Clinical Trials Logo

Osteoarthritis, Knee clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00904605 Terminated - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Lidocaine Patch Versus Celecoxib in Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Start date: June 2004
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Lidoderm compared with celecoxib 200mg in treating pain from osteoarthritis of the knee.

NCT ID: NCT00904462 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee

Start date: August 2004
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.

NCT ID: NCT00904319 Completed - Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Aquatic Power Training

Start date: April 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) accounts for a significant proportion of mobility limitations and is one of the most disabling problems facing the growing population of older adults. The purpose of this research is to reduce disablement of older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

NCT ID: NCT00901628 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Start date: April 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) would provide additional benefits in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for whom contemporary pain control protocols using the continuous femoral nerve block, intra-venous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA)and preemptive oral medications. We hypothesized that PMDI would reduce pain level and consumption of PCA and acute pain rescuer and would provide better functional recovery and patient satisfaction. We also hypothesized that the incidence of side effects and complications of the PMDI would be similar to the No-PMDI.

NCT ID: NCT00894361 Terminated - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing All-Polyethylene Tibia Total Knee Designs

Start date: October 2001
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study will be designed to compare prospectively, in a randomized fashion, the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of a nonmodular (all-polyethylene tibi/AP) fixed-bearing posterior cruciate substituting design with a modular posterior cruciate substituting rotating platform (RP) design for total knee arthroplasty. Comparing these two designs will afford the investigators information in the following areas: 1. Does a RP design offer improvement in range of motion over a AP design? 2. Does a RP design have improved wear characteristics over a nonmodular AP design? 3. Is there a clear clinical advantage to the RP design that justifies its increased cost? Answering these questions will allow surgeons to use RP designs appropriately in different demand populations. This study was designed to address the questions of whether an RP design offers improvement in ROM, Knee Society scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores, selected Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores or radiographic measures, over an APT design. The investigators' primary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in these outcome measures at a minimum two year followup. A secondary hypothesis based on the anticipated long-term followup of this group was that there would be no difference in implant survival.

NCT ID: NCT00889304 Completed - Clinical trials for Medial Monocompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Position HTO Multicenter NIS

Position HTO
Start date: July 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Evaluation of the Position HTO system in patients with unicompartmental medial arthrosis after open wedge high tibial osteotomy

NCT ID: NCT00865865 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Computer Aided Gap Balancing Improves Sagittal Stability and Outcomes for Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Start date: May 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Computer Aided Surgery in total knee arthroplasty improves knee stability and functional outcomes more than conventional total knee arthroplasty.

NCT ID: NCT00865046 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Periosteal Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis

PST
Start date: November 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

185 veterans with chronic knee pain and advanced knee osteoarthritis will be recruited to participate in this study designed to test the effectiveness of a special type of electrical acupuncture called periosteal stimulation (PST). Participants will be divided into three groups. They will receive PST or a control condition once a week for 10 weeks. Two-thirds of the participants will receive booster sessions periodically over the course of the next 6 months. Everyone will be called monthly during the 6 month period and then will be asked to return for an evaluation on site at the end of this period.

NCT ID: NCT00864097 Terminated - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Analgesic Efficacy And Safety of Tanezumab Added On To Diclofenac SR In Patients With Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip

Start date: August 11, 2009
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy.

NCT ID: NCT00853398 Terminated - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY in Total Knee Arthroplasty

MIS GEN II
Start date: October 2004
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Overall study design: A prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical studies comparing the minimal invasive and the standard surgical total knee replacement technique (control) using the Genesis II total knee system. The study will collect efficacy, safety and socio-economical data over 2 years. An additional 5 years follow-up interval is optional. The objectives (short-term follow-up) of the study are to: 1. Assess whether the improvement in Pain and Range of motion per Knee Society scoring system and VAS score. 2. Assess whether there are any differences between the surgical techniques as regards complication rate. 3. Assess whether the hospital stay and the rehabilitation time (Straight leg raise, Active/passive ROM) of the patients differs between the two techniques. 4. Assess the x-ray mechanical alignment between the two techniques. Attempts will be made to assess whether the collected peri-operative data (including incision length, blood loss, wound appearance, hospital readmissions and operative time) differs between the two surgical techniques. The primary objectives (mid-term follow-up) of the study are to: 1. Improvement in Pain and Function per Knee Society Scoring system 2. Number and Extent of Radiographic Lucencies >2mm 3. Revision and knee-related adverse events 4. Improvement in Quality-of-life via the VAS score 5 investigational sites will participate and enroll a total of approximately 250 patients over a 12 months period. Thus, each site will enroll 50 patients.