Post-tetanic Count on One Arm, the Other Arm is the Control Clinical Trial
Verified date | March 2010 |
Source | Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Canada: Health Canada |
Study type | Observational |
The purpose of this study is to see how long does the effect of a post-tetanic facilitation last on subsequent train-of-four. The investigators hypothesis is that the effect last at least 30 minutes.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 22 |
Est. completion date | April 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient having general anesthesia in dorsal decubitus with both arm available for at least an hour and a half Exclusion Criteria: - Age >75 or <18 - Neuromuscular disease - difficult laryngoscopy predicted - Allergy to rocuronium - Malignant hyperthermia - Full stomach - Drugs the influence neuromuscular blockers - Decision of the clinician to exclude his patient |
Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Prospective
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont | Montréal | Quebec |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The difference at 30 minutes after the post-tetanic count between the TOF% in both arms, we expect a difference of more than 10% | |||
Secondary | The difference at 30 minutes after the post-tetanic count on the T1% (of the calibrated T1) in both arms, we expect a difference of more than 10% | |||
Secondary | The difference of the slope of recuperation on TOF and T1% after a post-tetanic count vs the control arm that had no tetanic stimulation |