Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04601662
Other study ID # UDDS-Ortho-06-2020
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 15, 2017
Est. completion date February 15, 2019

Study information

Verified date October 2020
Source Damascus University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The duration of orthodontic treatment is one of the exacerbation causes of orthodontic pain. Several methods have been suggested to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment classified to surgical and non-surgical methods. Researchers used minimally invasive surgical methods like corticision, piezocision, micro-osteoperforation, and piezopuncture indicated that most of these methods can accelerate dental movement by 20 - 40%. The effect of corticision as a minimally invasive procedure on root resorption and dehiscence formation during orthodontic tooth movement has not been studied yet. Applying corticision on the lower anterior teeth using a surgical blade and a hammer may accelerate tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment. This study consists of two groups, patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups.


Description:

Orthodontically induced external root resorption accompanying orthodontic treatment is defined as a microscopic loss of root tissue as a result of the inflammatory reaction that occurs in the area of application of orthodontic force. It can be diagnosed and measured using conventional radiography or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Dehiscence is a loss of alveolar bone on the facial (rarely lingual) aspect of a tooth that leaves a characteristic v-shaped, root-exposed defect from the cementoenamel junction apically. Bone dehiscence cannot be detected through conventional radiography or clinical examination. Actually, CBCT can be considered the best accessible technique providing 3D data. Corticision is one of the minimally invasive surgical procedures that is not associated with flap lifting. It was used to accelerate tooth movement in animals and case report studies. Its application on humans may aggravate their fear and anxiety towards the pain that may accompany this technique. No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared flapless corticision in the non-extraction-based orthodontic decrowding of lower anterior teeth (LAT) with the conventional treatment in terms of external apical root resorption (EARR) and dehiscence formation (DF).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date February 15, 2019
Est. primary completion date November 15, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 24 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age range between 18 and 24 years 2. Completion permanent dentition (except third molars) 3. Mild to moderate crowding (2-6 mm according to Little's index) 4. Absence of medications intake that interferes with pain perception for at least one week before the beginning of the treatment Exclusion Criteria: 1. Medical conditions that would affect tooth movement. 2. Cases which contraindication to oral surgery. 3. Previous orthodontic treatments.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Corticision
A special instrument will be used to cut the cortex of the alveolar bone at different locations between the lower anterior teeth
Other:
Traditional Non-accelerated Treatment
The normal sequence of treatment steps will be followed in this group without using any kind of acceleration methods

Locations

Country Name City State
Syrian Arab Republic Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School Damascus

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Damascus University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Syrian Arab Republic, 

References & Publications (5)

Charavet C, Lambert F, Lecloux G, Le Gall M. [Accelerated orthodontic treatment using corticotomies: what are the minimally invasive alternatives?]. Orthod Fr. 2019 Mar;90(1):5-12. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2019002. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Review. French. — View Citation

Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, Lambert F. Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication for Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):1003-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034516645066. Epub 2016 Apr 29. — View Citation

Makedonas D, Lund H, Hansen K. Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months and at the end of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):389-93. doi: 10.2319/042012-332.1. Epub 2012 Oct 23. — View Citation

Mandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Interdisciplinary Dentofacial Therapy: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review Focusing on Risk Assessment of the Dentoalveolar Bone Changes Influenced by Tooth Movement. J Periodontol. 2017 Oct;88(10):960-977. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.160781. Review. — View Citation

Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA. Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):67-79. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy027. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Root Length Cone-beam computed tomography imaging will be used for the lower jaw. Root length will be measured for each root of the six lower anterior teeth The change will be calculated between 'before' and 'after' images in mm. T1: one day before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, T2: exactly at 12 months following the onset of orthodontic treatment
Secondary Change in Dehiscence Proportion Cone-beam computed tomography imaging will be used for the lower jaw. Any V-shaped bone defect located buccally or lingually in the lower anterior region involving bone margin is preliminarily identified as dehiscence. This is going to be measured and the proportion of the presence of such defects will be calculated on two different occasions (T1 and T2). T1: one day before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, T2: exactly at 12 months following the onset of orthodontic treatment
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT05676840 - Comparing the Alignment Efficiency of Three Types of Nickel-titanium Archwires N/A
Recruiting NCT04815200 - Efficiency of Using Copper-Nickel-Titanium Versus Nickel-Titanium Arch Wires on Anterior Segment Crowding Alleviation in Group of Adults With Moderate Crowding N/A
Completed NCT06401369 - Comparing Labial and Lingual Orthodontic Appliances on Root Resorption and Bone Height N/A
Completed NCT06401382 - Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Between Two Different Types of Orthodontic Appliances N/A
Recruiting NCT04940351 - Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Piezocision and Micro-osteoperforation in Alleviating Mandibular Anterior Crowding N/A
Recruiting NCT05492773 - Evaluating the Efficacy of Micro-Osteoperforations Technique on the Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration in Moderate Mandibular Anterior Crowding Cases Treated With Clear Aligners N/A
Recruiting NCT03256279 - Mechanical Properties and Clinical Efficacy of Two Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Archwires N/A
Completed NCT04988373 - Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults. N/A
Completed NCT06337435 - Using Multi-looped Lingual Retainer to Relief Anterior Mandibular Crowding
Completed NCT04728464 - Pain, Acceptance, and Discomfort With Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO)
Completed NCT05510206 - SmartArch vs Super Elastic NiTi Aligning Archwires N/A