Comparing Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Aflibercept Combined With Reduced Fluence PDT in PCV Treatment

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Clinical Trial

Official title: A Multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Aflibercept Combined With Reduced Fluence PDT for the Treatment of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Status Active, not recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an individualized dosing schedule comprising Aflibercept and RF-PDT in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The primary objective is to compare the polyp closure rate at week 12 between the 2 treatment groups. The secondary aims include comparing visual, anatomical, treatment burden and clinical biomarkers between each treatment group.

Clinical Trial Description

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In its exudative or wet form, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) causes an exudative maculopathy resulting in sudden loss of vision with severe effects on patients' quality of life. Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (anti-VEGF) have become the mainstay of treatment for AMD CNV and has been shown to have favorable outcomes in most AMD CNV subtypes. In the Asian population, however, a particular subtype called polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), which affects about 50% of exudative maculopathy, has been shown to have less favorable response to anti-VEGF therapy.

The best treatment option for PCV has remained unclear. Current best evidence is from 2 recent randomized controlled trials, the EVEREST II trial which compares the efficacy of ranibizumab with or without photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment of PCV and the PLANET trial which compares Aflibercept monotherapy against a rescue PDT when Aflibercept is deemed ineffective. Both trials have reported significant improvement in visual outcomes, however there remain significant unanswered questions and unmet needs regarding the use of Aflibercept and PDT as the best treatment for PCV.

In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of combination Aflibercept with RF-PDT (at baseline) and Aflibercept monotherapy. This particular strategy has not been studies before and represents the amalgamation of unanswered questions from the best evidence to date for the treatment of PCV. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
• Vascular Diseases

• NCT number: NCT03941587
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Singapore National Eye Centre
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 1, 2021
• Completion date: July 31, 2024