Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Web Fracture Liaison Service (e

Status Withdrawn

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare web FLS model (e_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture.

Clinical Trial Description

Osteoporotic fractures such as hip fractures and severe fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and impose a large financial burden on healthcare systems. Patients with osteoporosis-related fractures are at higher risk of subsequent fractures. Other severe fractures (pelvis, vertebrae, humerus) have similar consequences, pelvis. The risk of refracture after fracture depends on the time: it is 5 times higher in the first 2-3 years, and 2 times higher after. This notion of Imminent Fracture Risk is the basis for the development of post-fracture care pathways called "fracture liaison. The implementation of FLS is the most effective way to reduce the risk of secondary fracture. Despite their success, FLS programs are not an integral part of post-fracture care throughout the France. The investigators believe that the barriers to the implementation of such a pathway are multiple and are largely related to the lack of accessibility for patients to FLS, and to the mobilization of important and unsustainable human resources. Some French public hospitals or institutions are currently building some e_FLS models based on an automatic detection of patients with fractures, and a on a cloud-based system where practitioners across the health care sector can communicate and jointly manage osteoporotic patients. The investigators' hypothesis is that this web FLS (e_FLS) is at least as effective as the classical FLS for the secondary fracture prevention. The objective of the investigators' study is to compare web FLS model (e_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture (evAB project). ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05303350
Study type	Observational
Source	Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Contact
Status	Withdrawn
Phase
Start date	February 2024
Completion date	July 2025

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06287502` - Efficacy of Structured Exercise-Nutritional Intervention on Sarcopenia in Patients With Osteoporosis	N/A
Completed	`NCT03822078` - Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Denosumab (AMG 162) in Japanese Postmenopausal Women	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT05845021` - Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT00092066` - A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of an Investigational Drug and Dietary Supplement in Men and Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis (0217A-227)	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT04754711` - Interest of Nutritional Care of Children With Sickle Cell Disease on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition	N/A
Completed	`NCT04736693` - Replication of the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial in Healthcare Claims Data
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06431867` - Primary Care Management of Osteoporosis in Older Women
Completed	`NCT02922478` - Role of Comorbidities in Chronic Heart Failure Study
Recruiting	`NCT02616627` - Association Between DXA Results and the Complications, Clinical Courses and Outcomes in Chronic Dialysis Patients
Recruiting	`NCT02635022` - Fragility Fracture Liaison Service and Anti-osteoporosis Medication Monitoring Service Study
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02617303` - Prevention of Falls and Its Consequences in Elderly People	N/A
Completed	`NCT02566655` - Clinical Trial of Intravenous Infusion of Fucosylated Bone Marrow Mesenchyme Cells in Patients With Osteoporosis	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT02559648` - Denosumab vs Placebo in Patients With Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03420716` - Symbiotic Yogurt, Calcium Absorption and Bone Health in Young Adult Women	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02223572` - Secondary Fracture Prevention in Patients Who Suffered From Osteoporotic Fracture	N/A
Completed	`NCT02003716` - DeFRA Questionnaire as an Anamnestic Form	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT01854086` - Compliance and Persistence With Osteoporosis Treatment and Attitude Towards Future Therapy Among Post-menopausal Israeli Women During Drug Treatment or Drug Holiday	N/A
Unknown status	`NCT01913834` - Nasally and sc Administered Teriparatide in Healthy Volunteers	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT01401556` - C-STOP Fracture Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT01757340` - Calorie Restriction With Leucine Supplementation	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Web Fracture Liaison Service (e_FLS) to Fracture Liaison Services in France: the evAB Study (evAB) — evAB

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms