Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Primary |
Change in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg SC Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Primary |
Change in the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Primary |
Change in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg SC Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Primary |
Change in the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in the PGA Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change In The PGA Scores From Baseline To Week 44 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That Of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage Of Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo, Who Had A Response At Week 16, With Response Defined As An Improvement By =30% In The WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen, Who Had A Response At Week 16, With Response Defined As An Improvement By =30% In The WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1 mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to the Average Score Across Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16, in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1 mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to the Average Score Across Weeks 36, 40 and 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 36, 40 and 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change In WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline To The Average Score Across Weeks 4, 8, 12 And 16, in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline To The Average Score Across Weeks 36, 40 And 44 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 36, 40 and 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in the PGA Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1 mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change In The PGA Scores From Baseline To Week 44 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That Of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to the Average Score Across Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16, in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1 mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to the Average Score Across Weeks 36, 40 and 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 36, 40 and 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Change In WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline To The Average Score Across Weeks 4, 8, 12 And 16, in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage Of Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo, Who Had A Response At Week 16, With Response Defined As An Improvement By =30% In The WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to Week 16 |
|
| Secondary |
Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline To The Average Score Across Weeks 36, 40 And 44 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo |
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
Baseline to average score across weeks 36, 40 and 44 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) (as Confirmed by Adjudication) - Year 1 |
|
Baseline to Week 52 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With AA (as Confirmed by Adjudication) - Year 2 |
|
First dose of study drug in Year 2 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With AA (as Confirmed by Adjudication) - Year 1 and Year 2 |
|
Day 1 through week 104E (Extension) |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With Destructive Arthropathy (DA) (as Confirmed by Adjudication) - Year 1 |
|
Baseline to Week 52 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With DA (as Confirmed by Adjudication) - Year 2 |
|
First dose of study drug in Year 2 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With DA (as Confirmed by Adjudication) - Year 1 and Year 2 |
|
Day 1 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) - Year 1 |
|
Baseline to Week 52 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of TEAEs - Year 2 |
|
First dose of study drug in Year 2 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of TEAEs - Year 1 and Year 2 |
|
Day 1 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) - Year 1 |
|
Baseline to Week 52 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) - Year 2 |
|
First dose of study drug in Year 2 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) - Year 1 and Year 2 |
|
Day 1 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy AESI That Require a Neurology or Other Specialty Consultation - Year 1 |
|
Baseline to Week 52 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy AESI That Require a Neurology or Other Specialty Consultation - Year 2 |
|
First dose of study drug in Year 2 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy AESI That Require a Neurology or Other Specialty Consultation - Year 1 and Year 2 |
|
Day 1 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With Any Type of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) in Year 1 |
|
Baseline to Week 52 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With Any Type of All-Cause JR in Year 2 |
|
First dose of study drug in Year 2 through week 104E |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants With Any Type of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) - Year 1 and Year 2 |
|
Day 1 through week 104E |
|
