View clinical trials related to Opioid-use Disorder.
Filter by:Effective treatment for opioid use disorders (OUDs) requires medications. Two medications for treating OUDs-buprenorphine and injectable naltrexone-can be prescribed in primary care (PC). However, despite the current opioid epidemic and expert recommendations that OUDs should be treated in PC, most PC clinics do not offer treatment for OUDs. This reflects a lack of consensus among health system leaders and clinicians that OUDs should be treated in PC. The PRimary care Opioid Use Disorders treatment (PROUD) Trial is a pragmatic cluster-randomized, quality improvement trial that evaluates implementation of a team-based approach to PC supported by a full time nurse (the "PROUD intervention"). This type of team-based PC is often referred to as "collaborative care" for management of OUDs in PC, and this type of trial is often referred to as a Hybrid Type III implementation trial. The trial is being conducted in 6 diverse health systems spanning 5 states (New York, Florida, Michigan, Texas, and Washington), with 2 PC clinics in each system randomized. One clinic is randomly selected to implement the PROUD intervention and the other continues usual PC (UPC). The overall objective of the PROUD trial is to provide information to guide health system leaders who are faced with the decision of whether or not to treat OUDs in PC, by evaluating the benefits of implementing the PROUD intervention that integrates high quality OUD treatment (i.e. buprenorphine or injectable naltrexone) into the normal flow of PC. The primary objective of the PROUD trial is to evaluate whether the PROUD intervention increases OUD treatment with buprenorphine or injectable naltrexone, documented in the electronic health records (EHRs) of PC patients, over a 2 year follow-up, as compared to UPC. The primary hypothesis is that there will be a significant increase in the number of patient-days of medication treatment for OUDs documented in the EHR of PC patients in the 2 years after clinics are randomized to the PROUD intervention compared to PC clinics randomized to UPC. This implementation objective reflects whether the PROUD intervention increases initiation of and/or retention in OUD treatment, documented in EHRs within medical settings. The main secondary objective is to test the hypothesis that PC patients with OUDs documented in their EHRs in the 3 years prior to randomization who receive care in PROUD intervention clinics, compared to those who receive care in UPC clinics, will have fewer days of acute care utilization (including urgent care, emergency department [ED] and hospital care) in the 2 years after randomization. This effectiveness objective assesses whether implementation of the MA Model improves patient outcomes.
The purpose of this research study is to: 1. assess how participants like the AWAITS e-health application as measured by their feedback on the intervention 2. test the impact of AWAITS on knowledge about opioid overdose and risk-reduction strategies. 3. assess the proportion of participants who accept a list of local treatment providers 4. test the impact of AWAITS on interest in being tested for HCV/HIV.
The investigators will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) study of 100 people with a history of opioid use disorder releasing to WA Department of Corrections (DOC) community corrections supervision in King County. Half of the subjects will receive treatment as usual (e.g. referral to treatment or outpatient drug counseling by DOC community corrections staff) and half will receive 6 months of intervention. The intervention involves treatment decision making, in which the study interventionists help subjects understand treatment choices, decide on the treatment that is best for them, get enrolled in treatment and remain in treatment. The study does not provide treatment, but works with treatment providers to facilitate access to care. The aims of this study are to determine: 1) whether study procedures can be implemented with as designed, 2) whether offenders can be enrolled and maintained in the study, 3) which medications/treatment options subjects select and their experiences and satisfaction with the interventions, and 4) preliminary intervention effect size on outcomes of interest including recidivism, drug use, hospitalization, and treatment enrollment and retention.
The aims of the current study phase (R21) are: Aim 1. Develop a patient decision aid (PtDA-MAT) by incorporating best available scientific evidence on MAT as well as feedback from patients and clinical providers related to clinical priorities, perceived utility, and acceptability; Aim 2. Conduct pilot testing of the PtDA-MAT in an iterative process guided by an expert panel and involving key stakeholders (e.g., patients, physicians, policymakers) and field-testing.
Significant public health concerns have arisen from the intravenous misuse of oxymorphone, a potent mu-opioid pain medication. However, little is known about its abuse potential relative to other mu-opioid analgesics. The present study is designed to examine the abuse liability of intravenous oxymorphone compared to other mu opioid agonists (oxycodone, and hydromorphone) among physically dependent opioid abusers.
Intranasal (IN) naloxone administration is an effective alternative to intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) naloxone by emergency medical services for opioid overdoses and has been used successfully for this purpose as reported in clinical observational studies and a randomized controlled trial. Most of the published clinical studies concerning IN administration used an improvised kit of 2 mg naloxone/2 mL saline and a mucosal atomizer device (MAD), which is not FDA-approved for this indication. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data using these kits is not available in the published literature. This study is designed to determine the PK of naloxone following one and two IN administrations using the improvised kits compared to 2 and 4 mg delivered IN using the FDA-approved Narcan nasal spray device and 2 mg administered IM using the Evzio autoinjector.
In collaboration with the First Pavlov State Medical University in St. Petersburg, Russia, we are proposing a pilot, open label, non-randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of treatment for alcohol and opioid use disorders combining Nalmefene and recovery coaching (educational and behaviorally oriented drug counseling). The proposed pilot study will also be used to further develop and refine the recovery coaching/counseling intervention and to train additional cadre of clinicians and researchers in St. Petersburg, Russia.
The Primary Objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of HIV clinic-based extended-release Naltrexone (XR-NTX) in decreasing substance use and increasing HIV viral suppression in HIV-infected participants with opioid use disorder to Treatment as Usual in this population.
This study will evaluate whether a commercially available, secure, electronic pill box is a feasible, acceptable, and satisfactory method to manage take-home dosing of methadone for both methadone clinic patients and staff members.
This pilot study examines the feasibility and acceptability of transitioning office-based buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder from physicians to pharmacists. Results from this study will inform the development of a future multi-site randomized clinical trial.