Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03039946
Other study ID # P2016/526
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received January 31, 2017
Last updated March 27, 2017
Start date January 2017
Est. completion date March 2017

Study information

Verified date January 2017
Source Erasme University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic variables and outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic and/or robotic elective abdominal surgery. Patients will receive either an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) guided by non-invasive flow monitoring or a restrictive fluid therapy of 4ml/kg/h.


Description:

Perioperative fluid management is a topic of much debate that has intensified over recent years. Studies have shown improved postoperative outcomes with restricted fluid administration in the perioperative period for moderate risk abdominal surgery. They concluded that in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, intraoperative restrictive fluid management was associated with a reduction in postoperative morbidity and shortened hospital stay. Current standard practice is a crystalloid based fluid therapy guided by static hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, and diuresis. However, several studies have criticized this cookbook approach and recommend tailoring management to specific physiologic dynamic endpoints such as stroke volume variation and cardiac output using a flow monitoring device. Our team has demonstrated that the use of a closed-loop system is feasible and allows precise titration of fluid administration in abdominal and vascular surgery using either a minimally or a non-invasive monitoring system.

Goal:

This study compares hemodynamic variables and outcome in patients who will receive either automated closed-loop fluid therapy guided by non-invasive flow monitoring or restrictive fluid therapy of 4ml/kg/h. Both groups consist of the same population undergoing laparoscopic and/or robotic surgery.

Hypothesis:

A closed-loop assisted intraoperative GDFT when compared to restrictive fluid therapy will provide better hemodynamic variables.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date March 2017
Est. primary completion date March 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Laparoscopic and/or robotic elective abdominal surgery( colorectal, gynecological, urological)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Intraoperative invasive monitoring (arterial line)

- Open colorectal surgery (laparotomy)

- Emergency surgery

- Expected intraoperative blood loss greater than 1000ml

- Arrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Laparoscopic and/or Robotic Surgery

Intervention

Device:
Closed-Loop GDFT
Patients receive fluids in the form of 100ml boluses of crystalloid (Plasmalyte) over 6 minutes via an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) system guided by non-invasive flow monitoring (Clearsight system). Additional boluses of colloid or crystalloid can be administered under the attending anesthesiologist's discretion (e.g. to compensate blood loss) .
Other:
Restrictive Fluid Therapy
Patients receive fluids (Plasmalyte) via a restrictive approach with a baseline of of 4ml/kg/h. Additional boluses of colloid or crystalloid can be administered under the attending anesthesiologist's discretion (e.g. to compensate blood loss) .

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Erasme University Hospital Brussels

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Erasme University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (3)

Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Münch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1817-24. Epub 2007 Oct 9. — View Citation

Giglio MT, Marucci M, Testini M, Brienza N. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):637-46. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep279. Review. — View Citation

Rinehart J, Lilot M, Lee C, Joosten A, Huynh T, Canales C, Imagawa D, Demirjian A, Cannesson M. Closed-loop assisted versus manual goal-directed fluid therapy during high-risk abdominal surgery: a case-control study with propensity matching. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 19;19:94. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0827-7. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Preload independent state The percentage intraoperative time spent with stroke volume variation < 13% and/or cardiac index > 2.4 L/min/m2 6 hours
Secondary Additional fluids administered intraoperatively 6 hours
Secondary Number of closed-loop override by the attending anesthesiologist 6 hours
Secondary Hospital length of stay up to 90 days post surgery
Secondary Postoperative complications Major complications include cardiac (acute coronary syndrome/ arrhythmia), pulmonary (embolism/edema), gastrointestinal (bowel and surgical anastomotic leak/internal or external fistulas/peritoneal effusions), renal (renal failure requiring dialysis), infectious (peritonitis/ sepsis), coagulation (bleeding), wound dehiscence, stroke, reoperation, readmission, and death.
Minor complications include unplanned ICU admission, pneumonia/pleural effusion, deep venous thrombosis, paralytic ileus, renal insufficiency, infection (superficial wound infection/fever/urinary infection) and confusion/delirium.
up to 90 days after hospitalization