Affective Effects of Pre-surgery Opioids: a Randomized, Doubleblind Placebo-controlled Trial

Opioid Use Clinical Trial

— AFFECT2  

Official title:

Understanding Opioid Use Before and After Surgery in Norway: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05639712
• Other study ID #: AFFECT2 Version 2, 04.11.2022
• Secondary ID: 2022-002938-13
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: December 13, 2022
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Oslo University Hospital
• Contact: Gernot Ernst, MD, PhD
• Phone: +4748072777
• Email: bserng[@]vestreviken.no
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

1. To investigate and compare the affective short-term effects of opioid drugs: morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl, administered to the patients before the induction of general anesthesia. 2. Charting opioid use after surgery in patients treated at hospitals in Norway 3. Identify predictors for postoperative opioid use and persistent pain

Description:

The aim of the present study is to assess and compare, with a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, the affective effects of three commonly used opioid analgesics (Morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl) administered in three different doses before surgery in a clinical setting associated with physiological and psychological stress. As a starting point, we have conducted an observational quality control study on peri-operative opioid pain management in day surgery patients. Quality control study - a pilot study In this observational quality control study, we measured acute effects of the opioid agonist Remifentanil (effect site concentration 5ng/ml, Minto model) in day surgery patients on the operating table at Kongsberg hospital. Patients rated their levels of "feeling good" and "anxious" on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) immediately before and 1 minute after receiving remifentanil infusion. They also rated drug-specific effects such as "feeling high", "liking the drug effects" and their "level of drug-related discomfort". Moreover, we collected data on postoperative opioid use and pain during recovery through a telephone interview on the day following the surgery. The study was conducted with the usual standard hospital treatment and as such, did not interfere with the patients' medical procedures. All the procedures were approved by the data protection officer at Kongsberg Hospital, and all included patients signed informed consent on the day of surgery. In the weeks prior to surgery participants received a questionnaire to assess their pain levels, nervousness and demographics as part of the hospital's standard procedure. On the day of surgery, approximately 30 min before surgery (T2) patients were asked to fill in questionnaires to assess mood, pain and prior opioid use. One minute before and one minute after opioid ( administration (T3), the patient was asked to rate mood, anxiety, drug liking and drug related discomfort. On the day following surgery patients were contacted by phone to assess their mood, pain and pain interference, as well as their pain relief strategies in the last 24h (e.g. use of provided analgesics). 160 patients were included in the pilot quality control study. The results of the pilot study show that patients report a clear feeling of 'drug high' after remifentanil infusion. Surprisingly, however, the opioid analgesic induced only a weak reduction of anxiety, and the majority of patients reported feeling worse or equally good, but not better, after the infusion. In the postoperative phone interview, many patients tell us they have not used any of the opioid drugs prescribed for at-home pain relief during the first 24 hours are recovering at home. Stated reasons include a fear of addiction, as well as a wish to keep the analgesics in case of breakthrough/peak pain at a later stage. These preliminary results do not support the opioid pre-induction procedure as an effective manner to produce pre-surgery stress relief. It might be possible that the subjective perception of stress relief does not match the physiological relief reaction to stress. On the basis of these intriguing, preliminary findings, we will now conduct a more comprehensive randomized double-blind controlled study comparing different classes of pre-surgical opioid analgesics on the subjective and physiological affective reactions in an acute stress clinical situation in Norway. Possible participants of the AFFECT2 RCT (randomized controlled trial) will also be asked if they wish to join a parallel longitudinal study conducted in collaboration with the University of Oslo (UiO) in which we will collect and analyse data on relevant pre-surgery risk factors for problematic opioid use, and to quantify opioid-induced analgesia before and after surgery using prescription registry data.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 1000
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Health status ASA1 (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status) or ASA2 as categorised by a medical doctor at the hospital based on medical history, physical examination, laboratory test etc. unrelated to the current study. ASA1 and ASA2 (ASA1 is defined as "Healthy, non-smoking, no or minimal alcohol use" and ASA2 is defined as "Mild diseases only without substantive functional limitations). Being eligible for day surgery means participants are overtly healthy as determined by clinical staff.
• The participant is considered as eligible for the use of fentanyl, morphine and oxycodone by a medical doctor at the hospital, based on an overall assessment of the psychiatric and somatic condition, used medical drugs, regarding possible interactions and contraindications for the use of the study medicaments.
• Body weight and body mass index (BMI) within the range 18-35 kg/m2 (inclusive).
• Capable of giving signed informed consent as which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
• Having good verbal communication skills in Norwegian.
• Patients undergoing planned day surgery with general anesthesia (outpatient sample).
• Orthopedic, rectal, gynecological, hand and foot surgery, and minor vascular procedures.
• Inpatients undergoing planned gynecological and orthopedic surgery.
• Hysterectomy, laparoscopic ovariectomy, lumbal herniotomy and other related procedures.
• Minor gastrointestinal surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Known allergic reactions to morphine, oxycodone,or fentanyl. Known allergic reactions to any of the incredients described in the SPC, pt 6.1.

