Clinical Trials Logo

Osteoarthritis, Knee clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00652808 Completed - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Randomized Comparison Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Valdecoxib 10 mg Once Daily and Naproxen 500 mg Twice Daily in Treating the Signs and Symptoms of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Start date: May 2004
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study was performed to demonstrate that treatment with valdecoxib 10 mg daily (QD) was at least as effective as with naproxen 500 mg twice daily (BID), a standard non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), when taken for 6 weeks in Korean subjects with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Secondary objectives were to assess the overall safety and tolerability of valdecoxib 10 mg QD taken for 6 weeks in Korean subjects with symptomatic OA of the knee.

NCT ID: NCT00650624 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

A Dose-Ranging Study Of Valdecoxib 5 Mg, 10 Mg, And 20 Mg Once Daily Versus Placebo In Patients With Osteoarthritis Of The Knee (Japan)

Start date: June 2003
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

To determine the therapeutic dose range of valdecoxib by comparing the efficacy of three dosing regimens (5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg once daily) with placebo for relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. To assess safety and tolerability of multiple doses of valdecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

NCT ID: NCT00648258 Completed - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

A Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Randomized Comparison Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Valdecoxib 10mg Once Daily And Naproxen 500mg Twice Daily In Treating The Signs And Symptoms Of Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip In Taiwan

Start date: July 2003
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of valdecoxib by comparing valdecoxib 10 mg daily (QD) with naproxen 500 mg twice daily (BID) in treating the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. The study was designed to collect comparative information for the local population (Taiwan).

NCT ID: NCT00647231 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

HKT-500-US12 In Adult Patients With OA Knee Pain

Start date: March 2008
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The objective of this study is to characterize the analgesic properties of single dose study of HKT-500 in subjects with pain caused by mild to moderate OA of the knee

NCT ID: NCT00643799 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Safety and Efficacy of Celecoxib Versus Naproxen in the 6-month Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

CLOAK
Start date: March 2004
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

To compare the safety and efficacy of celecoxib versus naproxen for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT00642772 Completed - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Group Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Start date: March 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and disability. Physical therapy is a key part of treatment for OA, but VA Medical Centers are often limited in their capacity to provide physical therapy services for veterans with knee OA. The goal of this study is to perform a preliminary work on a group-based physical therapy program for veterans with knee osteoarthritis (OA), in preparation for a larger project. This work will allow us to assess the feasibility of conducting group-based physical therapy program and to plan a larger grant submission based on the findings of this initial study. We hypothesize that the group-based program will be feasible to administer and will result in improved pain and function.

NCT ID: NCT00640627 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Who Were Unresponsive to Naproxen and Ibuprofen

Start date: December 2003
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

To compare the safety and efficacy of celecoxib versus placebo in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis who were unresponsive to treatment with prescription strength naproxen and ibuprofen or who could not tolerate prescription strength naproxen and ibuprofen

NCT ID: NCT00638807 Completed - Clinical trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Safety and Efficacy of Celecoxib Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Who Were Unresponsive to Naproxen and Ibuprofen

Start date: December 2003
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

To compare the efficacy and safety of celecoxib versus placebo for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in patients who were unresponsive to prescription strength naproxen and ibuprofen or who could not tolerate prescription strength naproxen and ibuprofen

NCT ID: NCT00635349 Completed - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

A Comparative Study of Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen Tablets Maintenance Versus Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Maintenance in Participants With Knee Osteoarthritis

Start date: May 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 milligram (mg) plus acetaminophen 325 mg maintenance with that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) maintenance in participants with knee osteoarthritis (a progressive and degenerative joint disease, in which the joints become painful and stiff) whose pain was relieved after the add-on treatment of tramadol hydrochloride to NSAIDs.

NCT ID: NCT00633113 Completed - Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Outcomes (MIKRO) Study

MIKRO
Start date: November 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical, radiographic (x-ray) and cost effectiveness outcomes (cost relative to risks and benefits) of two different minimally invasive knee joint replacement surgical techniques. The primary study hypothesis is that in comparing total knee replacement performed with the two different surgical techniques that respect four minimally invasive surgery principles (low-profile instrumentation, "minimally invasive" incision, overall minimal knee surgical intervention), a faster return to function will result when the technique does not incise the tendon.