percutaneous Procedure
Completed NCT02044146 - A Pharmacodynamic Study of a Personalized Strategy for P2Y12 Inhibition Versus Ticagrelor in Reducing Ischemic and Bleeding Risk Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03131271 - Effect of Ice Bag Application to Femoral Region on Pain in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N/A
Completed NCT01156571 - A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (CHAMPION PHOENIX) Phase 3
Completed NCT01135667 - Prasugrel Versus Double Dose Clopidogrel to Treat Clopidogrel Low-responsiveness After PCI Phase 4
Unknown status NCT00751491 - Clopidogrel Versus Adenosin in Non Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Phase 3
Completed NCT00725868 - Blood Endothelium Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N/A
Completed NCT03708588 - Chewed Versus Integral Pill of Ticagrelor Phase 4
Completed NCT04163393 - R-One Efficiency For PCI Evolution With Robotic Assistance N/A
Recruiting NCT05554588 - Intrathrombus Thrombolysis Versus Aspiration Thrombectomy During Primary PCI N/A
Recruiting NCT06080919 - Plaque Modification And Impact On Microcirculatory Territory After Drug-Coated Balloon Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PLAMI). N/A
Recruiting NCT05353140 - LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients With AF and PCI N/A