Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03805854
Other study ID # 01/2019
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 15, 2019
Est. completion date October 23, 2019

Study information

Verified date June 2020
Source Technische Universität München
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Pain is a highly complex and subjective phenomenon which results from the dynamic integration of sensory and contextual (i.e. cognitive, emotional, and motivational) processes. Recent evidence suggests that neural oscillations and their synchronization between different brain areas might form the basis of these integrative functions. When investigating tonic experimental pain lasting for several minutes, for example, objective stimulus intensity is inversely related to alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) oscillations in early somatosensory areas, while subjective pain intensity is positively associated with gamma (30-100 Hz) oscillations in prefrontal cortex. Yet, with a few exemptions, reported links between oscillatory brain activity and pain have mostly been established by correlative approaches which do not allow to infer causality. The current project aims at comprehensively investigating the causal role of neural oscillations for tonic experimental pain in healthy human subjects. To this end, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be employed to modulate oscillatory brain activity in alpha and gamma frequency bands and investigate effects of this manipulation on pain perception and pain-related autonomic responses. Using an established tonic pain stimulation protocol and a double-blind, sham-controlled design, effects of tACS of somatosensory as well as prefrontal brain areas will be investigated. Results promise to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying tonic experimental pain by testing the mechanistic role of neural oscillations in different aspects of pain processing. Furthermore, they might contribute to the development of urgently needed new treatment approaches for chronic pain using neuromodulatory methods.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 39
Est. completion date October 23, 2019
Est. primary completion date October 23, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- aged 18-65 years

- Right-handedness

- Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnancy

- Neurological or psychiatric diseases (e.g. epilepsy, stroke, depression, anxiety disorders)

- Severe general illnesses (e.g. tumors, diabetes)

- Skin diseases (e.g. dermatitis, psoriasis or eczema)

- Current or recurrent pain

- Regular intake of medication

- Surgical procedures involving the head or spinal cord

- Head trauma followed by impairment of consciousness

- Past fainting spells or syncopes

- Metal (except titanium) or electronic implants

- Side-effects following previous electrical or magnetic stimulation

- Side-effects following previous thermal stimulation

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Experimental Pain in Healthy Human Subjects

Intervention

Device:
10 Hz tACS of the bilateral somatosensory cortex
10 Hz tACS at 1 mA will be applied over the bilateral somatosensory cortex for 10 minutes using a Neuroconn stimulator (DC-Stimulator MR; Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany) and 2 5*5 cm rubber electrodes placed at electrode positions CP3 and CP4 according to the international 10-20 system.
10 Hz tACS of the prefrontal cortex
10 Hz tACS at 1 mA will be applied over the prefrontal cortex for 10 minutes using a Neuroconn stimulator (DC-Stimulator MR; Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany) and 2 5*5 cm rubber electrodes placed at electrode positions F3 and F4 according to the international 10-20 system.
80 Hz tACS of the bilateral somatosensory cortex
80 Hz tACS at 1 mA will be applied over the bilateral somatosensory cortex for 10 minutes using a Neuroconn stimulator (DC-Stimulator MR; Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany) and 2 5*5 cm rubber electrodes placed at electrode positions CP3 and CP4 according to the international 10-20 system.
80 Hz tACS of the prefrontal cortex
80 Hz tACS at 1 mA will be applied over the prefrontal cortex for 10 minutes using a Neuroconn stimulator (DC-Stimulator MR; Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany) and 2 5*5 cm rubber electrodes placed at electrode positions F3 and F4 according to the international 10-20 system.
Sham stimulation of the bilateral somatosensory cortex
10 Hz tACS at 1 mA will be applied over the bilateral somatosensory cortex for 10 seconds at the beginning of the experimental session using a Neuroconn stimulator (DC-Stimulator MR; Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany) and 2 5*5 cm rubber electrodes placed at electrode positions CP3 and CP4 according to the international 10-20 system.
Sham stimulation of the prefrontal cortex
10 Hz tACS at 1 mA will be applied over the prefrontal cortex for 10 seconds at the beginning of the experimental session using a Neuroconn stimulator (DC-Stimulator MR; Neuroconn, Ilmenau, Germany) and 2 5*5 cm rubber placed at electrode positions F3 and F4 according to the international 10-20 system.

