Clinical Comparison of Femoral Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block Following Anterior Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Clinical Trial

— FNB vs ACB  

Official title:

Clinical Outcome Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery (COFAKS)-Addendum

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03704376
• Other study ID #: HSC-MH-14-0734 (addendum)
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: February 1, 2016
• Est. completion date: November 16, 2017

Study information

• Verified date: September 2021
• Source: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will examine the potential differences between femoral nerve blockade (FNB) and adductor canal blockade (ACB) for pain control and quadriceps muscle activation for patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Description:

Adequate pain control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) often requires a regional nerve block. The femoral nerve block (FNB) has been traditionally employed. More recently, ultrasound application to regional nerve blocks allows for the use of alternatives such as the adductor canal block following ACL reconstruction. In 2009, Manickam et al. were the first to describe the ultrasound guided adductor canal technique for the purposes of knee joint analgesia. Unlike other traditional techniques that seek to cause a sensory as well as a motor blockade, the adductor canal block attempts to spare the motor block of the neighboring distributions in an attempt to offer selective analgesia and strength preservation. Chisholm et al demonstrated the adductor canal block provides similar and adequate postoperative analgesia when compared to the FNB, following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Their study focused on analgesia and did not evaluate quadriceps function or impact on rehabilitation. Sharma et al drew the first association between femoral nerve blocks and increased fall risk due to muscle weakness in total knee arthroplasty population. A randomized, blinded study to compare quadriceps strength following adductor canal versus FNB was performed by Kwofie et al. They showed that compared with FNB, adductor canal block results in significant quadriceps motor sparing and significantly preserved balance. These studies focused on acute muscle weakness after regional anesthesia and its relation to safety. Quadriceps function is very important in rehabilitation of ACL reconstruction. Luo et al demonstrated long term deficits related to FNB. They demonstrated that patients treated with FNB after ACL reconstruction had significant isokinetic deficits in knee extension and flexion strength at 6 months when compared with patients who did not receive a nerve block. Patients without a block were 4 times more likely to meet criteria for clearance to return to sports at 6 months. In addition, Krych et al found significantly inferior quadriceps strength and function at 6 months in FNB group. Based on the available literature, we aim to compare femoral nerve versus adductor canal block in regards to pain control and muscle strength in ACL reconstruction patients until return to sport.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 125
• Est. completion date: November 16, 2017
• Est. primary completion date: November 16, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 16 Years to 30 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Males & Females ages 16-30 yrs
• Undergoing ACL reconstruction by Co-Investigator (Walter Lowe)
• Receiving peri-operative FNB or ACB

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not enrolled within the COFAKS study
• Receiving intrathecal nerve blockade or no blockade

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
• Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Intervention

Drug:
• 30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine

• 15 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine

• 100 mcg clonidine

Device:
• High-frequency linear ultrasound transducer

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	The University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston	Houston	Texas

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston	Memorial Hermann Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)	Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.	Post-operative day 1
Primary	Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)	Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.	Post-operative day 14
Primary	Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)	Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.	4 weeks post operative
Secondary	Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test	The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.	Post-operative day 1
Secondary	Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test	The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.	Post-operative day 14
Secondary	Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test	The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.	4 weeks post operative
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, 0 being the better outcome.	1 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	2 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better	3 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	4 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	5 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	6 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	7 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	8 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	9 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	10 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	11 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.	12 hr post surgery
Secondary	Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale	The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better	Postoperative physicians visit
Secondary	Narcotics Use as Assessed by Morphine Equivalents Consumed	morphine equivalents consumed during the entire post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visit post surgery will be obtained from the All-scripts electronic medical record (EMR) system.	Entire post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visit post surgery, PACU range 1 hr to 12 hrs post surgery