Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Clinical Trial
— ACCELERATIONOfficial title:
Adenosine Contrast CorrELations in Evaluating RevAscularizaTION
Verified date | March 2024 |
Source | Duke University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to compare FFR measurements done with adenosine to FFR measurements done with contrast, where the contrast is injected using the ACIST CVi automated contrast injector. The ACCELERATION study will support a safer approach to FFR for patients by potentially reducing toxic drug exposure (adenosine). The 2 main objectives of the study are: 1. Perform a methods comparison between cFFR and the reference standard aFFR, where cFFR is performed using an automated injector with a standardized volume and rate of delivery of contrast with known osmolality. 2. Evaluate the association between final post-PCI FFR and long-term clinical outcomes. The long-term clinical outcomes will include TVR and composite MACE (death, MI, and TVR) at 30 days and 1 year.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 201 |
Est. completion date | April 4, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | May 4, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent or have a legally authorized representative (LAR) that can understand and sign an informed consent prior to initial arteriotomy access 2. Age > 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent 3. Clinically stable and undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization for appropriate indications 4. Willing to be contacted by telephone at 30 days (if no standard of care visit) and at 1 year with chart review for events. 5. Target vessel with an intermediate lesion of 40-70% stenosis by angiographic assessment (a visual estimation by the operator). Serial lesions, diffuse disease, or ostial lesions ("all-comer" lesions) are acceptable if the operator would normally perform FFR and proceed with PCI (or other revascularization) if positive. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Any condition associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year 2. Participation in another clinical study using an investigational agent or device within the past 3 months 3. Ejection fraction = 35% 4. Creatinine = 2 5. Severe valvular heart disease 6. Decompensated acute diastolic or systolic heart failure 7. Bronchospastic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other intolerance to adenosine 8. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction culprit lesion or lesions with any thrombus burden after diagnostic angiography 9. Lesions with severe calcification after diagnostic angiography 10. Lesions in a target vessel supplied by a patent graft |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Mercy Hospital | Coon Rapids | Minnesota |
United States | Durham VA | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Long Beach VA | Long Beach | California |
United States | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Vanderbilt | Nashville | Tennessee |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Duke University | Acist Medical Systems |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Comparison Between Contrast Fractional Flow Reserves (cFFR) and Adenosine Fractional Flow Reserves (aFFR) | FFR is the ratio between the maximal myocardial flow measured in a diseased coronary artery and the theoretical maximal blood flow in the same territory in the absence of the stenosis, measured using adenosine induced hyperemia (aFFR) or contrast induced hyperemia (cFFR). Contrast FFR is being compared to the gold-standard adenosine FFR. An aFFR equal or less than 0.80 is the gold-standard cut-off to benefit from intervention. Reported as the percentage of agreement between aFFR and cFFR. | Baseline | |
Primary | Qualitative Method Comparison Between Contrast Fractional Flow Reserves and Adenosine Fractional Flow Reserves | The qualitative method comparison assesses the agreement as to which lesion is flow limiting. The contrast FFR measurement that corresponds to adenosine FFR measurement value of 0.8 will be used as the cutoff value for determining whether a lesion is flow limiting for contrast FFR. Reported as the percentage of agreement between aFFR and cFFR. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Assessment of the Relationship Between Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserves and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes | assesses whether there is a relationship between final PCI FFR (resting, dPR, cFFR, aFFR) and long-term outcomes (death, MI, TVR). The model will include the known covariates for predicting revascularization outcomes: stent length, vessel diameter, diabetes, history of cardiovascular disease, and multi-vessel disease. | 1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05669222 -
The FAVOR V AMI Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05240781 -
Zotarolimus vs Sirolimus Eluting Stent in High Bleeding Risk
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03378934 -
Anti-platelet Effect of Berberine in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06025071 -
Residual Inflammatory Risk-Guided colcHicine in Elderly Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04043091 -
Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03085823 -
The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT02837744 -
Studying Hemostatic Effect of Axiostat® Dressing on Radial Access After Percutaneous Procedure
|
||
Completed |
NCT02044146 -
A Pharmacodynamic Study of a Personalized Strategy for P2Y12 Inhibition Versus Ticagrelor in Reducing Ischemic and Bleeding Risk
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03131271 -
Effect of Ice Bag Application to Femoral Region on Pain in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01156571 -
A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (CHAMPION PHOENIX)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01135667 -
Prasugrel Versus Double Dose Clopidogrel to Treat Clopidogrel Low-responsiveness After PCI
|
Phase 4 | |
Unknown status |
NCT00751491 -
Clopidogrel Versus Adenosin in Non Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00725868 -
Blood Endothelium Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03708588 -
Chewed Versus Integral Pill of Ticagrelor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04163393 -
R-One Efficiency For PCI Evolution With Robotic Assistance
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05554588 -
Intrathrombus Thrombolysis Versus Aspiration Thrombectomy During Primary PCI
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06080919 -
Plaque Modification And Impact On Microcirculatory Territory After Drug-Coated Balloon Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PLAMI).
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05353140 -
LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients With AF and PCI
|
N/A |