Locations

Country Name City State
Germany Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München Munich Bavaria

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Technische Universität München German Research Foundation

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (11)

Ahn S, Prim JH, Alexander ML, McCulloch KL, Fröhlich F. Identifying and Engaging Neuronal Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. J Pain. 2019 Mar;20(3):277.e1-277.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 27. — View Citation

Arendsen LJ, Hugh-Jones S, Lloyd DM. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency Reduces Pain When the Intensity of Pain is Uncertain. J Pain. 2018 Jul;19(7):807-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 15. — View Citation

Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Strüber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:279. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279. eCollection 2013. — View Citation

Jensen MP, Day MA, Miró J. Neuromodulatory treatments for chronic pain: efficacy and mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Mar;10(3):167-78. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.12. Epub 2014 Feb 18. Review. — View Citation

Nickel MM, May ES, Tiemann L, Postorino M, Ta Dinh S, Ploner M. Autonomic responses to tonic pain are more closely related to stimulus intensity than to pain intensity. Pain. 2017 Nov;158(11):2129-2136. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001010. — View Citation

Nickel MM, May ES, Tiemann L, Schmidt P, Postorino M, Ta Dinh S, Gross J, Ploner M. Brain oscillations differentially encode noxious stimulus intensity and pain intensity. Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 7. — View Citation

Ploner M, Sorg C, Gross J. Brain Rhythms of Pain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):100-110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Review. — View Citation

Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci. 2018 Feb;21(2):174-187. doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4. Epub 2018 Jan 8. Review. — View Citation

Schulz E, May ES, Postorino M, Tiemann L, Nickel MM, Witkovsky V, Schmidt P, Gross J, Ploner M. Prefrontal Gamma Oscillations Encode Tonic Pain in Humans. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov;25(11):4407-14. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv043. Epub 2015 Mar 8. — View Citation

Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, Weiskopf N, Blefari ML, Rana M, Oblak E, Birbaumer N, Sulzer J. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):86-100. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164. Epub 2016 Dec 22. Review. Erratum in: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 May;20(5):314. — View Citation

Vosskuhl J, Strüber D, Herrmann CS. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Brain Oscillations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 May 25;12:211. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00211. eCollection 2018. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Changes in pain rating on visual analogue scale (VAS; 0: 'no pain' to 10: 'maximal tolerable pain') between sessions During thermal stimulation, participants will be instructed to continuously rate the currently perceived pain intensity using a finger-span device. During 10 min thermal stimulation in each of six interventions (10 Hz tACS/80 Hz tACS/sham stimulation of the somatosensory/prefrontal cortex), which are separated by at least 24 hrs.
Primary Changes in skin conductance responses (µS) between sessions Skin conductance responses will be recorded using two electrodes attached to the index and middle finger of the left hand. During 10 min thermal stimulation in each of six interventions (10 Hz tACS/80 Hz tACS/sham stimulation of the somatosensory/prefrontal cortex), which are separated by at least 24 hrs.
Primary Changes in heart rate (BPM, beats per minute) between sessions The electrocardiogram (ECG) will be recorded using two electrodes placed under the right clavicle and below the sternum, respectively. During 10 min thermal stimulation in each of six interventions (10 Hz tACS/80 Hz tACS/sham stimulation of the somatosensory/prefrontal cortex), which are separated by at least 24 hrs.
Primary Changes in oscillatory brain activity before and after tACS application within each session 5-minute resting state electroencephalogram (EEG) will be recorded with two electrodes placed at the same electrode positions used for the respective tACS protocol. Power of oscillatory brain activity will be quantified in the alpha (8-12 Hz) and gamma (30-100 Hz) bands. Measured immediately before and after the tACS protocol in each of six interventions (10 Hz tACS/80 Hz tACS/sham stimulation of the somatosensory/prefrontal cortex), which are separated by at least 24 hrs.
Secondary Perception of tACS induced visual and skin sensations measured by numerical rating scale (NRS; 0: 'no sensation' to 10: 'very strong sensation') The perception of visual and skin sensations induced by the tACS protocols will be assessed using a custom questionnaire. Measured immediately after the EEG measurement following each of six interventions (10 Hz tACS/80 Hz tACS/sham stimulation of the somatosensory/prefrontal cortex), which are separated by at least 24 hrs.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05570695 - How do Alpha Oscillations Shape the Perception of Pain? - An EEG-based Neurofeedback Study N/A
Completed NCT05616091 - Intra- and Inter-individual Differences of Pain N/A