Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00229112
Other study ID # 0826-034
Secondary ID 2005_083
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received September 27, 2005
Last updated February 16, 2017
Start date April 2001
Est. completion date April 2004

Study information

Verified date February 2017
Source Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravenous ertapenem versus another intravenous antibiotic in the treatment of moderate to severe diabetic foot infections.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 400
Est. completion date April 2004
Est. primary completion date April 2004
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus treated with diet or medication

- Clinically or microbiologically documented foot infection below the knee

- Osteomyelitic bone must be removed within 48 hours of study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

- Uncomplicated skin infections

- Infected burn wounds

- Necrotizing fascitis

- Wounds with gangrene that cannot be removed with debridement

- Infections of prosthetic materials

- Foreign materials that can not be removed by surgical debridement

- Patients with another antibiotic 3 days prior to enrollment without evidence of treatment failure and presence of a positive culture

- Insufficient blood flow to the limb requiring a revascularization procedure

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
MK0826, ertapenem sodium / Duration of Treatment - 24 weeks

Comparator: Piperacillin/Tazobactam / Duration of Treatment - 24 weeks


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

References & Publications (5)

Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA, Polis AB, Abramson MA. Does dermal thermometry predict clinical outcome in diabetic foot infection? Analysis of data from the SIDESTEP* trial. Int Wound J. 2006 Dec;3(4):302-7. — View Citation

Citron DM, Goldstein EJ, Merriam CV, Lipsky BA, Abramson MA. Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2819-28. — View Citation

Lipsky BA, Armstrong DG, Citron DM, Tice AD, Morgenstern DE, Abramson MA. Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for diabetic foot infections (SIDESTEP): prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(949 — View Citation

Lipsky BA, Polis AB, Lantz KC, Norquist JM, Abramson MA. The value of a wound score for diabetic foot infections in predicting treatment outcome: a prospective analysis from the SIDESTEP trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):671-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00521.x. — View Citation

Lipsky BA, Sheehan P, Armstrong DG, Tice AD, Polis AB, Abramson MA. Clinical predictors of treatment failure for diabetic foot infections: data from a prospective trial. Int Wound J. 2007 Mar;4(1):30-8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Clinical Cure/Improvement at discontinuation of IV antibiotic therapy.
Secondary Clinical Cure: 1. Day 5 of IV antibiotic therapy; 2.10 days after completion of all antibiotic therapy.