Patients With Spinal Stenosis Indicated for LLIF Clinical Trial
— IDVDOfficial title:
Is Indirect Decompression Sufficient for the Treatment of Central Stenosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
| Verified date | October 2021 |
| Source | Hospital for Special Surgery, New York |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing 1-level lateral lumbar spinal fusion. This study seeks to randomize patients indicated for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) into one of two groups: direct decompression and indirect decompression.
| Status | Withdrawn |
| Enrollment | 0 |
| Est. completion date | September 29, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 29, 2021 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Fusion indicated by the treating surgeon. Fusion may be indicated for one or more of the following reasons: - Mobile degenerative spondylolisthesis - Severe vertical foraminal stenosis - Adjacent segment degeneration and/or degenerative disc disease with suspected discogenic pain - One-level central canal stenosis - WITH neurogenic claudication - As measured in preoperative MRI - Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score > 35% (18/50) - Failed 3 months of conservative treatment - Willing to give written informed consent and psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to comply fully with protocol, including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements, and filling out forms Exclusion Criteria: - Multilevel central canal stenosis - Patients with vertebral endplate dimensions that are too small to allow for safe placement of an intervertebral cage - Known allergy to titanium, polyethylene, cobalt, chromium, or molybdenum - Prior surgery at index disc level (discectomy, decompression, or fusion) - History of spinal or vertebral infection of the lumbar spine - History of vertebral fracture of the lumbar spine - Current pregnancy or interest in becoming pregnant over the next 1 year - Active infection-systemic or local - Non-English speakers |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Hospital for Special Surgery | New York | New York |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Hospital for Special Surgery, New York |
United States,
Baird EO, McAnany SJ, Overley S, Skovrlj B, Guzman JZ, Qureshi SA. Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Does Training Level Matter? Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E748-E753. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000274. — View Citation
Boukebir MA, Berlin CD, Navarro-Ramirez R, Heiland T, Schöller K, Rawanduzy C, Kirnaz S, Jada A, Härtl R. Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Spine Lumbar Decompression and Dural Repair Through Tubular Retractors. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Apr 1;13(2):232-245. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001407. — View Citation
Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. — View Citation
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. Review. — View Citation
Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B, Kimura H, Takemoto M, Matsuda S. Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E175-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000703. — View Citation
Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray J, Dargie H. A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1208-17. — View Citation
Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1:S17-24. Epub 2005 Dec 1. Review. — View Citation
Houten JK, Nasser R, Baxi N. Clinical assessment of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using theO-arm multidimensional surgical imaging system. Neurosurgery. 2012 Apr;70(4):990-5. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318237a829. — View Citation
Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, Spiker R, Brodke D. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.00000 — View Citation
Huntsman KT, Riggleman JR, Ahrendtsen LA, Ledonio CG. Navigated robot-guided pedicle screws placed successfully in single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):643-647. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01034-w. Epub 2019 Oct 17. — View Citation
Isaacs RE, Sembrano JN, Tohmeh AG; SOLAS Degenerative Study Group. Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II: Radiographic Findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S133-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001472. — View Citation
Jain D, Manning J, Lord E, Protopsaltis T, Kim Y, Buckland AJ, Bendo J, Fischer C, Goldstein J. Initial Single-Institution Experience With a Novel Robotic-Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw and Pelvic Screw Placement With 643 Screws. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Oct 31;13(5):459-463. doi: 10.14444/6060. eCollection 2019 Oct. — View Citation
Kono Y, Gen H, Sakuma Y, Koshika Y. Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2018 Apr;12(2):356-364. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.356. Epub 2018 Apr 16. — View Citation
Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Satake K, Ishikawa Y, Ouchida J, Segi N, Yamaguchi H, Imagama S. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1411-E1418. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003180. — View Citation
Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):435-43. — View Citation
Pimenta L. Less-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) surgical technique: video lecture. Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:441-2. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3948-4. — View Citation
Sellin JN, Mayer RR, Hoffman M, Ropper AE. Simultaneous lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screws (SLIPS) with CT-guided navigation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;175:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 23. — View Citation
Sembrano JN, Tohmeh A, Isaacs R; SOLAS Degenerative Study Group. Two-year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part I: Clinical Findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 201 — View Citation
Smith ZA, Sugimoto K, Lawton CD, Fessler RG. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):358-63. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826226cb. — View Citation
* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 100 point scale. The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools [1]. For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated by adding all scores for each statement, divided by 50 total possible points, and then multiplied by 100 for a percentage. Percentage scores are interpreted on a scale from 0-20% as minimal disability to 61-100% as crippled. |
Up to 12 months post-operatively | |
| Primary | Comparison of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | Compare ODI scores to assess the kinetics of improvement in the control (direct decompression) vs. treatment (indirect decompression) groups. The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools [1]. For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated by adding all scores for each statement, divided by 50 total possible points, and then multiplied by 100 for a percentage. Percentage scores are interpreted on a scale from 0-20% as minimal disability to 61-100% as crippled. |
Up to 24 months post-operatively. (6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months timepoints) | |
| Secondary | Reoperation Rate | Reoperation rate on the lumbar spine within 12 months and within 24 months | Within 12 months and 24 months, post-operatively. | |
| Secondary | Complication Rate | Complication rate within 12 months and within 24 months | Within 12 months and 24 months, post-operatively. | |
| Secondary | Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)-Back and Leg pain | Patient Reported Outcomes: Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)-back and leg pain scores | 6- Weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-Months. | |
| Secondary | Radiographic Measurements - Lumbar Lordosis | Radiographic measurements at 12 months will be compared to preoperative measurements to quantify the change in lumbar lordosis as a result of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF). Measurements will be taken in millimeters by (2) co-investigators. | Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs | |
| Secondary | Radiographic Measurements - Segmental Lordosis | Radiographic measurements at 12 months will be compared to preoperative measurements to quantify the change in segmental lordosis as a result of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF). Measurements will be taken in millimeters by (2) co-investigators. | Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs | |
| Secondary | Radiographic Measurements - Disc Space Height | Radiographic measurements at 12 months will be compared to preoperative measurements to quantify the change in disc space height as a result of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF). Measurements will be taken in millimeters by (2) co-investigators. | Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs |