Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01677806
Other study ID # JNMGH20120821
Secondary ID
Status Enrolling by invitation
Phase Phase 3
First received August 23, 2012
Last updated September 9, 2014
Start date October 2012
Est. completion date December 2014

Study information

Verified date September 2014
Source Jinan Military General Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is now a therapeutic option for individuals for whom medical management has not been successful or for those who are at risk for developing complications due to long-term immobilization. Recently, three randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning PVP have been published with conflicting results. Two RCTs with a sham control intervention failed to show an advantage of vertebroplasty over placebo for participants with acute, subacute, and chronic fractures or severe pain. In the third RCT, PVP compared to optimal conservative treatment showed significant immediate postoperative pain relief in the vertebroplasty group, but not at 3 and 12 months. To examine these issues, this study is initiated to compare PVP with conservative therapy in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Moreover, this study addresses concerns about the possibility that PVP increases the incidence of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae.


Description:

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVCFs) are common in the elderly population, with an estimated 1.4 million new fractures occurring every year worldwide. Patients may present with pain and frequently require hospital admission for analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing). While their back pain may last for 6-12 weeks, complications such as pneumonia, decubitus ulcers, venous thromboembolism, and even death may occur. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is now a therapeutic option for individuals for whom medical management has not been successful or for those who are at risk for developing complications due to long-term immobilization. Recently, three randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning PVP have been published with conflicting results. So this study is to compare PVP with conservative therapy in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Moreover, this study addresses concerns about the possibility that PVP increases the incidence of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae.

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), Participants in this study will be allocated randomly to PVP or conservative treatment.All Participants will be asked to fill out standard questionnaires to provide clinical information at baseline (the day of randomization), and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment. Cross-over will not be offered before 12 months after randomization. All standard questionnaires (except the 1-day questionnaire) consist of the VAS score, Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO), EQ-5D, and Roland-Morris Disability (RMD) Questionnaire. Furthermore,additional questions about pain treatment, hospital stay, outpatient visits,medical aids, and medical costs will be completed with the help of a nurse practitioner.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Enrolling by invitation
Enrollment 140
Est. completion date December 2014
Est. primary completion date October 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 50 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- 50 Years and older

- have a confirmed diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia.

- acute, painful OVCFs from T4-L5

- clinical onset < 6 weeks

- vertebral compression fracture on spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss)

- Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] score = 4 for pain

Exclusion Criteria:

- severe cardio-pulmonary condition

- untreatable coagulopathy

- active local or systemic infection

- current malignancy, or radicular or caudal compression syndrome

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Percutaneous vertebroplasty
Percutaneous vertebroplasty Placement of PMMA into vertebral compression fracture
Other:
Conservative therapy
Conservative therapy mainly consists of optimal pain medication. Pain management is titrated according to patients' needs, including analgesia, bed rest, and physical support (bracing).

Locations

Country Name City State
China The Jinan Military General Hospital Jinan Shandong

Sponsors (6)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jinan Military General Hospital Beijing Friendship Hospital, China Medical University, China, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary VAS score Pain assessment is based on the VAS scale, a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever), for which a decrease of 3.0 or more points from baseline is considered to be clinically significant pain relief. at 1 month No
Secondary QUALEFFO total score QUALEFFO total score is measured with the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). This questionnaire consists of 41 items and includes five domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment. No
Secondary ED-5Q score EQ-5D is a standardized instrument utilized as a measure of health-related quality of life outcomes. Furthermore, EQ-5D is one of a few measures recommended for use in cost-effectiveness analyses by the Washington Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health & Medicine as well as in National guidelines in economic evaluation. at baseline, 1-week, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12- month No
Secondary RMD score The RMD questionnaire is a disability questionnaire that measures the functional status of patients with back pain. RMD scores range from 0 to 24, with higher numbers indicating worse physical functioning. at baseline, 1-week, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12- month No
Secondary New vertebral fractures New vertebral fractures are defined as a decrease (compared with baseline radiographs) of 20% or more, and at least 4 mm, in any of the three vertebral heights (anterior, middle, or posterior) on follow-up. at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year. Yes
Secondary Total medical costs This study will calculate total medical costs through summarizing all costs of drugs,family doctor,physiotherapist, hospital stay, and outpatient visits, etc. at 1-month, 12-month No