Study of Knee Replacements for Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis, Knee Clinical Trial

— PFA/TKR  

Official title:

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA) Versus Total Knee Replacement (TKR) for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01326156
• Other study ID #: 56789
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 2007
• Est. completion date: October 2024

Study information

• Verified date: November 2020
• Source: University of Aarhus
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a randomized comparison of PFA and TKR in treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Description:

Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis can be a disabling condition of the knee necessitating knee arthroplasty. It is debated whether total knee replacement or isolated patellofemoral replacement is the better treatment option. This randomized trial attempts to give a qualified answer to the debate by comparing clinical outcome (range of movement, stability, effusion, patellofemoral tracking, tenderness, stair climbing), patient self assessment scores (EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score, KOOS, SF-36, AKS), complications (infections, revisions), longevity (survival analysis) and cost (direct and indirect) for the two implant types. The Avon patellofemoral implant has been chosen, as this is the patellofemoral implant with the best documentation. The PFC Sigma CR total knee implant has been chosen as it a current standard implant and market leader.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: October 2024
• Est. primary completion date: October 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Isolated PF-OA

Exclusion Criteria:

• Medial or lateral OA

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Osteoarthritis
• Osteoarthritis, Knee

Intervention

Device:
• Knee arthroplasty
Comparison of patellofemoral arthroplasty versus conventional total knee arthroplasty in cases of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	Aarhus University Hospital	Aarhus

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Aarhus	DePuy Orthopaedics, Stryker Nordic

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Patient-reported outcomes (disease-specific and generic QoL instruments)	The physical functioning score of the Short Form (36) Health Survey is the primary outcome measure of the study. Disease-specific patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Score, KOOS and Kujala) and a second generic quality of life measure (EQ5D).	10 years
Secondary	Implant survival, clinician assessment and cost.	Secondary outcome measures relate to implant survival, clinician assessment and cost. Implant survival will be assessed by 5- and 10-year implant survival rates and by analyzing causes for revision surgery. Clinician assessment includes Knee Society Score (stability, range of movement, effusion, tenderness etc.). Assessments of immediate and long-term costs are based on patient diaries, sick leave, use of medical services and drug prescriptions.	10 years