Reverse Shoulder Replacement: Formal vs. Home Physiotherapy

Shoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions Clinical Trial

Official title:

Supervised Physiotherapy Versus a Home Exercise Program After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03430167
• Other study ID #: 201703024
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 29, 2018
• Est. completion date: January 12, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: March 2023
• Source: Washington University School of Medicine
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare range of motion between a structured home exercise program to supervised physiotherapy post-operatively after Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement is performed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy/massive cuff tear through a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Description:

All patients who are evaluated by one of three Shoulder/Elbow Fellowship-trained surgeons at Washington University Department of Orthopedic Surgery and who meet the inclusion criteria will be offered enrollment in the study. Following consent the participant will be asked to undergo an exam of the shoulder and complete questionnaires related to shoulder pain and function. Demographic information, health history related to the affected shoulder, and co-morbidity data will also be collected preoperatively. Patients will be randomized to either a simple, standardized home exercise program or a supervised physiotherapy program administered by a physical therapist after undergoing a standardized operative protocol for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Post-operative range of motion will be measured in a blinded fashion at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. A blinded observer will simultaneously measure validated functional outcomes scores including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score and Visual Analogue Score for pain pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 90
• Est. completion date: January 12, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: January 12, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 61 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Primary RTSA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) or irreparable rotator cuff tear.

2. A pre-operative plan for RTSA

3. Age >60

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Active infection

2. Incompetent deltoid muscle

3. Unwillingness or inability to participate in a home exercise program

4. Medically unfit for operative intervention

5. Revision RTSA

6. RTSA for glenohumeral osteoarthritis or proximal humerus fracture

7. Unwillingness to participate in the study

8. Inability to read or comprehend written instructions

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Joint Diseases
• Shoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions

Intervention

Other:
• home therapy
Patients will be given a set of instructions for completing home therapy for range of motion and strengthening
• formal therapy
Patients will be sent to physical therapist for formal treatment to regain range of motion and strengthening exercises

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Utah - Orthopedics	Salt Lake City	Utah

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Washington University School of Medicine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (23)

Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):535-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22450. — View Citation

Chalmers PN, Slikker W 3rd, Mall NA, Gupta AK, Rahman Z, Enriquez D, Nicholson GP. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Sep 27. — View Citation

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. — View Citation

Charlson ME, Sax FL, MacKenzie CR, Braham RL, Fields SD, Douglas RG Jr. Morbidity during hospitalization: can we predict it? J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(7):705-12. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90107-x. — View Citation

Cvetanovich GL, Chalmers PN, Streit JJ, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty on the Dominant Extremity Attain Greater Postoperative ROM. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3221-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4400-0. Epub 2015 Jun 12. — View Citation

Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D. Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2469-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y. — View Citation

Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1697-705. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02813. — View Citation

Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1742-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00851. — View Citation

Hattrup SJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Reverse shoulder replacement for patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 30. — View Citation

Kappe T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Elsharkawi M. Reliability of radiologic classification for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jun;20(4):543-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 30. — View Citation

Kiet TK, Feeley BT, Naimark M, Gajiu T, Hall SL, Chung TT, Ma CB. Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Sep 9. — View Citation

Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2249-54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994. — View Citation

Lawrence TM, Ahmadi S, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Patient reported activities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: part II. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 Feb 22. — View Citation

Levy JC, Badman B. Reverse shoulder prosthesis for acute four-part fracture: tuberosity fixation using a horseshoe graft. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 May;25(5):318-24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f22088. — View Citation

Levy JC, Everding NG, Gil CC Jr, Stephens S, Giveans MR. Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1872-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 26. — View Citation

Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2544-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00912. — View Citation

Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Oct 29. — View Citation

Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024. — View Citation

Steen BM, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Hussey MM, Cusick MC, Kumar AG, Frankle MA. Outcome and value of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a matched cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 11. — View Citation

Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Sep;14(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90232-2. — View Citation

Wall B, Nove-Josserand L, O'Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1476-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00666. — View Citation

Young AA, Smith MM, Bacle G, Moraga C, Walch G. Early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1915-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00300. — View Citation

Young SW, Zhu M, Walker CG, Poon PC. Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of cuff-tear arthropathy: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15;95(10):910-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00302. — View Citation

* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Range of Motion Outcomes	Compare change in shoulder range of motion after supervised physiotherapy versus a structured home exercise program after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.	Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
Secondary	Clinical Outcome Scores - Quality of Life	Compare change in The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS) after supervised physiotherapy versus a structured home exercise program after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.; The WOOS includes 19 items (0-100 visual analog scale) which assess 1. pain and physical symptoms 2. sports, recreation, and work 3. lifestyle function, and 4. emotional function. A higher score represents a worse outcome.	Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
Secondary	Clinical Outcome Scores - Functional	Compare change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) after supervised physiotherapy versus a structured home exercise program after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.; The ASES includes 1 pain item (0-100 visual analog scale) and 10 items which assess functional status (0=Unable to do, 1=Very difficult to do, 2=Somewhat difficult, 3=Not difficult). A higher score represents a better outcome.	Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 2 months and 24 months post-operatively
Secondary	Clinical Outcome Scores - Pain	Compare change in Visual Analogue Pain Score (0-100) after supervised physiotherapy versus a structured home exercise program after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.	Baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively