Protocol for a Feasibility of a Motivational Interviewing for Weight Loss in Adults

Obesity Clinical Trial

— MWL  

Official title:

Motivational to Weight Loss Version 1 (MWL v.1): Protocol for a Feasibility Single-arm, Open-label Clinical Trial of a Motivational Interviewing, Stages and Processes of Change-based Intervention for Weight Loss in Adults

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05769907
• Other study ID #: 20220209
• Secondary ID: 5957362230000532
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 1, 2023
• Est. completion date: March 30, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: March 2023
• Source: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
• Contact: Adriane R Rosa, Corresponding author
• Phone: +55 (51) 3359.6328
• Email: adrianerrosa[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Abstract Introduction: This pilot study will determine the recruitment feasibility, retention, and adhesion for a motivational interviewing program for weight loss in adults according to the processes of change in weight loss.

Methods and Analysis: The single-arm pilot study will be a feasibility study of the Motivation to Lose Weight version 1 (MLW v.1). The study includes presential and online sessions. Participants will be recruited through advertisements on social media and selected according to the inclusion criteria. Participants will receive 8 sessions of approximately 30-45 minutes of motivational interviewing (MI) according to the processes of change in weight loss, as measured by the S-Weight scale. The results will be evaluated at the beginning and the end of the program, which will last 8 weeks. The primary outcome of the study is feasibility. The intervention will be feasible if adherence to the proposed activities in the sessions is greater than 70%, we can recruit 10 patients within 8 weeks, the proportion of interested people and registered participants is greater than 30%, and more than 75% of participants attend the final study visit. The secondary outcome is weight loss, fat mass percentage, muscle mass, waist and hip measurements, and the scores of behavioral scales.

Ethics and discussion: The feasibility of this project consists of proposing an individualized intervention based on MI strategy(s) for each participant, according to the stage of readiness, and thus, help to evolve in the process of losing weight. This intervention aims to increase the participant's confidence level to implement actions that lead to the progression of behavior and, consequently, the action and maintenance of the lost weight. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) under number 20220209 CAAE 59573622300005327.

Description:

The study will consist of one session per week for 8 weeks, during which the participant will receive MI for 30-45 minutes. All participants will receive the MI intervention according to their readiness to lose weight measured by means the P-weight and S-weight at the beginning of each session.

In session one, sociodemographic and clinical information will be collected through a structured interview as well clinical assessment including the following scales: the stage of change to lose weight (S-Weight), symptoms of depression (PROMIS depression v. 8.1a, ), anxiety (PROMIS anxiety v.8.1a, ), psychosocial functioning (FAST ), binge eating (TCAP ), current food intake (24-hours food recall, ), and cognitive process used while losing weight (P-Weight ). In addition, the first session will collect information regarding the participant's body weight, body fat, free fat mass, and waist and hip circumference.

As participants will be in the precontemplation or contemplation stage of change at the beginning of the study, the goals of the first session will be: a) develop participant rapport; b) develop the discrepancy, that is, understand the distance between what the participant wants to change and the actions are taken; c) roll with resistance, that is, do not conflict during the dialogue; d) avoid the correction reflex, that is, avoid correcting something the interviewee says, even if it is technically incorrect or not plausible; e) valuing and validating the person, that is, emphasizing points in the participant's speech to increase their self-confidence; f) establish an agenda of issues to be deal with that are related to being overweight or obese. All these objectives remain in subsequent sessions. To accomplish those goals, the interviewer will use the MI process called "explore," which leads to the topic the participant wants to discuss. The interviewer will use strategies such as open questions, affirmations, reflections, abstracts, exploring discrepancies, informing with permission, explore values and objectives based on the participants' speech in order to elicit from the person their different motives for the desired change . Each session will be registered following the Session Registration Form .

From sessions two to seven, the sessions will take place online through the platform Teams, and the participant will answer the S-weight scale to identify the actual stage of change to lose weight at the beginning of each session. In case of the participant is in the precontemplation, contemplation or preparation phases, the goals in the session will be a) encourage the participant to talk about the reasons that favor him to change and not to change; b) focus on the positive motives to change; c) Increase the participants' confidence, that is, explain that the style of this approach takes into account their autonomy, and thus, any and all decision-making will be shared and not directed from the interviewer to he/she, also because a basic premise of MI is that people are experts on themselves; d) extract from the participant how he/she could make the change, anticipating what it would be like if he/she had already made the change; e) show options for the participant to choose from, based on their own answers; f) stimulate through questions and reflections that the participant himself talks about his/her abilities, this increases the confidence that he is capable of doing things; g) prepare the participant for the action phase; h) predict difficulties; and i) prevent relapse. However, if the participant is in the action, maintenance, or relapse phase, the goals will be to a) stimulate the participant to develop solutions to promote autonomy and confidence in the decision-making process; b) reinforce the commitment to change; c) recall the participants' values through reflections; d) validate the actions already taken, even if they are damage reductions; e) support self-confidence; f) increase support network; g) prevent relapse; and h) consolidate the gains from the changes made.

The goals established in sessions two to seven will be pursued by the interviewer by using the MI process "focus," "evoke," and "plan". Focus will direct the conversation toward the possibility of change, creating a discrepancy between the participants' current actions and their broader life goals and values . Evoking will stimulate the participant to talk about their motivations for change. Planning includes helping the participant to identify a goal, building an action plan, and anticipating difficulties. The interviewer will use strategies such as closed questions, open questions, reflection, importance rule, and trust ruler.

In the last session, the participant will attend an in-person session for the measurement of body weight, body fat, free fat mass, waist, and hip circumference, as well as the assessment of the same clinical scales used in the first session). In addition, the participant will fill in a questionnaire regarding the interviewer's attitude during the sessions, which will indicate the compliance of the researcher with the MI approach.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 54
• Est. completion date: March 30, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: December 30, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Aged 18-60; BMI from 25-34.90 (Kg/m²); Residents of Porto Alegre and nearby regions; No weight loss treatment in the last 6 months; Pre-contemplation or contemplation phase for changing body weight when responding to the S-Weight scale; Stable body weight in the last 3 months (<2% loss); Access to Teams platform; Have access to a body weight scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

Major surgery in the last 3 months; Diagnosed eating disorder; Use of mood stabilizer drugs or antipsychotics, antiobesity or adjuvants in weight control, as well as corticoids (prednisone and similar) in doses greater than 10 mg per day; Dietary treatment for weight loss in the last 6 months; Myocardial infarction or angioplasty in the last 3 months, with chronic kidney disease or undergoing dialysis; with chronic liver failure (Ascites), with congestive heart failure, undergoing treatment for cancer or with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV); Pregnant and lactating women.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Obesity
• Weight Loss

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Intervention Group
The study will consist of one session per week for 8 weeks, during which the participant will receive MI for 30-45 minutes. All participants will receive the MI intervention according to their readiness to lose weight measured by means the P-weight and S-weight at the beginning of each session.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

References & Publications (44)

Andres A, Saldana C, Beeken RJ. Assessment of processes of change for weight management in a UK sample. Obes Facts. 2015;8(1):43-53. doi: 10.1159/000373900. Epub 2015 Jan 29. — View Citation

Andres A, Saldana C, Gomez-Benito J. Establishing the stages and processes of change for weight loss by consensus of experts. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Sep;17(9):1717-23. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.100. Epub 2009 Apr 9. — View Citation

Andres A, Saldana C, Gomez-Benito J. The transtheoretical model in weight management: validation of the processes of change questionnaire. Obes Facts. 2011;4(6):433-42. doi: 10.1159/000335135. Epub 2011 Nov 25. — View Citation

Armstrong MJ, Mottershead TA, Ronksley PE, Sigal RJ, Campbell TS, Hemmelgarn BR. Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2011 Se — View Citation

Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141709. — View Citation

Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their patients. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Jan-Feb;39(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.010. — View Citation

Burgess E, Hassmen P, Welvaert M, Pumpa KL. Behavioural treatment strategies improve adherence to lifestyle intervention programmes in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2017 Apr;7(2):105-114. doi: 10.1111/cob.12180. Epub 2017 Feb 15. — View Citation

Carels RA, Darby L, Cacciapaglia HM, Konrad K, Coit C, Harper J, Kaplar ME, Young K, Baylen CA, Versland A. Using motivational interviewing as a supplement to obesity treatment: a stepped-care approach. Health Psychol. 2007 May;26(3):369-74. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.3.369. — View Citation

Ceccarini M, Borrello M, Pietrabissa G, Manzoni GM, Castelnuovo G. Assessing motivation and readiness to change for weight management and control: an in-depth evaluation of three sets of instruments. Front Psychol. 2015 May 11;6:511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.20 — View Citation

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. — View Citation

Chopra S, Malhotra A, Ranjan P, Vikram NK, Sarkar S, Siddhu A, Kumari A, Kaloiya GS, Kumar A. Predictors of successful weight loss outcomes amongst individuals with obesity undergoing lifestyle interventions: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2021 Mar;22(3): — View Citation

Clark PG, Greene GW, Blissmer BJ, Lees FD, Riebe DA, Stamm KE. Trajectories of Maintenance and Resilience in Healthful Eating and Exercise Behaviors in Older Adults. J Aging Health. 2019 Jun;31(5):861-882. doi: 10.1177/0898264317746264. Epub 2017 Dec 12. — View Citation

Culliford A, Bradbury J. A cross-sectional survey of the readiness of consumers to adopt an environmentally sustainable diet. Nutr J. 2020 Dec 9;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00644-7. — View Citation

de Castro NFC, de Melo Costa Pinto R, da Silva Mendonca TM, da Silva CHM. Psychometric validation of PROMIS(R) Anxiety and Depression Item Banks for the Brazilian population. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02319-1. Epub 2019 Oct 9. — View Citation

de Freitas PP, de Menezes MC, Dos Santos LC, Pimenta AM, Ferreira AVM, Lopes ACS. The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020 May 11;20(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08796-1. — View Citation

Di Noia J, Prochaska JO. Dietary stages of change and decisional balance: a meta-analytic review. Am J Health Behav. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):618-32. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.34.5.11. — View Citation

Duran Aguero S, Araneda J, Ahumada D, Silva Rojas J, Bonacich RB, Caichac A, Salamanca MF, Villarroel P, Fernandez E, Pacheco V, Martinovic PA, Wilson W, Neira AM, Encina C, Tilleria JM. A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Stages of Change in Food Consumption with Warning Labels among Chilean University Students. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 16;2020:2317929. doi: 10.1155/2020/2317929. eCollection 2020. — View Citation

Durrer Schutz D, Busetto L, Dicker D, Farpour-Lambert N, Pryke R, Toplak H, Widmer D, Yumuk V, Schutz Y. European Practical and Patient-Centred Guidelines for Adult Obesity Management in Primary Care. Obes Facts. 2019;12(1):40-66. doi: 10.1159/000496183. — View Citation

Erol S, Erdogan S. Application of a stage based motivational interviewing approach to adolescent smoking cessation: the Transtheoretical Model-based study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jul;72(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 4. — View Citation

Forsberg L, Kallmen H, Hermansson U, Berman AH, Helgason AR. Coding counsellor behaviour in motivational interviewing sessions: inter-rater reliability for the Swedish Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (MITI). Cogn Behav Ther. 2007;36(3):162-9. doi: 10.1080/16506070701339887. — View Citation

Hardcastle SJ, Taylor AH, Bailey MP, Harley RA, Hagger MS. Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomised controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Mar 28;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-40. — View Citation

Hayotte M, Negre V, Gray L, Sadoul JL, d'Arripe-Longueville F. The transtheoretical model (TTM) to gain insight into young women's long-term physical activity after bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2020 Feb;30(2):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04220-9. — View Citation

Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.20247. — View Citation

Ismail K, Stahl D, Bayley A, Twist K, Stewart K, Ridge K, Britneff E, Ashworth M, de Zoysa N, Rundle J, Cook D, Whincup P, Treasure J, McCrone P, Greenough A, Winkley K. Enhanced motivational interviewing for reducing weight and increasing physical activity in adults with high cardiovascular risk: the MOVE IT three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(69):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta23690. — View Citation

Karintrakul S, Angkatavanich J. A randomized controlled trial of an individualized nutrition counseling program matched with a transtheoretical model for overweight and obese females in Thailand. Nutr Res Pract. 2017 Aug;11(4):319-326. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2017.11.4.319. Epub 2017 Jun 22. — View Citation

Knight KM, McGowan L, Dickens C, Bundy C. A systematic review of motivational interviewing in physical health care settings. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 May;11(Pt 2):319-32. doi: 10.1348/135910705X52516. — View Citation

Lecube A, Sanchez E, Andres A, Saldana C, Morales MJ, Calanas A, Minambres I, Pellitero S, Cordido F, Bueno M, Caixas A, Vilarrasa N; Obesity Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (GOSEEN). Assessing Motivational Stages and Processes — View Citation

Makin H, Chisholm A, Fallon V, Goodwin L. Use of motivational interviewing in behavioural interventions among adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2021 Aug;11(4):e12457. doi: 10.1111/cob.12457. Epub 2021 May 6. — View Citation

Mastellos N, Gunn LH, Felix LM, Car J, Majeed A. Transtheoretical model stages of change for dietary and physical exercise modification in weight loss management for overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 5;(2):CD008066. doi: 10 — View Citation

Maula A, Kendrick D, Kai J, Griffiths F. Evidence generated from a realist synthesis of trials on educational weight loss interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2021 Jan;38(1):e14394. doi: 10.1111/dme.14394. Epub 2020 Oct 8. — View Citation

Miller WR, Rollnick S. Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Mar;37(2):129-40. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809005128. — View Citation

Moss EL, Tobin LN, Campbell TS, von Ranson KM. Behavioral weight-loss treatment plus motivational interviewing versus attention control: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jul 25;18(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2094-1. — View Citation

Nymberg P, Ekvall Hansson E, Stenman E, Calling S, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Zoller B. Pilot study on increased adherence to physical activity on prescription (PAP) through mindfulness: study protocol. Trials. 2018 Oct 17;19(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2932-9. — View Citation

Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.9.1102. — View Citation

Resnicow K, McMaster F. Motivational Interviewing: moving from why to how with autonomy support. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Mar 2;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-19. — View Citation

Rosa AR, Andreazza AC, Sanchez-Moreno J, Gazalle FK, Santin A, Stein A, Barros HM, Vieta E, Kapczinski F. Validation of the Portuguese version of the Lithium Attitudes Questionnaire (LAQ) in bipolar patients treated with lithium: cross-over study. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2006 Nov 22;2:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-0179-2-32. — View Citation

Rosa AR, Sanchez-Moreno J, Martinez-Aran A, Salamero M, Torrent C, Reinares M, Comes M, Colom F, Van Riel W, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Kapczinski F, Vieta E. Validity and reliability of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2007 Jun 7;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1745-0179-3-5. — View Citation

Suire KB, Kavookjian J, Feiss R, Wadsworth DD. Motivational Interviewing for Weight Management Among Women: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of RCTs. Int J Behav Med. 2021 Aug;28(4):403-416. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09934-0. Epub 2020 Oct 20. — View Citation

Tanikawa Y, Kimachi M, Ishikawa M, Hisada T, Fukuhara S, Yamamoto Y. Association between work schedules and motivation for lifestyle change in workers with overweight or obesity: a cross-sectional study in Japan. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 30;10(4):e033000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033000. — View Citation

Teare MD, Dimairo M, Shephard N, Hayman A, Whitehead A, Walters SJ. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study. Trials. 2014 Jul 3;15:264. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-264. — View Citation

Toral N, Slater B. [Transtheoretical model approach in eating behavior]. Cien Saude Colet. 2007 Nov-Dec;12(6):1641-50. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232007000600025. Portuguese. — View Citation

Wilson GT, Schlam TR. The transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing in the treatment of eating and weight disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;24(3):361-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.03.003. — View Citation

Woo S, Park KH. Motivating Children and Adolescents in Obesity Treatment. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2020 Dec 30;29(4):260-269. doi: 10.7570/jomes20026. — View Citation

Ziebart C, MacDermid J, Bryant D, Szekeres M, Suh N. Hands-Up program: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a combined 6-week exercise and education intervention in adults aged 50-65 with a distal radius fracture. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e046122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046122. — View Citation

* Note: There are 44 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The primary outcome is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the pilot study	Adherence rate, Recruitment rate, Retention rates	8 weeks
Secondary	percentage of weight loss body	5% of baseline	8 weeks
Secondary	number of participants who progressed through stages of change in weight loss	70% of participants progress through the change stage	8 weeks

External Links

•   PSS Health: Power and Sample Size for Health Researchers [Internet]. [cited 11 de fevereiro de 2021]