Abdominal Laparoscopic and/or Robotic Surgery Clinical Trial
Official title:
Automated Closed-Loop Versus Restrictive Fluid Therapy in Abdominal Surgery: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | January 2017 |
Source | Erasme University Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic variables and outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic and/or robotic elective abdominal surgery. Patients will receive either an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) guided by non-invasive flow monitoring or a restrictive fluid therapy of 4ml/kg/h.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | March 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Laparoscopic and/or robotic elective abdominal surgery( colorectal, gynecological, urological) Exclusion Criteria: - Intraoperative invasive monitoring (arterial line) - Open colorectal surgery (laparotomy) - Emergency surgery - Expected intraoperative blood loss greater than 1000ml - Arrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Erasme University Hospital | Brussels |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Erasme University Hospital |
Belgium,
Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Münch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1817-24. Epub 2007 Oct 9. — View Citation
Giglio MT, Marucci M, Testini M, Brienza N. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):637-46. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep279. Review. — View Citation
Rinehart J, Lilot M, Lee C, Joosten A, Huynh T, Canales C, Imagawa D, Demirjian A, Cannesson M. Closed-loop assisted versus manual goal-directed fluid therapy during high-risk abdominal surgery: a case-control study with propensity matching. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 19;19:94. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0827-7. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Preload independent state | The percentage intraoperative time spent with stroke volume variation < 13% and/or cardiac index > 2.4 L/min/m2 | 6 hours | |
Secondary | Additional fluids administered intraoperatively | 6 hours | ||
Secondary | Number of closed-loop override by the attending anesthesiologist | 6 hours | ||
Secondary | Hospital length of stay | up to 90 days post surgery | ||
Secondary | Postoperative complications | Major complications include cardiac (acute coronary syndrome/ arrhythmia), pulmonary (embolism/edema), gastrointestinal (bowel and surgical anastomotic leak/internal or external fistulas/peritoneal effusions), renal (renal failure requiring dialysis), infectious (peritonitis/ sepsis), coagulation (bleeding), wound dehiscence, stroke, reoperation, readmission, and death. Minor complications include unplanned ICU admission, pneumonia/pleural effusion, deep venous thrombosis, paralytic ileus, renal insufficiency, infection (superficial wound infection/fever/urinary infection) and confusion/delirium. |
up to 90 days after hospitalization |