2. Severe chronic obstructive lung disease,

3. Cor pulmonale,

4. Severe bronchial asthma,

5. Severe respiratory failure with hypoxemia and hypercapnia

6. Moderate to severe hepatic impairment,

7. Moderate to severe kidney failure

8. Acute abdomen

9. Increased brain pressure

10. Head trauma

11. Use of MAO blockers in the last two weeks

12. Hypovolemia

13. Hypotension

14. Myasthenia gravis

15. Any other health status not corresponding to ASA1 or ASA2. This includes patients with severe disease burden, major psychiatric disorders that could interfere with the procedures and communication.

16. Pregnancy. Women of childbearing potential defined as all premenopausal female (a postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause) will be asked if they are pregnant.

17. Breastfeeding women.

18. Illegal drugs use like opioids, cocaine and amphetamine

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Affective Symptoms
• Opioid Use

Intervention

Drug:
• Placebo
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of placebo intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Morphine 2.5 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of 2.5 mg morphine intravenously. This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Morphine 5 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 5 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Morphine 10 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of morphine 10 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Oxycodone 2.5 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 2.5 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Oxycodone 5 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 5 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Oxycodone 10 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of oxycodone 10 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Fentanyl 0.025 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.025 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Fentanyl 0.05 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.05 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia
• Fentanyl 0.1 mg i.v.
The patient is given standardized questions about their well-being and affective state before and after the administration of fentanyl 0.1 mg intravenously . This is carried out on the operating table right before anesthesia

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Norway	Harald Lenz	Oslo

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Oslo University Hospital	Vestre VikenHF Kongsberg Sykehus

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Norway, 

References & Publications (30)

Angst MS, Lazzeroni LC, Phillips NG, Drover DR, Tingle M, Ray A, Swan GE, Clark JD. Aversive and reinforcing opioid effects: a pharmacogenomic twin study. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):22-37. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825a2a4e. — View Citation

Astuto, M., & Lauretta, D. (2009). Anesthesia Induction. In M. Astuto (Ed.), Basics (pp. 85-99). Milano: Springer Milan.

Bershad AK, Miller MA, Norman GJ, de Wit H. Effects of opioid- and non-opioid analgesics on responses to psychosocial stress in humans. Horm Behav. 2018 Jun;102:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 24. — View Citation

Bjerkeset O, Romild U, Smith GD, Hveem K. The associations of high levels of C-reactive protein with depression and myocardial infarction in 9258 women and men from the HUNT population study. Psychol Med. 2011 Feb;41(2):345-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000887. Epub 2010 May 6. — View Citation

Choudhary P, Dutta A, Sethi N, Sood J, Rai D, Gupta M. Pre-induction fentanyl dose-finding study for controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;63(8):653-659. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_866_18. — View Citation

Colasanti A, Rabiner EA, Lingford-Hughes A, Nutt DJ. Opioids and anxiety. J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Nov;25(11):1415-33. doi: 10.1177/0269881110367726. Epub 2010 Jun 8. — View Citation

Courtwright, D. T. (2001). Dark Paradise: A History of Opiate Addiction in America. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Dale O, Moksnes K, Kaasa S. European Palliative Care Research Collaborative pain guidelines: opioid switching to improve analgesia or reduce side effects. A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):494-503. doi: 10.1177/0269216310384902. — View Citation

Deighton S, Neville A, Pusch D, Dobson K. Biomarkers of adverse childhood experiences: A scoping review. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:719-732. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.097. Epub 2018 Aug 25. — View Citation

Doleman B, Leonardi-Bee J, Heinink TP, Bhattacharjee D, Lund JN, Williams JP. Pre-emptive and preventive opioids for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012624.pub2. — View Citation

Drewes AM, Jensen RD, Nielsen LM, Droney J, Christrup LL, Arendt-Nielsen L, Riley J, Dahan A. Differences between opioids: pharmacological, experimental, clinical and economical perspectives. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;75(1):60-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04317.x. — View Citation

Dutta A, Sethi N, Choudhary P, Sood J, Panday BC, Chugh PT. The impact of preinduction fentanyl dosing strategy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Opioid Manag. 2018 Jul/Aug;14(4):283-293. doi: 10.5055/jom.2018.0460. — View Citation

Evans SM, Foltin RW, Levin FR, Fischman MW. Behavioral and subjective effects of DN-2327 (pazinaclone) and alprazolam in normal volunteers. Behav Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;6(2):176-186. — View Citation

Garland EL, Froeliger B, Zeidan F, Partin K, Howard MO. The downward spiral of chronic pain, prescription opioid misuse, and addiction: cognitive, affective, and neuropsychopharmacologic pathways. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 26. — View Citation

