Normal Subjects Who Agree to Participate in Taste Testing Clinical Trial
Official title:
Influence of Food Liking of Adding Spices to Replace Dietary Sugar Using Sequential Monadic CLT Methodology
| Verified date | March 2018 |
| Source | University of Colorado, Denver |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This study aims to reduce the amount of sugar in a particular food item and add spices to see if the food liking of that item rates as high or higher in a post meal survey. Through taste testing of the menu items (using sequential monadic CLT methodology) the investigators will determine an opinion of the participants. Results of these surveys will determine whether participants enjoy the reduced sugar options as much as their full sugar counterparts.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 150 |
| Est. completion date | December 9, 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | December 9, 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: -ages 18-65 Exclusion Criteria: - diagnosed taste or sensory disorder - known eating disorder - allergies to test food/ingredients - medical conditions that may adversely affect taste (ie: dysgeusia) - inability to complete protocol or to participate in all three taste testing sessions - personal dietary restrictions towards test items - dislike of the particular food items to be served in taste tests - subjects who do not consume foods or beverages that contain sugar or to which they have added sugar will be excluded - subjects who have not consumed or would not be willing to consume hot tea, oatmeal or baked apple products will be excluded - subjects who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant will be excluded |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Colorado, Denver | McCormick Science Institute |
Essed NH, Kleikers S, van Staveren WA, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. No effect on intake and liking of soup enhanced with mono-sodium glutamate and celery powder among elderly people with olfactory and/or gustatory loss. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60 Suppl 5:143-54. doi: 10.1080/09637480802710216. Epub 2009 May 21. — View Citation
Howard BV, Wylie-Rosett J. Sugar and cardiovascular disease: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Nutrition of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jul 23;106(4):523-7. Erratum in: Circulation. 2003 Apr 29;107(16)2166. — View Citation
Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang DH, Gersch MS, Benner S, Sánchez-Lozada LG. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):899-906. Review. — View Citation
King, SC, Snow, J, Meiselman, HL, Sainsbury, J, Carr, BT, McCafferty, D, Serrano, D, Gillette, M, Millard, L, Li, Q. Development of a questionnaire to measure consumer wellness associated with foods; The WellSense Profile. Food Quality and Preference 39: 82-94, 2014.
Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Erdman JW Jr, Kris-Etherton P, Goldberg IJ, Kotchen TA, Lichtenstein AH, Mitch WE, Mullis R, Robinson K, Wylie-Rosett J, St Jeor S, Suttie J, Tribble DL, Bazzarre TL. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000 Oct 31;102(18):2284-99. — View Citation
Littell, RC, Miliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD, Schabenberger, O (eds.). SAS for Mixed Models, Second edn. Car, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2006.
Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010 Mar 23;121(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. Review. — View Citation
McGuire S. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011. Adv Nutr. 2011 May;2(3):293-4. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000430. Epub 2011 Apr 30. — View Citation
Peters JC, Marker R, Pan Z, Breen JA, Hill JO. The Influence of Adding Spices to Reduced Sugar Foods on Overall Liking. J Food Sci. 2018 Mar;83(3):814-821. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14069. Epub 2018 Feb 24. — View Citation
Peters JC, Polsky S, Stark R, Zhaoxing P, Hill JO. The influence of herbs and spices on overall liking of reduced fat food. Appetite. 2014 Aug;79:183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Apr 24. — View Citation
Polsky S, Beck J, Stark RA, Pan Z, Hill JO, Peters JC. The influence of herbs, spices, and regular sausage and chicken consumption on liking of reduced fat breakfast and lunch items. J Food Sci. 2014 Oct;79(10):S2117-26. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12643. Epub 2014 Sep 12. — View Citation
Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M; Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, The National Academies. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Nov;102(11):1621-30. Erratum in: J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 May;103(5):563. — View Citation
* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Liking of Apple Crisp | Overall liking of apple crisp with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely ) | Day of taste testing | |
| Primary | Overall Liking of Tea | Overall liking of tea with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely ) | day of taste testing | |
| Primary | Overall Liking of Oatmeal | Overall liking of oatmeal with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely ) | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Apple Crisp | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Apple Crisp | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Recipe of Apple Crisp | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Tea | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | Day of taste testings | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Tea | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Recipe of Tea | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Oatmeal | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Oatmeal | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing | |
| Secondary | Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Oatmeal | Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third. | day of taste testing |