Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01061931
Other study ID # MACPAF
Secondary ID 4-087-08
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 4
First received February 2, 2010
Last updated June 23, 2014
Start date March 2009
Est. completion date November 2011

Study information

Verified date June 2014
Source Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Germany: Ethics Commission
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this prospective randomized single-center trial is to compare efficiency and safety of two pulmonary vein ablation systems in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using the Arctic Front® versus the HD Mesh Ablator® catheter.


Description:

Primary objective:

• Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation defined by achieving an exit block for all pulmonary veins per patient.

Secondary objectives:

- Detecting (silent) cerebral thromboembolism using neuro(psychological) tests and brain MRI prior and within 2 days after PV ablation.

- Detecting (silent) cerebral thromboembolism using neuro(psychological) tests and brain MRI within 6 months after PV ablation.

- Determination of spontaneous recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation using a subcutaneously implanted loop recorder (Reveal XT®).

- Characterization of non-neurological major complications (death, atrial-esophageal fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis, pericardial tamponade)

- Rate of iatrogenic interatrial septal defects after transseptal puncture for PV ablation.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 108
Est. completion date November 2011
Est. primary completion date November 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with ECG-documented symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and at least one ineffective antiarrhythmic drug treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

- Previous ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation or cardiac surgery within 3 months

- Left atrial diameter > 50mm or ejection fraction < 35%

- Instable coronary artery disease or clinically relevant cardiac valve insufficiency

- Hyperthyroidism, pregnancy or lactation; coumadin or heparin intolerance

- Concomitant disease with expected lifespan < 2 years

- Contraindications for MRI or acute cerebral infarction detected by brain MRI immediately (< 24 hours) before catheter ablation.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Arctic Front® catheter vs. HD Mesh Ablator® catheter
Pulmonary vein ablation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using the Arctic Front® catheter versus the HD Mesh Ablator® catheter

Locations

Country Name City State
Germany Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30 Berlin

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Charite University, Berlin, Germany German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation defined by achieving an exit block for all pulmonary veins per patient During ablation procedure No
Secondary Detecting (silent) cerebral thromboembolism using neuro(psychological) tests and brain MRI within 2 days after catheter ablation Yes
Secondary Detecting (silent) cerebral thromboembolism using neuro(psychological) tests and brain MRI 6 months after catheter ablation No
Secondary Determination of spontaneous recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation using a subcutaneously implanted loop recorder (Reveal XT®) 1 year after catheter ablation No
Secondary Characterization of non-neurologic major complications (death, atrial-esophageal fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis, pericardial tamponade) within 1 month after catheter ablation Yes
Secondary Rate of iatrogenic interatrial septal defects after transseptal puncture for left-sided atrial catheter ablation 1 year after catheter ablation Yes