Helsedirektoratet. (2018). Utvikling og variasjon i kirurgisk behandling 2013-2017. Retrieved from Oslo:

Levy N, Mills P. Controlled-release opioids cause harm and should be avoided in management of postoperative pain in opioid naive patients. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):e86-e90. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 19. No abstract available. — View Citation

Li PH, Ue KL, Wagner A, Rutkowski R, Rutkowski K. Opioid Hypersensitivity: Predictors of Allergy and Role of Drug Provocation Testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov-Dec;5(6):1601-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.035. Epub 2017 May 24. — View Citation

Martel MO, Dolman AJ, Edwards RR, Jamison RN, Wasan AD. The association between negative affect and prescription opioid misuse in patients with chronic pain: the mediating role of opioid craving. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 12. — View Citation

McHugh RK, Weiss RD, Cornelius M, Martel MO, Jamison RN, Edwards RR. Distress Intolerance and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Patients With Chronic Pain. J Pain. 2016 Jul;17(7):806-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 4. — View Citation

Morean ME, de Wit H, King AC, Sofuoglu M, Rueger SY, O'Malley SS. The drug effects questionnaire: psychometric support across three drug types. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 May;227(1):177-92. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2954-z. Epub 2012 Dec 28. — View Citation

Natusch D. Equianalgesic doses of opioids - their use in clinical practice. Br J Pain. 2012 Feb;6(1):43-6. doi: 10.1177/2049463712437628. No abstract available. — View Citation

Naude PJW, Roest AM, Stein DJ, de Jonge P, Doornbos B. Anxiety disorders and CRP in a population cohort study with 54,326 participants: The LifeLines study. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;19(6):461-470. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2018.1433325. Epub 2018 Feb 22. — View Citation

Schaffer CB, Nordahl TE, Schaffer LC, Howe J. Mood-elevating effects of opioid analgesics in patients with bipolar disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Fall;19(4):449-52. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2007.19.4.449. — View Citation

Sgoifo A, Carnevali L, Alfonso Mde L, Amore M. Autonomic dysfunction and heart rate variability in depression. Stress. 2015;18(3):343-52. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1045868. Epub 2015 May 25. — View Citation

Sneader, W. (2005). Drug discovery : a history. Chichester: Wiley.

Stanley TH. The history and development of the fentanyl series. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992 Apr;7(3 Suppl):S3-7. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(92)90047-l. — View Citation

Stone AL, Becker LG, Huber AM, Catalano RF. Review of risk and protective factors of substance use and problem use in emerging adulthood. Addict Behav. 2012 Jul;37(7):747-75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Feb 24. — View Citation

Thomas EA, Garland EL. Mindfulness is Associated With Increased Hedonic Capacity Among Chronic Pain Patients Receiving Extended Opioid Pharmacotherapy. Clin J Pain. 2017 Feb;33(2):166-173. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000379. — View Citation

Tracey I, Woolf CJ, Andrews NA. Composite Pain Biomarker Signatures for Objective Assessment and Effective Treatment. Neuron. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.019. — View Citation

Wang LP, Hermann C, Westrin P. Thiopentone requirements in adults after varying pre-induction doses of fentanyl. Anaesthesia. 1996 Sep;51(9):831-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12611.x. — View Citation

* Note: There are 30 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Heart rate	beats/min prior opioid and post opioid intravenously	10 min
Other	Heart rate variability	Heart rate variability (HRV) prior opioid and post opioid intravenously	10 min
Primary	Anxious	Asking the patient of feeling anxious; Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=not anxious and 10=feeling extremely anxious	8-10 minutes
Primary	Relaxed	Asking the patient of feeling relaxed. Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=not relaxed and 10=very relaxed.	8-10 minutes
Primary	Pain level	Asking the patient of pain level. Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=no pain and 10= worst pain imaginable	8-10 minutes
Primary	Good	Asking the patient of feeling good. Numeric rating scale 0 -10 prior opioid and post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling no good and 10= feeling very good.	8-10 minutes
Primary	Dizzy	Asking the patient of feeling dizzy. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not dizzy and 10=feeling very dizzy.	2-4 minutes
Primary	Sedated	Asking the patient of feeling sedated. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not sedated and 10=feeling very sedated.	2-4 minutes
Primary	Feeling high, Numeric rating scale 0 -10	Asking the patient of feeling high. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not high and 10=feeling very high.	2-4 minutes
Primary	Euphoric	Asking the patient of feeling high. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not euphoric and 10=feeling very euphoric.	2-4 minutes
Primary	Drug liking	Asking the patient of drug liking. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not drug liking and 10=feeling very drug liking.	2-4 minutes
Primary	Drug disliking	Asking the patient of drug disliking. Numeric rating scale 0-10 post opioid intravenously (or placebo). 0=feeling not drug disliking and 10=feeling very drug disliking.	2-4 minutes